For some reason I think Smartmatic is under WH control. That would mean that Fox and Newsmax would be a way of getting money to them without making it look like it was right wing money flowing into it. It would be how I did it.
I certainly entertain all thoughts on this, and it would be great if WH controls.
Another thought I had is that if you follow the money far enough the same people that control Fox News also control Dominion.
The same people who control Newsmax also control Smartmatic.
At the end of all of this, one sues the other, and the other pays to settle, but the money all stays in the same pool.
Maybe when someone receives a settlement it is considered "tax-free" and it's just another way to launder money from one entity to another.
In this scenario, election fraud can occur, and some media will say no proof can be found. For those who say fraud did occur, they will be sued. They will settle which makes them look guilty. But in the end, they are just paying themselves settlement fees. They are just stirring the giant slush funds around in their bucket.
And then this allows all the Sheeple to say, "See, no fraud!"
That's precisely it. Smartmatic gets to leave the impression their machines were ok without having to prove it and Newsmax gets to collect on ad revenue for increased viewership acting like the victim. Probably had a campaign asking for donations.
For some reason I think Smartmatic is under WH control. That would mean that Fox and Newsmax would be a way of getting money to them without making it look like it was right wing money flowing into it. It would be how I did it.
I certainly entertain all thoughts on this, and it would be great if WH controls.
Another thought I had is that if you follow the money far enough the same people that control Fox News also control Dominion.
The same people who control Newsmax also control Smartmatic.
At the end of all of this, one sues the other, and the other pays to settle, but the money all stays in the same pool.
Maybe when someone receives a settlement it is considered "tax-free" and it's just another way to launder money from one entity to another.
In this scenario, election fraud can occur, and some media will say no proof can be found. For those who say fraud did occur, they will be sued. They will settle which makes them look guilty. But in the end, they are just paying themselves settlement fees. They are just stirring the giant slush funds around in their bucket.
And then this allows all the Sheeple to say, "See, no fraud!"
Purely speculative brainstorming.
That's precisely it. Smartmatic gets to leave the impression their machines were ok without having to prove it and Newsmax gets to collect on ad revenue for increased viewership acting like the victim. Probably had a campaign asking for donations.