I don't know where these are from but they resonate strongly with me. Worth noting. Research wanted.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
SOFR has been mentioned here before.
If our ports were under UN control, would that have been done by treaty or contract?
What jurisdiction were they under originally, federal or state, or possibly even local/private?
This probably wouldn’t just apply to our naval ports, but also our air ports, and possibly even our international network ports as well?
Worth looking into.
We are members of the IMO via treaty in Geneva in 1948 (nobody ever talks about Truman, and I don’t know much about him, but I don’t trust him to have been good)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Maritime_Organization
“Embassy Art Program”
Remember how the “dancing Israelis” at 9/11 were art students? Relevant?
FAPE is tied to Bloomberg…. didn’t he run for president or something?
https://fapeculturaldiplomacy.org/ (See “Bloomberg Connect”)
Began in 1953, also under True Man
https://art.state.gov/faq/
JFK pulled them under the state department.
They are planning a “250 for 250” event, currently. 👀👀
Their website doesn’t have a security certificate…. “Gosh I wonder why.”
SOFR replacements
https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/markets/libor/the-global-move-away-from-LIBOR
Well, that’s not good.
https://thetradinganalyst.com/what-is-sofr/
We haven’t looked into this enough. The replacement is well underway, and LIBOR and SWIFT have ruled the world for decades. If SOFR is the new system, we should know about it. Haven’t seen a update notice from any ports yet, or read these two links myself yet, but they look like good starts.
u/Darq2Light u/photobuf
Dancing Israelis were a "moving company" dancing on their van in a parking lot in NJ. Art students were a different group conducting their art project in one of the towers prior to 9.11.
Ah, I had them associated. Details off, point still relevant, but thanks!
Indeed we need to look into it more deeply.
I would guess 1933 is a time where things were changed with the entry of UCC, positioned as a "harmonization" of admiralty law, which was on certain places, applicable.
The assholes of CBDC are now trying to persuade state legislators to accept CBDC under UCC .....
It seems to me, that would be a perfect angle to sneak in a contract, which is governed by UN special agencies ....
The same way, you would not notice that the post-office is a member of the Universal Postal Union, thereby incurring duties based on postal codes and DEI.
The same way for water authorities.
A short while ago, I noticed some water authorities, which were the oldest democratic institutions in The Netherlands, were actually contract bound in a national and EU-union, supplanting the influence of the local people. ....
This is the blueprint for all these sneaky losses of sovereignty. This is how the game is played.
Do you think SOFR is their replacement or ours? I don’t know enough about it yet, but BASEL III looks like it’s going to be theirs.
Thanks for the launch pad fren.