First off, the Roman Salute is a White European greeting that White Europeans gave each other for centuries -- likely starting during the Roman Empire, 2,000 years ago.
If anyone thinks it is "Nazi" or "bad," it is only due to propaganda, not reality.
The Germans adopted the salute as a tribute to their White European heritage.
Here are American students with a Roman Salute to the US flag.
Second, here is a video clip from the 1939 rally in New York City, at Madison Square Garden -- complete with audio and subtitles for the first few minutes.
Note the reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance in its ORIGINAL form (it has since been changed):
"I pledge UNDIVIDED allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and the republic for which it stands, ONE NATION INDIVISIBLE, with liberty and justice for all.
Anchor babies and dual citizens will NEVER have undivided allegiance -- and we see the results of that play out today. We have invaders and infiltrators trying to destroy from within, which is WHY there must be UNDIVIDED loyalty. But they took that out of the Pledge for some odd reason ... hmm ...
The speaker begins by stating WHY they were having the rally.
This is something the fake news media will NEVER reveal to the People -- for obvious reasons.
Sure, they will show you imagery, but they will spin the story to suit their false narrative. They will not let you hear the words that were actually spoken.
Hear and see for yourself:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TL8X51siDNne
Third, this rally was held February 20, 1939.
At this time, the jews in Poland were committing atrocities against the ethnic German people who were living there -- the borders were changed from Germany to Poland as a result of Germany's loss in WW1.
The jewish Bolsheviks in Russia were moving westward into Poland (with plans to take over Europe). They were raping, torturing, and murdering German civilians living there.
Hitler was asking world leaders for help in stopping these attrocities. All world leaders ignored him because they wanted a pretext for war.
On September 1, 1939 (just over 6 months after this rally), Germany finally went into Poland to put an end to the attrocities. They did end it, but England and France used the "invasion" as a pretext to declare war on Germany. They knew the real reason Hitler went in, but of course they lied about it.
Fourth, The beginning of the speech references the infiltration within the USA, as well, and one of the infiltrators storms the stage.
The fake news media will not show you any of that.
Even the producer of this video clip will not tell you WHY the things that happened during that time happened. He -- like the fake news media -- wants everyone to believe Hitler was crazy and evil.
In realty, Hitler was responding to evil.
Finally, if you want to understand the evil that Hitler and the German people were defending against, watch this -- a documentary told in Hitler's own words:
And the lies are being perpetuated
To the point now, that if one questions ANY part of the narrative one needs to be jailed and have ones career demolished.
“We have invaders and infiltrators trying to destroy from within, which is WHY there must be UNDIVIDED loyalty. But they took that out of the Pledge for some odd reason ... hmm ...”
Probably because so many in congress have dual citizenship, many with Israel. No one should be allowed to serve in government that has dual citizenship. Period.
Awesome post. Thanks.
The Nazis had zero interest in "white European heritage." They disrespected any white ethnicity other than Aryan.
The undivided/indivisible thing in the Pledge of Allegiance is not about anchor babies; it's about preventing States from leaving the Union. Think of the terms Civil War vs. War Between the States (a "civil" war is a war within one country).
Your analysis of Hitler is simplistic.
Hitler arose as a product of WWI and the terms imposed by the Allies (primarily pushed by Wilson) in the The Treaty of Versailles, particularly clause 231, the ‘War Guilt Clause’. Just as slavery was not really a motivation for the US Civil War (War Between the States) but has been imposed in restrospect, the idea that WWII was about "the Jews" is also imposed in retrospect. No one really paid all that much attention to them at the time.
Hyperinflation, unemployment, the punitive terms of the Treaty of Versailles, political instability and coalition governments due to the proportional representation voting system, all fed conditions of social unrest. The icing on the cake was the crash of 1929. All of these let to conditions where "a solution to the problem" needed to be found. Into that vacuum, came Anton Drexler and the German Workers’ Party, later changed to National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP), more commonly referred to as the Nazi Party. They were proud to be German, hostile to Versailles. Adolf Hitler joined, and later took it over.
The Nazis came to power with the help of the old-school conservatives who thought they could co-opt the party, control Hitler, and eliminate the other leftists. As the economic consequences of the depression hit harder, the share of Nazi votes in the proportional representation system rose sharply. In 1932, they netted 37.3% of the votes, the largest share of any party. Hitler was sworn in as the chancellor of Germany on the 30 January 1933. The conservative elite soon realised that they had miscalculated--the Nazis had their own agenda. The Reichstag Fire of 1933, and the feeling that they were "under attack", gave the Nazis great popular support and a legal basis for the Enabling Law, emergency powers that allowed them to directly enact legislation without it having to go through the Reichstag. It allowed persecution and oppression of any opponents, who were be framed as traitors to the Republic.
The Nazi philosophy was anti-non-Germans. Hitler believed that "scientific breeding" that one sees in racehorses or dog breeds should be applied to humans as well. The Aryan race was superior to all other white people as well as to everyone else. He instituted the T-4 Program of sterilization and killing of the "unfit" (physically disabled, elderly, sick, mentally retarded, effeminate gays (he was OK with the masculine type), Gypsies--and Jews). Jews were not the main focus, they were simply caught up in the whole "racial hygiene" thing. Economically, the Nazis were typical left-progressives of the time as befits a party with "Socialist" and "Workers" in the title during the worldwide economic depression of the 1930s.
Religiously, they wanted to co-opt Christianity and turn it back to pre-Christian Aryan mythology. This generated a lot of opposition from the Catholic Church (especially Clements August Count von Galen) as well as from serious Protestants like Dietrich Bonhoffer, who were already objecting to the sterilization of the handicapped going on as part of the "superior race breeding" program.
There was a whole lot more going on than your simplisitic "it was the Jews" analysis.
Show me which White people they disrespected.
You could maybe argue that about "indivisible," but not about "undivided."
They took out "undivided" for a reason -- they WANTED to allow divided allegiance (which is an oxymoron).
Says you, who believes the mainstream garbage -- the most simplistic view of all ("Hitler ... evil ... let's end the discussion, and not analyze anything").
True, except that Wilson was a puppet of jews.
LOL, Hitler talked about the jews in his speeches ALL THE TIME.
From the anti-Germany side, it was about England wanting to keep Germany from getting stronger, as they had become the #1 economy in the world under Hitler. But it was also about the jews wanting to destroy the Germans, and especially Hitler, in part as a response to Hitler kicking them out of Germany, and in part due to their desire to spread their communism to Europe, and then the rest of the world.
Yes, all of that is well-docmented as historical fact. What is also well-known -- and even more well-known by the German people at the time -- were Hitler's views, as he wrote a book about his views, for all the German folk to read.
Everybody knew who he was and what his mission was -- AND THEY SUPPORTED IT.
THIS is what you and most people refuse to see. It is hidden from the "official" history books because once you realize that the German people knew Hitler's agenda, there was NOTHING secretive about it, you would then have to ask: WHY did they support him?
And THAT is what the jewish media does not want people to know.
WHY were the jews a problem?
Even modern day rabbis don't know, and when they find out, here is what they say:
"Why did Hitler hate the jews?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLqXs9hXsA4
And another rabbi:
"Hitler's first two laws"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lP2P4aeIuzEx/
Modern "historians" (so-called) absolutely MUST lie about this part of history in order to push their narratives.
False. They were pro-nationalism. By that, they meant their OWN PEOPLE, as a NATION.
The word "nation" today has become bastardized, like so many other words. Gay used to mean happy.
Nation comes from the latin "nacio," which means "of birth." It is a community of poeple who are OF THE SAME BIRTH, or OF THE SAME GENETIC FAMILY TREE.
The "socialism" they promoted was NOT leftist Marxism, which you erroneously stated in another thread.
Rather, it was similar to the American Founding Fathers in the preamble to the Consitution, which reads:
" ... [to] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
By this, they did not mean to create a "welfare state," but to promote the general well-being. Similarly, the German national "socialism" was to help their fellow brothers and sisters -- the Germanic people and their general well-being -- which was nothing at all to do with communist ideology (which is what they were fighting against by fighting the jews, who created and promoted communism).
Also, German "national" socialism was similar to the American's "... ourselves and our Posterity." IOW -- "OUR PEOPLE."
That is complete bullshit and an attempt to change history -- just like all the fake history books out there -- which you gobbled up and never questioned.
Since you CLEARLY do not understand what THEY meant by "national" or "socialist," and instead use your own terms (such as "gay" meaning homosexual, when the original meaning was happy) ... I would say YOU are the one with a simplistic view.
And since YOU have no clue what happened in history, you ARE (right now) being condemned to repeat it, as Santayana said, as we are witnessing (right now) the destruction of America by the same people using the same means that the German people were under attack from in the 1920's and 1930's.
Put down the mainstream propaganda, do some additional research, and ... Get a clue.