So the feminism movement went off the rails pretty damn fast, but it did start from a good position, I think. When a woman is mostly dependent on the men in her life, that puts her in a very vulnerable position if there doesn't happen to be any good men for her to rely on. I had an aunt who was married to an alcoholic, and some of the stories she told me were pretty damn bad. He wasn't even a man who would become violent when he drank, but he used all their money on alcohol, to the point they had problems getting enough food, and they had 3 sons. The worst years for her were late 1940s, after the war, and 1950s.
And as far as I understand that was one of the early reasons why some women started to advocate for women to get an education and jobs of their own.
Now I think it would be good if we could get more mothers back home, but what if the husband turns out bad?
How would you solve this?
How do women find those men, when the pool of men was DELIBERATELY DESTROYED AND DOWNBRED thanks to four generations of war draft and war, deliberately selecting for destruction/maiming the very flower of those generations from WW1 on?
church is a good place to start
The churches have backed the (((concerted destruction of white male chads))) back to the 19-teens. And they continue to make heroes of men who destroy themselves and their families to go to war for Greatest Ally.
Gonna need another suggestion.
you act like there's only one church. there are lots of bad ones, but there are lots of good ones, too. and if you're really searching, you'll find the right one for you.
From experience... not necessarily.
doesn't mean all men at church are good. but genuinely seeking God is always a good place to start, and that usually involves a church.
The "genuine" quality is the hard part. Unfortunately, some men go to church because they've been told that's where decent women are. Not because they're seeking God. It's good to be discerning wherever you find an interested man.