Can you show me one case where the RED line spikes???
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
In a chart like this, a perfect vertical line is mathematically impossible.
Exactly. That's how I knew 2020 was stolen immediately. When I saw those vertical lines on a progression graph, yea, that is 100% fuckery.
In mathematics ---- it will be known as the fraud vote "F" pattern.
All of the lines on a chart like this are perfectly vertical. Tabulation centers aren't reporting ballots one-by-one. In the chart in this image there's a very clear vertical line for republican votes too, not sure what you mean.
The graph shows ballot count over time. Time is continuously moving forward. To produce a perfect vertical line, a ballot dump would require several boxes that were 100% for one candidate in one moment of time which is mathematically impossible. Also, I have seen no red vertical lines on anyone’s graph.
This is showing republican and democratic votes separately. A vertical jump on either line just shows a certain number of votes reported for that party. What you're describing is if one of the parties went vertical while the other stayed horizontal for that timestamp.
There's a corresponding vertical line for republican at the same time in this graph: https://i.imgur.com/M9K4Ftk.png
This is the correct observation. At that time there was an increase in votes for BOTH candidates. There were more Harris votes than there were Trump votes in that dump. Thereafter the discrepancy was less pronounced in the graph. So despite its fishiness I could conceivable see the line as a dump of millions of inner city votes that will favor Harris 3 to 1 or 4 to 1. But Trump had already built a lead too big to overcome.
Yup, I'm not dismissing the possibility of fraud here, but a large increase like this is not inherently fraudulent.
Where? I see a line with a high slope which is possible, but no vertical lines like the one I see in blue.
Yeah, if you want to nitpick graph rendering minutia then we can see the blue line isn't perfectly vertical either: https://i.imgur.com/0Q4PbHO.png
Yes, we can. You still haven’t pointed out where on the graph a red line is vertical. Give me an x-axis reference.
Why do you think there's some time component for the vote additions? It's just a discrete datapoint with a timestamp: at this point in time, the vote total changed to x. Any slope you see in the line is a result of how it was rendered, and it will be present in spikes of both republican and democratic votes.
Oh, I think I shall faint with excitement! 🤭
Whoa. That vertical blue line looks awfully familiar. That looks it *was too big to rig.
I have seen it before, some four years back, I did!
They always use the excuse that it happens when they start counting high pop blue cities, it's a believable excuse to cover their shenanigans. I'd love to see graphs like that from past elections, but don't know if they exist.
No precinct can be that blue...
Unfortunately the Senate race in WI was not too big to rig. The blue line stole it.
The BLUE line that spikes upwards is called the WTF LINE, the RED line line that spikes upwards is call when Hell freezes over
Like gyroscopic precession on helicopter aerodynamics, its impossible.
failed steal