Devil's Advocate here, while I share the concern he has, he is extrapolating a bit here. from the bit of context of the paper he gives, it sounds like this is more of an inhalable vaccination administered nasally rather than some sort of vaccine bomb dropped on a city.
There's no doubt in my mind that governments would do such a thing if they thought they could get away with it, but we're a little ways off from that scenario with this paper is my point.
The amount of antigens and other vaccine components needed to accomplish what people are claiming is practically impossible to make in quantities that would be needed.
What this article is talking about is a nasal spray vaccine. Which has to be give directly into the nostril for it to work. It's simply impossible to get enough antigens in the open air in order to inoculate people that way.
I think people are getting a bit carried away with this one. There are plenty of real issues going on that are legitimate cause for concern. We don't need to go out of our way to find things to get upset about.
What concerns me about this is that we're going to see more and more of these nasal spray vaccines for childhood immunizations.That eliminates the number one reason why most normies are against vaccines. They simply don't trust shots and will think the nasal vaccines are safe(r).
They don't need to go through all these elaborate scenarios where they're secretly trying to vaccinate everyone by spraying vaccines in the air when all they need to do is make the general public believe vaccines are safe. And they're doing that by taking away the top reason people are against them.
I think the main point U/BakasEverywhere is trying to make about feasibility still stands, though. The amount of mRNA you'd have to produce to be effective would be astronomical. my understanding is even simply spraying a chemical agent isn't as deadly as it's often made out to be (sounds terrifying of course), because whatever agent is used often has trouble achieving a lethal level in the air quick enough and long enough to kill more than a handful of people.
If they can achieve the same result by simply making vaccines/mRNA injections less scary, why bother?
Devil's Advocate here, while I share the concern he has, he is extrapolating a bit here. from the bit of context of the paper he gives, it sounds like this is more of an inhalable vaccination administered nasally rather than some sort of vaccine bomb dropped on a city.
There's no doubt in my mind that governments would do such a thing if they thought they could get away with it, but we're a little ways off from that scenario with this paper is my point.
The amount of antigens and other vaccine components needed to accomplish what people are claiming is practically impossible to make in quantities that would be needed.
What this article is talking about is a nasal spray vaccine. Which has to be give directly into the nostril for it to work. It's simply impossible to get enough antigens in the open air in order to inoculate people that way.
I think people are getting a bit carried away with this one. There are plenty of real issues going on that are legitimate cause for concern. We don't need to go out of our way to find things to get upset about.
What concerns me about this is that we're going to see more and more of these nasal spray vaccines for childhood immunizations.That eliminates the number one reason why most normies are against vaccines. They simply don't trust shots and will think the nasal vaccines are safe(r).
They don't need to go through all these elaborate scenarios where they're secretly trying to vaccinate everyone by spraying vaccines in the air when all they need to do is make the general public believe vaccines are safe. And they're doing that by taking away the top reason people are against them.
Antigens aren't in their "vaccines" anymore, do you not realize that? They coded mRNA for making spike proteins, which also wasn't an antigen.
I think the main point U/BakasEverywhere is trying to make about feasibility still stands, though. The amount of mRNA you'd have to produce to be effective would be astronomical. my understanding is even simply spraying a chemical agent isn't as deadly as it's often made out to be (sounds terrifying of course), because whatever agent is used often has trouble achieving a lethal level in the air quick enough and long enough to kill more than a handful of people.
If they can achieve the same result by simply making vaccines/mRNA injections less scary, why bother?
Thank you, that was exactly what my main point is. 🙂