But they cannot admit it into court, and that's what protects most people.
Frankly I don't give a fuck if you don't like the answer, the fact is that because it is inadmissible is what has stopped them and that's why legalizing it is a red line.
They are spying on us, but they can't do anything about it because it's illegal to do so.
They can't admit any evidence into court, but they absolutely would be able to if you allowed them to legalize it.
Get over yourself. It's just because you don't like the answer. Because you didn't grasp the distinction between what they can do with this information if it is legalized.
Your inability to grasp that distinction is not my problem.
Where legality stopped them is in court.
If the law ever stopped them there'd be no need for Q.
DING DING DING DING DING
But they cannot admit it into court, and that's what protects most people.
Frankly I don't give a fuck if you don't like the answer, the fact is that because it is inadmissible is what has stopped them and that's why legalizing it is a red line.
It's not that I don't like your answer. It's that your answer is wrong.
No, my answer is objectively correct.
They are spying on us, but they can't do anything about it because it's illegal to do so.
They can't admit any evidence into court, but they absolutely would be able to if you allowed them to legalize it.
Get over yourself. It's just because you don't like the answer. Because you didn't grasp the distinction between what they can do with this information if it is legalized.
Your inability to grasp that distinction is not my problem.