There’s already a statement preventing the government from infringing on the right to bear arms…simple rescind the 20,000+ illegal firearm laws and well call it even.
But decades of Deep State propaganda have brainwashed millions of Americans into believing otherwise. A new law would go a long way toward showing them what 2A really means.
There’s already a statement preventing the government from infringing on the right to bear arms…simple rescind the 20,000+ illegal firearm laws and well call it even.
Yeah. What does this bill have that the Constitution does not?
Sauce: Sponsor: Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4] (Introduced 09/11/2024)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/9534/text
https://www.gun-tests.com/news/nagr-announces-plan-to-reverse-gun-control/
“…shall not be infringed.”
So simple a 5th grader can explain it. No new ‘laws’ required.
No, no new lawa are required, you are right.
But decades of Deep State propaganda have brainwashed millions of Americans into believing otherwise. A new law would go a long way toward showing them what 2A really means.
A new law perpetuates Constitutional ignorance.
It directs the Supreme Court about how to interpret the Constitution.
How about a bill penalizing infringements?
Infringing on the right to bear arms is illegal. Infringing on a constitutional right.
That right there is significantly anti American and egregious.
I mean how about a bill or agency providing some actual enforcement when the infringement occurs? And not just crickets...