I think it would be more accurate that he asked or advised Trump not to release all the files.
And again, can we assume that this is 'shady'?
If we're following Q and have understood the plan, it seems pretty darn obvious that timing is everything. Admin #1 > Fake Biden Admin > Admin #2. Look at how the hammer is dropping everywhere as of Jan 20. Can we be certain that releasing all the JFK files during the first administration would have been optimal?
The files not being released, in conjunction with RFK joining Team Trump, in conjunction with complete and full disclosure now - this certainly has a LOT more impact than (in my view) it would have had in 2020 or 2029, etc.
Narrative warfare.
As I understand it, DJT has stated that Pompeo advised him to not release all the files (many were in fact released). But in and of itself, I don't think that I can consider that 'shady'. Timing.
It's interesting, also, that pretty much you cannot remember off the top of your head, shady stuff Pompeo has done. Compare with Clinton, Schiff, McConnel, Vindman, heck, even Whatshername Cassidy Hutchinson. Easy to recall what any of these folks have done that is not only shady, but even criminal in some cases.
There has been a lot of talk and a lot of doubt and aspersions cast at Pompeo by the influencers both in our camp and also by the Globalist leftists. But concrete, verified factual information seems pretty sparse. For that reason, I take all the noise being fired at Pompeo, and also those firing that noise, to be a powerful indicator.
Q said Trust Kansas numerous times, and very clearly indicated that they were referring to Pompeo (its all int he drops). Was that disinfo? Could be. But personally, I'm wary of folks who assert their beliefs and opinions as if fact.
Maybe Pompeo isn't dirty but also not great. Maybe Trump used him to perfection to achieve his goals. But the aspersions being cast on Pompeo deserve examination both for and against, imo.
People didn’t immediately cast him aside when he would do shady stuff because Q said ‘trust Kansas’.
What shady stuff did he do? I mean, that we know for a fact? Because there are plenty of accusations. But nothing like that from Trump.
Consider what Trump has said about Bolton. Has he ever said anything similar at all about Pompeo? Not that I've seen.
I actually can’t remember off the top of my head. I know he told Trump to not release the JFK files.
I think it would be more accurate that he asked or advised Trump not to release all the files.
And again, can we assume that this is 'shady'?
If we're following Q and have understood the plan, it seems pretty darn obvious that timing is everything. Admin #1 > Fake Biden Admin > Admin #2. Look at how the hammer is dropping everywhere as of Jan 20. Can we be certain that releasing all the JFK files during the first administration would have been optimal?
The files not being released, in conjunction with RFK joining Team Trump, in conjunction with complete and full disclosure now - this certainly has a LOT more impact than (in my view) it would have had in 2020 or 2029, etc.
Narrative warfare.
As I understand it, DJT has stated that Pompeo advised him to not release all the files (many were in fact released). But in and of itself, I don't think that I can consider that 'shady'. Timing.
It's interesting, also, that pretty much you cannot remember off the top of your head, shady stuff Pompeo has done. Compare with Clinton, Schiff, McConnel, Vindman, heck, even Whatshername Cassidy Hutchinson. Easy to recall what any of these folks have done that is not only shady, but even criminal in some cases.
There has been a lot of talk and a lot of doubt and aspersions cast at Pompeo by the influencers both in our camp and also by the Globalist leftists. But concrete, verified factual information seems pretty sparse. For that reason, I take all the noise being fired at Pompeo, and also those firing that noise, to be a powerful indicator.
Q said Trust Kansas numerous times, and very clearly indicated that they were referring to Pompeo (its all int he drops). Was that disinfo? Could be. But personally, I'm wary of folks who assert their beliefs and opinions as if fact.
Maybe Pompeo isn't dirty but also not great. Maybe Trump used him to perfection to achieve his goals. But the aspersions being cast on Pompeo deserve examination both for and against, imo.
Oh. Is that why?