Yeah Yeah, I know, It wasn't exactly day 1 that it was released. But did you really expect that they were going to be released that fast? Kash said all these things without even knowing the situation behind the scenes (I assume).
And, i will say, many here lack critical thinking skills, because why in the world would it make any sense that the Epstein List be revealed with all names on it unredacted BEFORE arrests started? Like her or not, Pam Bondi has to build a case based on evidence presented. Remember, Q said the following in Q post 3724:
"It must be done right. It must be done according to the rule of law. It must carry weight. It must be proven in the court of law. There can be no mistakes. Good things sometimes take time."
So yes, it's gonna probably take a bit before we see the contents of Epstein's list. I am confident it will be released eventually, but arrests have to happen first or else this would be all for nothing. It doesn't make sense to release it and be like "We know who you are!" and give the bad guys a chance to run for it.
One final thing. Consider what is literally on the sidebar from Q post 725:
"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions."
Unfortunate but true. On top of your points, I think they were a bit surprised by these activist judges in lower courts as well. I thought that all of the push back would come from the usual suspects and I also thought the DOJ could get emergency hearings with the supreme court. Being fairly certain that chief justice Roberts is the passenger we saw as "John Roberts" on the flight log that was leaked early on, the DOJ may never be able to get a hearing.