When the President is acting as Commander in Chief, there is no due process.
If he was acting as chief executive, then maybe there is due process.
It's a slippery slope.
Is the SCOTUS next going to say that any terrorists targeted for drone strikes must first be flown to the US for a due process hearing before being sent back for said drone strike on them?
So what does it mean is it in or out of the US?
Sounds like a cluster to me.
It's all really simple.
When the President is acting as Commander in Chief, there is no due process.
If he was acting as chief executive, then maybe there is due process.
It's a slippery slope.
Is the SCOTUS next going to say that any terrorists targeted for drone strikes must first be flown to the US for a due process hearing before being sent back for said drone strike on them?
Yes and he should have been executed not deported…