🎬 Why Godfather III Matters Now
Godfather Part III isn't just a mob movie—it's a symbolic exposé on elite corruption, the Vatican's shadow operations, and the cost of trying to escape a dark system. As May 2025 unfolds—with a new pope, public ceremonies, and quiet global power shifts—this film holds serious comms.
🕊️ 1. Vatican Corruption – Hidden in Plain Sight
Michael Corleone tries to “go legitimate” by buying into a Vatican-linked investment.
He discovers the Church is just as corrupt as the mob.
Decoder:
The Vatican is not a holy sanctuary—it’s a power hub.
Religious institutions have been infiltrated by banking elites.
“Holy” alliances mask financial crimes, cover-ups, and trafficking ops.
Now: Pope Francis fades. Pope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) enters.
➡ Symbolic exposure without a dramatic headline. Quiet reset.
- “Just When I Thought I Was Out…”
Michael: “They pull me back in.”
Trying to exit the system brings even deeper entanglement.
Decoder:
Reformers are targeted.
The system does not allow clean exits.
The illusion of freedom is maintained by spiritual blackmail.
Now: Is this symbolic of Trump’s re-entry arc? Or the Vatican pretending to change while still shielding secrets?
- Opera Assassination – Ritual in Plain Sight
The final scene happens during a grand opera performance.
Truth is revealed through music, spectacle, and distraction.
Decoder:
Truth hidden behind theater.
Public ritual masks elite sacrifice.
Only the awake see what’s happening between the scenes.
Now:
VE Day ceremonies
Middle East violence
Pope change + humanitarian headlines
➡ Could be cover for ritual transfer of power or blackmail collapse.
- Mary’s Death – The Cost of Innocence
Michael’s daughter is killed—symbolizing the death of purity and legacy.
Decoder:
Next generation is sacrificed for the sins of the system.
Grief awakens those who were blind.
Symbolic echo of trafficked youth, broken families, and betrayed trust.
Now: Trafficking rings are being quietly exposed.
Mary = The children. Michael = The world waking up too late.
Final Takeaway:
We are in the opera scene now.
The ritual is playing out.
Only the awake are watching both the performance and the shadows.
Babylon institution? The Catholic Church was the original Church established by Jesus & his Apostles. If you have a bible in your home, you have the Catholic Church to thank for it.
🙄 not this tired old falsehood again
The books in the New Testament were all written before the end of the first century (before AD 100). Michael Kruger, an expert in the formation of the canon of Scripture, describes the attitude of the church’s leaders in the period just after the apostles:
The apostles’ teachings were the basis for the formation of the earliest churches. The writings of the apostles were their teachings established in written documents.
Before long, however, other Christian writings were created by people. But these writings did not carry the same apostolic authority. Some of them even contained teachings that we contrary to what the apostles had taught.
In order to protect the early Christians from false teaching after the death of all the apostles, the early leaders clarified and delineated the apostolic writings. Kruger describes the historical reality:
By AD 170 the concept of the New Testament Canon was firmly established, and the main contents were set in place.
What gave the New Testament canon its authority is that it contained the teachings of Jesus given through his apostles or those closely associated with the apostles. Those teachings created the church. Then, between AD 250 and 367, the leaders of the church at that time met in councils to officially recognize the books that had been and were to continue to be the authoritative words of the apostles. They settled upon the twenty-seven books of the New Testament.
Here is a crucial point: these councils did not invent something new; rather, based on criteria such as apostolicity and historic church usage, they made official what had already been church practice and belief for centuries. They had no other choice. The New Testament was circulated among the churches long before the Catholic church even existed. The scarlet harlot in Rome needs to stop claiming things she has no right to claim.
*Michael Kruger, The Question of Canon (Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2013).
*Michael Kruger, The Canon Revisited: Establishing the Origins and Authority of the New Testament Books (Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway, 2012).
Jesus did NOT Establish the CATHOLIC Religion, that was Constantine....
Jesus did establish ""A"" Religion, but id not give it a Name....
Go, read his words, read the words of the apostles, nowhere will you find anyone Establishing the ROMAN Catholic Church other than in History Books, and those ALL say Constantine....
Ohhhhhhh so you're one of those people that think "true" Christianity didn't exist until you uncovered it in 2025? Got it...
And all 45,000 Protestant denominations have the fullness of the faith except the OLDEST Church that assembled the Bible who continues to have ALL 72 books?
You don't honestly believe that, do you?
NOWHERE, ABSOLUTELY NOWHERE IN THE BIBLE, does Jesus say the NAME of any ""RELIGION"", the closest he gets is ""THE FAITH"" and ""THE CHURCH"", but he NEVER says the ""Roman Catholic Apostolic Church"", at all, NEVER....
To make a Finer Point, he DID send out Letters, but to CHURCHES, and did NOT say they were ""CATHOLIC"" at all, ever, never ever....
IF you can PROVE ME WRONG, just name the BOOK PASSAGE AND SCRIPTURE from the Bible....
Show us all, WHERE is it written IN THE BIBLE???
Why is your bible missing 7 books thst 1st Century Jews didnt like? If you don't have the full bible, how can one claim to have the fullness of the faith?
Also, Why did Catholics, the Church that assembled the Bible, keep the 7 books that the 1st century Christ-killing Jews didnt?
It would seem that Protestants tend to side with the people who killed Christ more than they side with the early Church who followed Christ. Weird.
So funny that in one breath they say they’re Bible believing and in another say the church that put their Bible together is evil, a cult, etc.
They Removed one heck of a Lot, an only allowed what they could use to control the Masses....
But maybe you know more than the rest of us...
If that’s true, then why do you use it to justify your belief in God?
Because I look around and only see Gods Handy works everywhere....
Because after having read many parts of it, it helps when Reading Law, makes it easier to understand....
Because it's a Good History Book, that helps in Understanding International Law also...
Because without it we would probably not know that there's a Correlation between Nature, and Natures God, and Common Law, and can also be applied to Nations as Peoples....
It validates my belief in God, that I had BEFORE I read it....