I had a thought and I’d like feedback. Is it possible that we haven’t seen the Epstein files released yet because a large number of pedophilia incidents took place in DC and since DC is it’s own “country” we would need an AG that would actually be in Trump’s camp in order to prosecute?

These crazy 8 days sure do have a lot of happenings!

I take back what I said before. - that the rumor was bait.

Trump has now announced it (so it must have been one of the plans) + GWP gets a pass, once again.

they're taking everyone from Fox News, lol

I see Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham feeling jealous, the 2 dinosaurs from days long gone.

Awesome. And Trump got to expose a few rinos along the way. Let's see what Tillis and Co have to say when Trump nominates Pirro in a couple of months.

I knew he was gonna pull it and swap in another interim!

No way he was letting Bosebeeg pick.

He just set Tillis up for a Primary though!

Great news!!

Nice choice. I love it.

She was a hoot as a TV judge before! Buy popcorn!

I like her, and predict yet another meltdown. In fact, for a movie, this is a central casting choice.

I asked Grok about who has jurisdiction to prosecute crimes in DC. I think the majority of the pedophilia crimes happened in DC because you only have to control one AG, the DC one and POTUS appoints that and we all know that the uniparty has held that position. Trump appointed Pirro is a bigger deal than we know. Here is Grok’s response to my question. In Washington, DC, jurisdiction to prosecute egregious crimes depends on the nature and location of the offense: Local Crimes: The DC Office of the Attorney General (OAG) handles most local criminal prosecutions for violations of DC laws, such as assaults, theft, or local felonies, under the DC Code. The OAG’s Criminal Section, led by the Deputy Attorney General, oversees these cases, which are typically prosecuted in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Federal Crimes: The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia prosecutes federal crimes, including those involving federal laws (e.g., drug trafficking, firearms offenses, or terrorism) or crimes committed on federal property (e.g., Capitol grounds, National Mall). These cases are usually heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The U.S. Attorney’s Office also handles some serious local crimes, like murder or large-scale fraud, due to DC’s unique status as a federal district. Special Cases: Crimes on Federal Land: If the crime occurs on federal property (e.g., monuments, federal buildings), the U.S. Attorney’s Office typically has jurisdiction, often in collaboration with federal agencies like the FBI or U.S. Park Police. National Security or High-Profile Cases: For crimes like treason, espionage, or major public corruption, the Department of Justice (DOJ), through the U.S. Attorney’s Office or specialized DOJ units (e.g., National Security Division), takes the lead. Military Jurisdiction: Crimes committed by military personnel may fall under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and be handled by military courts, though civilian authorities could also have concurrent jurisdiction depending on the offense. Concurrent Jurisdiction: In some cases, both the DC OAG and the U.S. Attorney’s Office may have jurisdiction (e.g., certain violent crimes). They coordinate to determine who prosecutes, often based on severity or federal interest. Investigative Agencies: Agencies like the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) investigate local crimes, while federal agencies (FBI, Secret Service, Capitol Police) handle federal or high-profile cases. The investigating agency often influences who prosecutes. If the crime crosses state lines or involves international elements, the DOJ or federal prosecutors may take precedence, potentially involving other U.S. Attorney’s Offices or specialized task forces. For a specific crime, coordination between DC and federal authorities is common due to DC’s unique status as a federal district without full statehood. If you have a particular crime or location in mind, I can refine the answer further.

The stuff of nightmares. 😮🤣

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdOPBP9vuZA

I love judge Jeanine but just wanted to point out how all the Fox News people are going into DC appointments. Much like how we point out how it’s a rotating door between dc appointments and CNN/MSNBC anchors on the dem side.

Pretty impressive bio on Wikipedia (you have to adjust for the liberal bias). She looks GREAT for an age of 73. Still cracks like a whip, if her performance on Fox is any indication.

Ba Bam!!

That's got to scare some people

Pirro was named as a defendant in a February 2021 defamation lawsuit by Smartmatic. Pirro was among the hosts named in the Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox News Network defamation lawsuit for broadcasting false statements about the plaintiff company's voting machines. Fox News settled the case for $787.5 million and was required to acknowledge that the broadcast statements were false.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanine_Pirro

Does attorney - client privilege apply to her? Can she actually do the job considering the documents and names she saw during this process and that all of this can’t be disclosed by her?