The point here is to put 2 and 2 together. An antichrist isn’t going to tell the gospel story and say that Jesus is the Christ and the savior of the world. Regardless of whether Trump is authentic. pandering, acting, or emotionlessly reading a script, an antichrist isn’t going to acknowledge Jesus like that.
Hehe.. yeah..was a joke cos u said AC, I just added an O in the middle.. Oooh maybe it was Obama or Oprah and they got fired and the AC jumps to another puppet..hmm
Please tell her to read my story about Washington DC. I didn't believe the crazy stuff ether that's why I went to DC to go see the true, and like Doubting Thomas in the Bible I had to go see who was telling the truth... https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9WYu7nT/its-going-to-be-biblical/
There is literally videos of Donald Trump expressing boldly that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the savior of mankind. The Antichrist professes to literally BE Christ himself. He professes to be the returned Messiah.
The only things that irk me are symbolic. For example, this is a tasteless statue and should have never been built. Regardless of intent, its optics are horrible.
Well I've been reproving anyone calling trump a king, Ceasars, savior etc. Lots great men of God in the bible and in history. Only One God who has only one Son.
Well, there is no single Antichrist that rises up on the political stage of the world. The single Antichrist doctrine is a miss handling of the book of Revelation by those who interpret the book carnally. That is the simple answer. Personally I reject all carnal interpretation of the book of Revelation. The carnal doctrines are hard to shake if that has been your diet.
Totally get where you're coming from... but just curious - if there’s no singular Antichrist, how do you reconcile passages like 2 Thessalonians 2 where Paul talks about “the man of lawlessness” being revealed? That sure sounds like an individual figure, not just a system. Revelation isn't meant to be read carnally, agreed - but it is meant to be read contextually. Ignoring the plain grammatical-historical reading can lead us just as far off as over-literalizing symbols.
Yes, I'm back 7 months.........then it went reload on me. My phone has trouble going back that far. I found the challenge from Swamprangers, pinned it, then got booted.
Yes, I'm trying to address the single Antichrist that people stick into the book of Revelation. I did it once for Swamprangers, 7 months ago, apparently. It takes like 5 minutes or 10 for my phone to fo back that far.
Do you believe that Jesus physically returns to earth during the time the Book of Revelation depicts?
Physically, like you could put your arm around him and get a selfie.
Acts 1:10 They were looking intently into the sky as He was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11“Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen Him go into heaven.”…
I've read the book of Revelation hundreds of times. There is no physical return in the book of Revelation. Theologians don't put a physical return in the book. They simply say the new creation is physical in the book. I disagree with the Theologians.
For a physical return you will have to use another text, like perhaps the Gospels. But Jesus doesn't ever say he's returning physically in the Gospels. Acts alludes to it in the 1st chapter and then never mentions such a thing again.
I'm not against a physical return. Show it to me in scripture. I am against mishandling the scriptures and putting in doctrines that the text doesn't support.
I couldn't find the 2 thees work I did.
I'll ask Swamprangers if he has it. He keeps stuff like that on my doctrine. I'm a study of his. :)
There were and are other anti-christs, i.e people who operate in the same way, who believe themselves to be in Christ's position instead of Jesus; who are the gods of their own lives (this encompasses athiests and satanists) or who believe themselves to be the gods of other peoples' lives (this encompasses Muslims and the Catholic Crusaders, "convert or die"). The Jesus-rejecting Jews have put their rabbis and traditions in Christ's position (Christ explained the Scriptures yet they look to their Rabbis and Talmud). I could go on. There are many anti-christs. The chief, big-dog anti-christ sits on a throne in Vatican City and claims to be the head of all christians worldwide, and also claims to have authority over all world leaders (temporal powers of the pope) as defined in Unam Sanctum.
Because the prophets say he is not. Prophets like Amanda Grace, Julie Green of Julie Green Ministries, Hank Kunneman, Troy Black, Kent Christmas, and Robin Bullock. He is God’s David of this time. God uses tough men to do tough jobs, not perfect men. Their imperfections are their strengths. He was raised by God-fearing parents. He raised solid good men and women. God has always spoke through the prophets. Many people think that Jesus is a prophet - we should get all info directly from Him. However Jesus is not a prophet - He is God. He is the third- the Trinity. God is the same yesterday today and tomorrow - God uses prophets to let us know what’s going on and nothing has changed. Jesus loves Donald Trump! That’s good enough for me.
God tells us everything thst pertains to life and Godliness in the Wordnof God itself. I don't trust any of those supposed listed prophets. First of all theybgey the glory all the time and muchnof what theybsay has been proven false with time.
I can't believe all this hubbub. As Christians, we are enjoined to interpret all with charity. This is the origin of the legal principle: innocent until proven guilty. Can she prove Trump is the anti-Christ? If not, let it rest. Insisting that anyone prove their innocence is a perversion of justice.
1 John 2:22 says that an antichrist denies that Jesus is the Christ.
Here’s one instance of Trump talking about Jesus. There are other instances of this that have happened since where Trump talks about Jesus.
The point here is to put 2 and 2 together. An antichrist isn’t going to tell the gospel story and say that Jesus is the Christ and the savior of the world. Regardless of whether Trump is authentic. pandering, acting, or emotionlessly reading a script, an antichrist isn’t going to acknowledge Jesus like that.
The Antichrist will NOT confess that 'Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior' like Trump has done many, many times.
Judge a tree by it's fruit.
It's not difficult.
☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻
This.
AC comes out of obscurity to the world stage and power (unknown before that).
AC does not regard (acknowledge/worship) the God of his Fathers.
AC doesn’t like, isn’t interested in women.
AC blasphemes God. Demand to be worshipped as God.
AC makes war against the saints (Christians) and conquers them.
Etc….all things Pres. DJT is not.
As others have said…judging fruit is necessary.
Maybe it’s AOC! Kek
Actually, Y. N. Harari is my frontrunner. 👹
Hehe.. yeah..was a joke cos u said AC, I just added an O in the middle.. Oooh maybe it was Obama or Oprah and they got fired and the AC jumps to another puppet..hmm
🙈 it took me a minute too bc I thought the same thing and then couldn't get it out my head lol
😁
I've never heard Trump deny Christ. In fact he clearly has embraced the Son of God.
Please tell her to read my story about Washington DC. I didn't believe the crazy stuff ether that's why I went to DC to go see the true, and like Doubting Thomas in the Bible I had to go see who was telling the truth... https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9WYu7nT/its-going-to-be-biblical/
There is literally videos of Donald Trump expressing boldly that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the savior of mankind. The Antichrist professes to literally BE Christ himself. He professes to be the returned Messiah.
The only things that irk me are symbolic. For example, this is a tasteless statue and should have never been built. Regardless of intent, its optics are horrible.
https://x.com/patriottakes/status/1888932194418057259
At Mar-a-Lago, a bizarre, golden-hoofed goat idol is on display.
The idol is wrapped in Trump $100 bills that say, “In Trump we Trust,” replacing God with Trump.
The idols’ base says, “I love you” along with Trump’s signature.
Freaky and in very poor taste IMHO. I wouldn't have it but then I wouldn't eat frog legs or fish eggs either.
Frog legs are delicious!
The drumsticks are kind of pricey for what you get. :-)
Really I've never eaten frog legs or caviar. I was commenting on the 'Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous' I guess.
I live in deep south Louisiana lol. Frog legs are common here. Definitely not fancy like caviar
Well I've been reproving anyone calling trump a king, Ceasars, savior etc. Lots great men of God in the bible and in history. Only One God who has only one Son.
Trump has basically said "There is a God and it's not me!"
The 'anti-rick' so to speak
Well, there is no single Antichrist that rises up on the political stage of the world. The single Antichrist doctrine is a miss handling of the book of Revelation by those who interpret the book carnally. That is the simple answer. Personally I reject all carnal interpretation of the book of Revelation. The carnal doctrines are hard to shake if that has been your diet.
Totally get where you're coming from... but just curious - if there’s no singular Antichrist, how do you reconcile passages like 2 Thessalonians 2 where Paul talks about “the man of lawlessness” being revealed? That sure sounds like an individual figure, not just a system. Revelation isn't meant to be read carnally, agreed - but it is meant to be read contextually. Ignoring the plain grammatical-historical reading can lead us just as far off as over-literalizing symbols.
Just some food for thought 🍽👀
I should have pinned it. It's like looking for a needle in a haystack here:
https://communities.win/c/RevelationOfJesusChrist
I'll find it though. Thanks for your patience.
Are you still looking? I’m interested in your study. But this is a lot to sift through!
Yes, I'm back 7 months.........then it went reload on me. My phone has trouble going back that far. I found the challenge from Swamprangers, pinned it, then got booted.
I'm close.
:) thanks for your patience.
A man of lawless Ness is a type of person. Look around, many are revealed.
I've explained 2 Thessalonians before. I'll look it up for you. I should be able to find the thread.
There are many anti-Christs already in the world. They deny that Jesus will physically return to this earth as the Bible plainly states several times.
Yes, I'm trying to address the single Antichrist that people stick into the book of Revelation. I did it once for Swamprangers, 7 months ago, apparently. It takes like 5 minutes or 10 for my phone to fo back that far.
Do you believe that Jesus physically returns to earth during the time the Book of Revelation depicts? Physically, like you could put your arm around him and get a selfie.
YES!
Acts 1:10 They were looking intently into the sky as He was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11“Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen Him go into heaven.”…
Of course and that's what I believe too.
I was asking SovereignSon. I won't speak for him about his beliefs on this but he doesn't see Revelation the way I do.
Agree!
I've read the book of Revelation hundreds of times. There is no physical return in the book of Revelation. Theologians don't put a physical return in the book. They simply say the new creation is physical in the book. I disagree with the Theologians.
For a physical return you will have to use another text, like perhaps the Gospels. But Jesus doesn't ever say he's returning physically in the Gospels. Acts alludes to it in the 1st chapter and then never mentions such a thing again.
I'm not against a physical return. Show it to me in scripture. I am against mishandling the scriptures and putting in doctrines that the text doesn't support.
I couldn't find the 2 thees work I did.
I'll ask Swamprangers if he has it. He keeps stuff like that on my doctrine. I'm a study of his. :)
Correct. It's a succession of men, who occupy the office of anti-christ. https://files.catbox.moe/ce5vd8.jpeg
There were and are other anti-christs, i.e people who operate in the same way, who believe themselves to be in Christ's position instead of Jesus; who are the gods of their own lives (this encompasses athiests and satanists) or who believe themselves to be the gods of other peoples' lives (this encompasses Muslims and the Catholic Crusaders, "convert or die"). The Jesus-rejecting Jews have put their rabbis and traditions in Christ's position (Christ explained the Scriptures yet they look to their Rabbis and Talmud). I could go on. There are many anti-christs. The chief, big-dog anti-christ sits on a throne in Vatican City and claims to be the head of all christians worldwide, and also claims to have authority over all world leaders (temporal powers of the pope) as defined in Unam Sanctum.
Because the prophets say he is not. Prophets like Amanda Grace, Julie Green of Julie Green Ministries, Hank Kunneman, Troy Black, Kent Christmas, and Robin Bullock. He is God’s David of this time. God uses tough men to do tough jobs, not perfect men. Their imperfections are their strengths. He was raised by God-fearing parents. He raised solid good men and women. God has always spoke through the prophets. Many people think that Jesus is a prophet - we should get all info directly from Him. However Jesus is not a prophet - He is God. He is the third- the Trinity. God is the same yesterday today and tomorrow - God uses prophets to let us know what’s going on and nothing has changed. Jesus loves Donald Trump! That’s good enough for me.
God tells us everything thst pertains to life and Godliness in the Wordnof God itself. I don't trust any of those supposed listed prophets. First of all theybgey the glory all the time and muchnof what theybsay has been proven false with time.
I can't believe all this hubbub. As Christians, we are enjoined to interpret all with charity. This is the origin of the legal principle: innocent until proven guilty. Can she prove Trump is the anti-Christ? If not, let it rest. Insisting that anyone prove their innocence is a perversion of justice.
Here https://files.catbox.moe/ce5vd8.jpeg