I appreciate the input, and your point about the decisions made in the past to help set up this system is related, but this model is only looking at the Minnesota system (and the parties currently involved in it) in a limited way (a state-level model).
The model is simply looking (very loosely) at the system in Minnesota as a state-level criminal enterprise, hence its limited.
It would take years and hundreds of pages to even begin to map all the tentacles and factors of the larger system of which Minnesota is a small part, the globalist system and the national systems.
But if you DID want to include a link to the Corrupt Us Presidents (both democrat and republican), you could simply draw a line from the Cabal at the top, who controlled and positioned and utilized corrupt US Presidents. As far as Minnesota is concerned, the president themselves are not part of THIS pyramid, imo.
If you made a National Level model, you'd put the Presidents and congress under the Cabal but over the other layers.
The model could be improved by adding "NGOs" (501c3 Orgs) in the same tier as the "somali operators" I think.
Hmmmm. I don't know. I'm inclined to think that the Intel Comm (Mossad, CIA, etc) would have a role but an auxiliary one. Setting up the gangs, for example, or facilitating. But, I guess the framework I am thinking about here is re: the key operating blocks within the state structure.
I really only include the Cabal at the top, because that's a hidden factor. I'd include any of the corrupt Intel communities are part of that. Because I do not think that the intel communities would be a) doing enforcer work, b) conducting fraud specifically, c) providing protection in the way the political class has (allegedly) been doing, or d) operating as a grassroots social justice network to protect the other layers and keep out potential legitimate federal influence.
Certainly, you could create a much large map, and include all sorts of links, connections. After all, the corrupt Establishment, of which this is a part, is a massive web.
The approach I have chosen is to look at WHAT is being done in Minnesota NOW, and by who.
From a mapping point of view, you have to have the general concepts you are attempting to illustrate, rather than trying to fit everything in any one model. The limitation is important, otherwise you end up endlessly trying to cover everything.
To wit, I do not know that Minnesota would have any significantly numbered intel operatives actively playing a large role in the fraud/corruption/funding work. They'd more likely outsource it to the fourth level.
This doesn't mean they aren't connected, but this map is attempting to simply identify the main blocks that form the corrupt structure.
You have to put in Dem Presidents along with cartels at the top. They decided which nation's peoples to import and where in the US to put them!
Somalis: ME, MN,OH etc.
I appreciate the input, and your point about the decisions made in the past to help set up this system is related, but this model is only looking at the Minnesota system (and the parties currently involved in it) in a limited way (a state-level model).
The model is simply looking (very loosely) at the system in Minnesota as a state-level criminal enterprise, hence its limited.
It would take years and hundreds of pages to even begin to map all the tentacles and factors of the larger system of which Minnesota is a small part, the globalist system and the national systems.
But if you DID want to include a link to the Corrupt Us Presidents (both democrat and republican), you could simply draw a line from the Cabal at the top, who controlled and positioned and utilized corrupt US Presidents. As far as Minnesota is concerned, the president themselves are not part of THIS pyramid, imo.
If you made a National Level model, you'd put the Presidents and congress under the Cabal but over the other layers.
The model could be improved by adding "NGOs" (501c3 Orgs) in the same tier as the "somali operators" I think.
This model fits with what I have seen and believe.
Don't forget the CIA, MOSSAD, etc., which I think would fit between the first and second levels.
Hmmmm. I don't know. I'm inclined to think that the Intel Comm (Mossad, CIA, etc) would have a role but an auxiliary one. Setting up the gangs, for example, or facilitating. But, I guess the framework I am thinking about here is re: the key operating blocks within the state structure.
I really only include the Cabal at the top, because that's a hidden factor. I'd include any of the corrupt Intel communities are part of that. Because I do not think that the intel communities would be a) doing enforcer work, b) conducting fraud specifically, c) providing protection in the way the political class has (allegedly) been doing, or d) operating as a grassroots social justice network to protect the other layers and keep out potential legitimate federal influence.
Certainly, you could create a much large map, and include all sorts of links, connections. After all, the corrupt Establishment, of which this is a part, is a massive web.
The approach I have chosen is to look at WHAT is being done in Minnesota NOW, and by who.
From a mapping point of view, you have to have the general concepts you are attempting to illustrate, rather than trying to fit everything in any one model. The limitation is important, otherwise you end up endlessly trying to cover everything.
To wit, I do not know that Minnesota would have any significantly numbered intel operatives actively playing a large role in the fraud/corruption/funding work. They'd more likely outsource it to the fourth level.
This doesn't mean they aren't connected, but this map is attempting to simply identify the main blocks that form the corrupt structure.