Hmmmm. I don't know. I'm inclined to think that the Intel Comm (Mossad, CIA, etc) would have a role but an auxiliary one. Setting up the gangs, for example, or facilitating. But, I guess the framework I am thinking about here is re: the key operating blocks within the state structure.
I really only include the Cabal at the top, because that's a hidden factor. I'd include any of the corrupt Intel communities are part of that. Because I do not think that the intel communities would be a) doing enforcer work, b) conducting fraud specifically, c) providing protection in the way the political class has (allegedly) been doing, or d) operating as a grassroots social justice network to protect the other layers and keep out potential legitimate federal influence.
Certainly, you could create a much large map, and include all sorts of links, connections. After all, the corrupt Establishment, of which this is a part, is a massive web.
The approach I have chosen is to look at WHAT is being done in Minnesota NOW, and by who.
From a mapping point of view, you have to have the general concepts you are attempting to illustrate, rather than trying to fit everything in any one model. The limitation is important, otherwise you end up endlessly trying to cover everything.
To wit, I do not know that Minnesota would have any significantly numbered intel operatives actively playing a large role in the fraud/corruption/funding work. They'd more likely outsource it to the fourth level.
This doesn't mean they aren't connected, but this map is attempting to simply identify the main blocks that form the corrupt structure.
Hmmmm. I don't know. I'm inclined to think that the Intel Comm (Mossad, CIA, etc) would have a role but an auxiliary one. Setting up the gangs, for example, or facilitating. But, I guess the framework I am thinking about here is re: the key operating blocks within the state structure.
I really only include the Cabal at the top, because that's a hidden factor. I'd include any of the corrupt Intel communities are part of that. Because I do not think that the intel communities would be a) doing enforcer work, b) conducting fraud specifically, c) providing protection in the way the political class has (allegedly) been doing, or d) operating as a grassroots social justice network to protect the other layers and keep out potential legitimate federal influence.
Certainly, you could create a much large map, and include all sorts of links, connections. After all, the corrupt Establishment, of which this is a part, is a massive web.
The approach I have chosen is to look at WHAT is being done in Minnesota NOW, and by who.
From a mapping point of view, you have to have the general concepts you are attempting to illustrate, rather than trying to fit everything in any one model. The limitation is important, otherwise you end up endlessly trying to cover everything.
To wit, I do not know that Minnesota would have any significantly numbered intel operatives actively playing a large role in the fraud/corruption/funding work. They'd more likely outsource it to the fourth level.
This doesn't mean they aren't connected, but this map is attempting to simply identify the main blocks that form the corrupt structure.