In DC right now there exists a state of emergency. FEMA has full legal authority under such conditions to suspend the constitution (i.e. declare martial law). I am not saying that's the play, but it is legal and currently active.
Any other path to martial law would be considered a coup, but it is also a viable path and SCOTUS can say nothing. Well, they can complain all they want, but a coup is a coup and military control is absolute unless and until We The People fight them.
The most important point is that such a coup would still be constitutional, as the military swears to uphold the constitution, not the President. I.e. if they have evidence that suggests the President is acting against the constitution, that it meets some threshold of proof, and the rest of the system has failed to constitutionally resolve the issue, they are constitutionally bound to declare martial law and suspend the authority of the unconstitutional government until the constitutional crisis is resolved.
Our constitution is really difficult to subvert. Its probably the greatest document ever written by humankind.
In DC right now there exists a state of emergency. FEMA has full legal authority under such conditions to suspend the constitution (i.e. declare martial law). I am not saying that's the play, but it is legal and currently active.
Any other path to martial law would be considered a coup, but it is also a viable path and SCOTUS can say nothing. Well, they can complain all they want, but a coup is a coup and military control is absolute unless and until We The People fight them.
The most important point is that such a coup would still be constitutional, as the military swears to uphold the constitution, not the President. I.e. if they have evidence that suggests the President is acting against the constitution, that it meets some threshold of proof, and the rest of the system has failed to constitutionally resolve the issue, they are constitutionally bound to declare martial law and suspend the authority of the unconstitutional government until the constitutional crisis is resolved.
Our constitution is really difficult to subvert. Its probably the greatest document ever written by humankind.
In DC right now there exists a state of emergency, FEMA has full legal authority, under such conditions, to suspend the constitution (i.e. declare martial law). I am not saying that's the play, but it is legal and currently active.
Any other path to martial law would be considered a coup, but it is also a viable path and SCOTUS can say nothing. Well, they can complain all they want, but a coup is a coup and military control is absolute unless and until We The People fight them.
The most important point is that such a coup would still be constitutional, as the military swears to uphold the constitution, not the President. I.e. if they have evidence that suggests the President is acting against the constitution, that it meets some threshold of proof, and the rest of the system has failed to constitutionally resolve the issue, they are constitutionally bound to declare martial law and suspend the authority of the unconstitutional government until the constitutional crisis is resolved.
Our constitution is really difficult to subvert. Its probably the greatest document ever written by humankind.
In DC right now there exists a state of emergency, FEMA has full legal authority, under such conditions, to suspend the constitution (i.e. declare martial law). I am not saying that's the play, but it is legal and currently active.
Any other path to martial law would be considered a coup, but it is also a viable path and SCOTUS can say nothing. Well, they can complain all they want, but a coup is a coup and military control is absolute unless and until We The People fight them.
The most important point is that such a coup would still be constitutional, as the military swears to uphold the constitution, not the President. I.e. if they have evidence that suggests the President is acting against the constitution and it meets some threshold of proof and the rest of the system has failed to address this issue, they are constitutionally bound to declare martial law and suspend the authority of the unconstitutional government until the constitutional crisis is resolved.
Our constitution is really difficult to subvert. Its probably the greatest document ever written by humankind.
In DC right now there exists a state of emergency, FEMA has full legal authority, under such conditions, to suspend the constitution (i.e. declare martial law). I am not saying that's the play, but it is legal and currently active.
Any other path to martial law would be considered a coup, but it is also a viable path and SCOTUS can say nothing. Well, they can complain all they want, but a coup is a coup and military control is absolute unless and until We The People fight them.
The most important point is that such a coup would still be constitutional, as the military swears to uphold the constitution, not the President, i.e. if they have evidence that suggests the President is acting against the constitution and it meets some threshold of proof, they are constitutionally bound to declare martial law and suspend the authority of the unconstitutional government until the constitutional crisis is resolved.
Our constitution is really difficult to subvert. Its probably the greatest document ever written by humankind.
In DC right now there exists a state of emergency, FEMA has full legal authority, under such conditions, to suspend the constitution (i.e. declare martial law). I am not saying that's the play, but it is legal and currently active.
Any other path to martial law would be considered a coup, but it is also a viable path and SCOTUS can say nothing. Well, they can complain all they want, but a coup is a coup and military control is absolute unless and until We The People fight them.
The most important point is that such a coup would still be constitutional, as the military swears to uphold the constitution, not the President, i.e. if they have evidence that suggests the President is acting against the constitution and it meets some threshold of proof, they are constitutionally bound to declare martial law and suspend the authority of the unconstitutional government until the constitutional crisis is resolved.
In DC right now there exists a state of emergency, FEMA has full legal authority, under such conditions, to suspend the constitution (i.e. declare martial law). I am not saying that's the play, but it is legal and currently active.
Any other path to martial law would be considered a coup, but it is also a viable path and SCOTUS can say nothing. Well, they can complain all they want, but a coup is a coup and military control is absolute unless and until We The People fight them.
The most important point is that such a coup would still be constitutional, as the military swears to uphold the constitution, not the President, i.e. if they have evidence that suggests the President is acting against the constitution and it meets some threshold of proof, they are constitutionally bound to declare martial law and suspend the authority of the unconstitutional government.
In DC right now there exists a state of emergency, FEMA has full legal authority, under such conditions, to suspend the constitution (i.e. declare martial law). I am not saying that's the play, but it is legal and currently active.
Any other path to martial law would be considered a coup, but it is also a viable path and SCOTUS can say nothing. Well, they can complain all they want, but a coup is a coup and military control is absolute unless and until We The People fight them.
The most important point is that such a coup would still be constitutional, as the military swears to uphold the constitution, not the President, i.e. if they have evidence that suggests the President is acting against the constitution and it meets some threshold of proof, they are constitutionally bound to declare martial law.