OK so I'm analytical but hear me out. IMHO our perceptions are being inadvertently driven by the technique this patriot is using to create the meme.

The exception is the giant red Q on the helmet. It's compelling and in your face. Whatever the plausible deniability alibi is for that one, they are pumping Q, and it is Grade A hopium. Thanks OP!!

As to the other part: Suppose the number painted on the aircraft had been a different number than 35. Then, the Q post that goes with that number, instead of Q35, would absolutely get scrutinized, in an attempt to see if we could make it fit either current events or what we hope and pray is happening right now. And chances are fairly good that we'd be able to.

That arbitrary approach leads inevitably to false conclusions IMO, in the absence of any compelling, factual reason to believe that the way specific aircraft are chosen for a mission is so their number matches the number of a Q drop from years ago, on what appears to be a random date. In this case, Nov. 1, 2017, or 1217 days earlier not counting 3/2/21, the date of the tweet. (Nov. 1 of WHAT year?? Twelve hundred and HOW many days??? Kek :)

Meaning my analytical left brain doesn't see how we get to automatically assign significance TODAY to a post from 2017, because of a number painted on the side of an aircraft and because we like how we can make the wording match up with current events. It questions how the use of this technique of searching for meaning in a given number (which humans are good at, like seeing faces in random objects) gets us closer to understanding reality.

That Q helmet though. Man! QUT AND PRQUD.

Feedback welcome :)

OK so I'm analytical but hear me out. IMHO our perceptions are being inadvertently driven by the technique this patriot is using to create the meme.

(The exception is the giant red Q on the helmet. It's compelling and in your face. Whatever the plausible deniability alibi is for that one, they are pumping Q, and it is Grade A hopium. :)

As to the other part: Suppose the number painted on the aircraft had been a different number than 35. Then, the Q post that goes with that number, instead of Q35, would absolutely get scrutinized, in an attempt to see if we could make it fit either current events or what we hope and pray is happening right now. And chances are fairly good that we'd be able to.

That arbitrary approach leads inevitably to false conclusions IMO, in the absence of any compelling, factual reason to believe that the way specific aircraft are chosen for a mission is so their number matches the number of a Q drop from years ago, on what appears to be a random date. In this case, Nov. 1, 2017, or 1217 days earlier not counting 3/2/21, the date of the tweet. (Nov. 1 of WHAT year?? Twelve hundred and HOW many days??? Kek :)

Meaning my analytical left brain doesn't see how we get to automatically assign significance TODAY to a post from 2017, because of a number painted on the side of an aircraft and because we like how we can make the wording match up with current events. It questions how the use of this technique of searching for meaning in a given number (which humans are good at, like seeing faces in random objects) gets us closer to understanding reality.

That Q helmet though. Man! QUT AND PRQUD.

Feedback welcome :)

OK so I'm analytical but hear me out. IMHO our perceptions are being inadvertently driven by the technique this patriot is using to create the meme.

(The exception is the giant red Q on the helmet. It's compelling and in your face. Whatever the plausible deniability alibi is for that one, they are pumping Q, and it is Grade A hopium. :)

As to the other part: Suppose the number painted on the aircraft had been a different number than 35. Then, the Q post that goes with that number, instead of Q35, would absolutely get scrutinized, in an attempt to see if we could make it fit either current events or what we hope and pray is happening right now. And chances are fairly good that we'd be able to.

That arbitrary approach leads inevitably to false conclusions IMO, in the absence of any compelling, factual reason to believe that the way specific aircraft are chosen for a mission is so their number matches the number of a Q drop from years ago, on what appears to be a random date. In this case, Nov. 1, 2017, or 1217 days earlier not counting 3/2/21, the date of the tweet. (Nov. 1 of WHAT year?? Twelve hundred and HOW many days??? Kek :)

Meaning my analytical left brain doesn't see how we get to automatically assign significance TODAY to a post from 2017, because of a number painted on the side of an aircraft and because we like how we can make the wording match up with current events. It questions how the use of this technique of searching for meaning in random numbers (which humans are good at, like seeing faces in random objects) gets us closer to understanding reality.

That Q helmet though. Man! QUT AND PRQUD.

Feedback welcome :)

OK so I'm analytical but hear me out. IMHO our perceptions are being inadvertently driven by the technique this patriot is using to create the meme.

(The exception is the giant red Q on the helmet. It's compelling and in your face. Whatever the plausible deniability alibi is for that one, they are pumping Q, and it is Grade A hopium. :)

As to the other part: Suppose the number painted on the aircraft had been a different number than 35. Then, the Q post that goes with that number, instead of Q35, would absolutely get scrutinized, in an attempt to see if we could make it fit either current events or what we hope and pray is happening right now. And chances are fairly good that we'd be able to.

That arbitrary approach leads inevitably to false conclusions IMO, in the absence of any compelling, factual reason to believe that the way specific aircraft are chosen for a mission is so their number matches the number of a Q drop from years ago, on what appears to be a random date. In this case, Nov. 1, 2017, or 1217 days earlier not counting 3/2/21, the date of the tweet. (Nov. 1 of WHAT year?? Twelve hundred and HOW many days??? Kek :)

Meaning my analytical left brain doesn't see how we get to automatically assign significance TODAY to a post from 2017, because of a number painted on the side of an aircraft and because we like how we can make the wording match up with current events. It questions how use of this technique of searching for meaning in random numbers (which humans are good at, like seeing faces in random objects) gets us closer to understanding reality.

That Q helmet though. Man! QUT AND PRQUD.

Feedback welcome :)