what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my/somebody's other nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.

Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.

People which question and blur basic conceptions of culture and try to change words meaning to blur words (read 1984 - especially things about double-speak) are no better than mass murderers and those child raping monsters - because they guarantee them impunity and lack of punishment from the masses by blinding people and blunting morality of the society.

what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my/somebody's other nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.

Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.

People which question and blur basic conceptions of culture and try to change words meaning to blur words are no better than mass murderers and those child raping monsters - because they guarantee them impunity and lack of punishment from the masses by blinding people.

what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my/somebody's other nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.

Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.

People which question and blur basic conceptions of culture and try to change words meaning to blur words are no better than mass murderers and those child raping monsters - because they guarantee them impunity and lack of punishment from the masses by blinding the masses.

what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my/somebody's other nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.

Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom. People which question and blur basic conceptions of our culture are no better than mass murderers and those child raping monsters - because they guarantee them impunity and lack of punishment from the masses.

what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my/somebody's other nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.

Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.

what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my/somebody's other nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.

Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.

what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.

Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.

what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.

Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.

what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.

Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.

what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.

I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)

Your freedom ends where my nose begins.

Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".

• it is more definite
• it is clear example
• not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.