Silver has been the primary market manipulator for over 150 years. For all of history its value relative to gold has closely matched their respective availabilities (10:1). This changed over 200 years ago when the first Central Bank was created in America by the Rothschilds (1810ish?). It went from around 10:1 gold:silver price to 15:1. This was the first silver manipulation.

Most people had silver, the very wealthy stored their wealth in gold. This market manipulation further separated the two groups. It remained at 15:1 until the coinage act of 1873 when money was no longer tied to both gold and silver, and became tied to only gold. This instantly made an even bigger jump in the gold:silver ratio and subsequently the wealth of the rich v. the average person.

This trend continued, through various acts and restructuring of our financial system (Federal Reserve, Stock Market, Acts, Laws, edicts, etc.) until about 1933 when the separation became about what it is today ~75:1. It has varied between 50:1 - 100:1 throughout that time. This has been done to manipulate markets. It has very little (probably nothing) to do with real supply and demand.

In the past 100 years the demand for silver has increased over the demand for gold. Our technology uses silver for its superior thermal and electrical properties. In a normal market the price of silver would have increased relative to gold. In our market it has only fluctuated up and down, regardless of use.

Once we throw off our Luciferian chains, the prices of these metals will adjust to their real value. If we use them in a new precious metals standard the price will stabalize and inflation will become related only to availability of the metals. Deflation is even possible, but really, things like inflation and deflation are not really important unless it is a huge variance.

In my estimation the price of silver to gold will probably be in the 10:1 ratio again, which makes silver a much better investment than gold. Nevertheless, the price of gold is probably substantially suppressed. When you look at inflation adjusted values of gold and silver the prices should be around 10k/oz for gold and 1k/oz for silver. If you look at it relative to other metrics (like debt, or availability on a global scale) these values can become even higher in real purchasing value.

Silver has been the primary market manipulator for over 150 years. For all of history its value has closely matched its availability. This changed over 200 years ago when the first Central Bank was created in America by the Rothschilds (1810ish?). It went from around 10:1 gold:silver price to 15:1. This was the first silver manipulation.

Most people had silver, the very wealthy stored their wealth in gold. This market manipulation further separated the two groups. It remained at 15:1 until the coinage act of 1873 when money was no longer tied to both gold and silver, and became tied to only gold. This instantly made an even bigger jump in the gold:silver ratio and subsequently the wealth of the rich v. the average person.

This trend continued, through various acts and restructuring of our financial system (Federal Reserve, Stock Market, Acts, Laws, edicts, etc.) until about 1933 when the separation became about what it is today ~75:1. It has varied between 50:1 - 100:1 throughout that time. This has been done to manipulate markets. It has very little (probably nothing) to do with real supply and demand.

In the past 100 years the demand for silver has increased over the demand for gold. Our technology uses silver for its superior thermal and electrical properties. In a normal market the price of silver would have increased relative to gold. In our market it has only fluctuated up and down, regardless of use.

Once we throw off our Luciferian chains, the prices of these metals will adjust to their real value. If we use them in a new precious metals standard the price will stabalize and inflation will become related only to availability of the metals. Deflation is even possible, but really, things like inflation and deflation are not really important unless it is a huge variance.

In my estimation the price of silver to gold will probably be in the 10:1 ratio again, which makes silver a much better investment than gold. Nevertheless, the price of gold is probably substantially suppressed. When you look at inflation adjusted values of gold and silver the prices should be around 10k/oz for gold and 1k/oz for silver. If you look at it relative to other metrics (like debt, or availability on a global scale) these values can become even higher in real purchasing value.

Silver has been the primary market manipulator for over 150 years. For all of history its value has closely matched its availability. This changed over 200 years ago when the first Central Bank was created in America by the Rothschilds (1810ish?). It went from around 10:1 gold:silver price to 15:1. This was the first silver manipulation.

Most people had silver, the very wealthy stored their wealth in gold. This market manipulation further separated the two groups. It remained at 15:1 until the coinage act of 1873 when money was no longer tied to both gold and silver, and became tied to only gold. This instantly made an even bigger jump in the gold:silver ratio and subsequently the wealth of the rich v. the average person.

This trend continued, through various acts and restructuring of our financial system (Federal Reserve, Stock Market, Acts, Laws, edicts, etc.) until about 1933 when the separation became about what it is today ~75:1. It has varied between 50:1 - 100:1 throughout that time. This has been done to manipulate markets. It has very little (probably nothing) to do with real supply and demand.

In the past 100 years the demand for silver has increased over the demand for gold. Our technology uses silver for its superior thermal and electrical properties. In a normal market the price of silver would have increased relative to gold. In our market it has only fluctuated up and down, regardless of use.

Once we throw off our Luciferian chains, the prices of these metals will adjust to their real value. If we use them in a new precious metals standard the price will stabalize and inflation will become related only to availability of the metals. Deflation is even possible, but really, things like inflation and deflation are not really important unless it is a huge variance.

In my estimation the price of silver to gold will probably be in the 10:1 ratio again, which makes silver a much better investment than gold. Nevertheless, the price of gold is probably substantially suppressed. When you look at inflation adjusted values of gold and silver the prices should be around 10k/oz for gold and 1k/oz for silver. If you look at it relative to other metrics (like debt, or availability on a global scale) these values can become even higher in real purchasing value.