Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

The vaccinated will be the dangerous ones, but they will still blame us.

This could be the catalyst for the “2nd wave” they taunted us about. Bill Gates couldn’t hide a sadistic smile while alluding to it.

The “leaky” vaccine makes the virus grow stronger, affecting mostly free thinkers. Us. They are potentially forcing us between a rock and a hard place.

I lean towards this not being the case, as this could have been the reason Trump released the vaccine so fast. So he would know what was in it, and thusly thwarted the “leaky” vaccine diabolical plan. It’s probably a tenth as bad as it could have been. Worse than the virus, but not nearly as lethal as it could have been. That’s my most plausible hope.

It’s the only hope that makes sense of his willingness to advertise it so much. Chess that isn’t world-ending like it may have been.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

The vaccinated will be the dangerous ones, but they will still blame us.

This could be the catalyst for the “2nd wave” they taunted us about. Bill Gates couldn’t hide a sadistic smile while alluding to it.

The “leaky” vaccine makes the virus grow stronger, affecting mostly free thinkers. Us. They are potentially forcing us between a rock and a hard place.

I lean towards this not being the case, as this could have been the reason Trump released the vaccine so fast. So he would know what was in it, and thusly thwarted the “leaky” vaccine diabolical plan. It’s probably a tenth as bad as it could have been. Worse than the virus, but not nearly as lethal as it could have been. That’s my most plausible hope.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

The vaccinated will be the dangerous ones, but they will still blame us.

This could be the catalyst for the “2nd wave” they taunted us about. Bill Gates couldn’t hide a sadistic smile while alluding to it.

The “leaky” vaccine makes the virus grow stronger, affecting mostly free thinkers. Us. They are potentially forcing us between a rock and a hard place.

I lean towards this not being the case, as this could have been the reason Trump released the vaccine so fast. So he would know what was in it, and thusly thwarted the “leaky” vaccine diabolical plan. It’s probably a tenth as bad as it could have been.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

The vaccinated will be the dangerous ones, but they will still blame us.

This could be the catalyst for the “2nd wave” they taunted us about. Bill Gates couldn’t hide a sadistic smile while alluding to it.

The “leaky” vaccine makes the virus grow stronger, affecting mostly free thinkers. Us. They are potentially forcing us between a rock and a hard place.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

The vaccinated will be the dangerous ones, but they will still blame us.

This could be the catalyst for the “2nd wave” they taunted us about. Bill Gates couldn’t hide a sadistic smile while alluding to it.

The “leaky” vaccine makes the virus grow stronger, affecting mostly free thinkers.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

The vaccinated will be the dangerous ones, but they will still blame us.

This could be the catalyst for the “2nd wave” they taunted us about. Bill Gates couldn’t hide a sadistic smile while alluding to it.

The vaccine makes the virus grow stronger, affecting mostly free thinkers.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

The vaccinated will be the dangerous ones, but they will still blame us.

This could be the catalyst for the “2nd wave” they taunted us about. Bill Gates couldn’t hide a sadistic smile while alluding to it.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

The vaccinated will be the dangerous ones, but they will still blame us.

This could be the catalyst for the “2nd wave” they taunted us about.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

The vaccinated will be the dangerous ones, but they will still blame us.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

The vaccinated become a super-charger for the virus. Empowering it.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

I in no way subscribe to this theory, but it is something to consider. Is this vaccine “leaky” like the Marek’s disease one?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The article is trying to say that the vaccinated force the virus to evolve into something stronger, and they can still transmit this to us.

Meaning they may be fucked, but we might be better off staying the hell away from them for another reason, too.

If the virus comes into contact with a vaccinated person, it becomes 100x stronger and does not affect them, but is transmissable to us.

Meaning the lot who take it are under control, and those who do not are cornered. That was my interpretation.

3 years ago
1 score