The virus existing has substantial credible evidence. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.

For example:

• Here is the genome sequence for sars-cov-2.
• Here is evidence for thousands of tests on it.
• Here is a link to a database where sars-cov-2 variants from all over the world were submitted from independent tests that can be compared and studied.
• Here is an early analysis of the virus that suggests it was designed in a lab.
• Here is another analysis that suggests the reason it is so contagious is because its cell surface binding proteins were modeled after the same proteins used by the HIV virus. Something that is almost impossible to have happened naturally. This particular paper was forced to be retracted by the PTB, almost certainly to force people to not look deeper into this line of reasoning.

Here are labs that have specifically stated they have isolated it. This is a small sample of those available.

Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida

NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories

University of the Western Cape (UWC) and Stellenbosch University (SU) (South Africa)

McMaster’s Institute for Infectious Disease Research

Here are electron microscopy images of the virus.

India's first positive test

Cell culture viral isolate

Pictures at various stages of cell/viral body fusion

A close up

This again is a very small sampling of what's available.

There have been many tests on this virus and its effects. It is much more likely that it is real, than that thousands of scientists are all complicit in an elaborate scheme to make it all up.

I believe the scam was not in the existence of the virus, but in how virulent it was. That is a much easier scam to pull off. All you need to do is:

1. create a test that produces a lot of false positives (PCR test with too many cycles: Check)
2. incentivize hospitals to lie (Give each hospital $13,000 for each positive PCR test: Check)
3. incentivize hospitals to kill people (Give each hospital $39,000 for each person put on a ventilator which will kill them: Check).
4. Create hysteria in the population by introducing the virus into the vulnerable population and then setting up the treatment (ventilators) that will kill them (Aging population in Italy was the first credible report of massive amounts of death, along with "Wag the Dog" movies from China: Check)
5. Call all other illnesses Covid (Trivally easy with (1) and (2): Check)
6. Reinforce the fear with social policies. This is especially helpful if there is no proof that those policies work as it creates cognitive dissonance (Mask, social distancing and economic shutdown policies are all complete bullshit: Check)

Six steps and I just created a pandemic.

OR

I convince every biology researcher in the world to make up a fake virus AND do those six steps.

Which one do you think is simpler?

The virus existing has substantial credible evidence. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.

For example:

• Here is the genome sequence for sars-cov-2.
• Here is evidence for thousands of tests on it.
• Here is a link to a database where sars-cov-2 variants from all over the world were submitted from independent tests that can be compared and studied.
• Here is an early analysis of the virus that suggests it was designed in a lab.
• Here is another analysis that suggests the reason it is so contagious is because its cell surface binding proteins were modeled after the same proteins used by the HIV virus. Something that is almost impossible to have happened naturally. This particular paper was forced to be retracted by the PTB, almost certainly to force people to not look deeper into this line of reasoning.

Here are labs that have specifically stated they have isolated it. This is a small sample of those available.

Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida

NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories

University of the Western Cape (UWC) and Stellenbosch University (SU) (South Africa)

McMaster’s Institute for Infectious Disease Research

Here are electron microscopy images of the virus.

India's first positive test

Cell culture viral isolate

Pictures at various stages of cell/viral body fusion

A close up

This again is a very small sampling of what's available.

There have been many tests on this virus and its effects. It is much more likely that it is real, than that thousands of scientists are all complicit in an elaborate scheme to make it all up.

I believe the scam was not in the existence of the virus, but in how virulent it was. That is a much easier scam to pull off. All you need to do is:

1. create a test that produces a lot of false positives (PCR test with too many cycles: Check)
2. incentivize hospitals to lie (Give each hospital $13,000 for each positive PCR test: Check)
3. incentivize hospitals to kill people (Give each hospital $39,000 for each person put on a ventilator which will kill them: Check).
4. Create hysteria in the population by introducing the virus into the vulnerable population and then setting up the treatment (ventilators) that will kill them (Aging population in Italy was the first credible report of massive amounts of death, along with "Wag the Dog" movies from China: Check)
5. Call all other illnesses Covid (Trivally easy with (1) and (2): Check)
6. Reinforce the fear with social policies. This is especially helpful if there is no proof that those policies work as it creates cognitive dissonance (Mask, social distancing and economic shutdown policies are all complete bullshit: Check)

Six steps and I just created a pandemic.

OR

I convince every biology researcher in the world to make up a fake virus AND do those six steps.

Which one do you think is simpler?

The virus existing has substantial credible evidence. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.

For example:

• Here is the genome sequence for sars-cov-2.
• Here is evidence for thousands of tests on it.
• Here is a link to a database where sars-cov-2 variants from all over the world were submitted from independent tests that can be compared and studied.
• Here is an early analysis of the virus that suggests it was designed in a lab.
• Here is another analysis that suggests the reason it is so contagious is because its cell surface binding proteins were modeled after the same proteins used by the HIV virus. Something that is almost impossible to have happened naturally. This particular paper was forced to be retracted by the PTB, almost certainly to force people to not look deeper into this line of reasoning.

Here are labs that have specifically stated they have isolated it. This is a small sample of those available.

Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida

NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories

University of the Western Cape (UWC) and Stellenbosch University (SU) (South Africa)

McMaster’s Institute for Infectious Disease Research

Here are electron microscopy images of the virus.

India's first positive test

Cell culture viral isolate

Pictures at various stages of cell/viral body fusion

A close up

This again is a very small sampling of what's available.

There have been many tests on this virus and its effects. It is much more likely that it is real, than that thousands of scientists are all complicit in an elaborate scheme to make it all up.

I believe the scam was not in the existence of the virus, but in how virulent it was. That is a much easier scam to pull off. All you need to do is .

1. create a test that produces a lot of false positives (PCR test with too many cycles: Check)
2. incentivize hospitals to lie (Give each hospital $13,000 for each positive PCR test: Check)
3. incentivize hospitals to kill people (Give each hospital $39,000 for each person put on a ventilator which will kill them: Check).
4. Create hysteria in the population by introducing the virus into the vulnerable population and then setting up the treatment (ventilators) that will kill them (Aging population in Italy was the first credible report of massive amounts of death, along with "Wag the Dog" movies from China: Check)
5. Call all other illnesses Covid (Trivally easy with (1) and (2): Check)
6. Reinforce the fear with social policies. This is especially helpful if there is no proof that those policies work as it creates cognitive dissonance (Mask, social distancing and economic shutdown policies are all complete bullshit: Check)

Six steps and I just created a pandemic.

OR

I convince every biology researcher in the world to make up a fake virus AND do those six steps.

Which one do you think is simpler?

The virus existing has substantial credible evidence. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.

For example:

• Here is the genome sequence for sars-cov-2.
• Here is evidence for thousands of tests on it.
• Here is a link to a database where sars-cov-2 variants from all over the world were submitted from independent tests that can be compared and studied.
• Here is an early analysis of the virus that suggests it was designed in a lab.
• Here is another analysis that suggests the reason it is so contagious is because its cell surface binding proteins were modeled after the same proteins used by the HIV virus. Something that is almost impossible to have happened naturally. This particular paper was forced to be retracted by the PTB, almost certainly to force people to not look deeper into this line of reasoning.

Here are labs that have specifically stated they have isolated it. This is a small sample of those available.

Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida

NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories

University of the Western Cape (UWC) and Stellenbosch University (SU) (South Africa)

McMaster’s Institute for Infectious Disease Research

Here are electron microscopy images of the virus.

India's first positive test

Cell culture viral isolate

Pictures at various stages of cell/viral body fusion

A close up

This again is a very small sampling of what's available.

There have been many tests on this virus and its effects. It is much more likely that it is real, than that thousands of scientists are all complicit in an elaborate scheme to make it all up.

I believe the scam was not in the existence of the virus, but in how virulent it was. That is a much easier scam to pull off. All you need to do is .

1. create a test that produces a lot of false positives (PCR test with too many cycles: Check)
2. incentivize hospitals to lie (Give each hospital $13,000 for each positive PCR test: Check)
3. incentivize hospitals to kill people (Give each hospital $39,000 for each person put on a ventilator which will kill them: Check).
4. Create hysteria in the population by introducing the virus into the vulnerable population and then setting up the treatment (ventilators) that will kill them (Aging population in Italy was the first credible report of massive amounts of death, along with "Wag the Dog" movies from China: Check)
5. Call all other illnesses Covid (Trivally easy with (1) and (2): Check)
6. Reinforce the fear with social policies. This is especially helpful if there is no proof that those policies work as it creates cognitive dissonance (Mask, social distancing and economic shutdown policies are all complete bullshit: Check)

Six steps and I just created a pandemic.

OR

I convince every biology researcher in the world to make up a fake virus AND do those six steps.

Which one do you think is simpler?