+First, green is sarcastic. If the person who wrote, placed and owns the Georgia guidestones also owns the land, leave them alone. That's what the Zero Aggression Principle is. https://zeroaggressionproject.org/

(https://thetvtraveler.com/visiting-the-georgia-guidestones/

+Second, (1) to reduce the population to five hundred million is unnecessary, counter productive, and if not done with the consent of every person able to reason on earth, and anyone who is not able to reason's loved ones is a violation of the ZAP.

• (2) Guide Reproduction wisely for fitness and diversity- How are you going to reach this goal without a violation of the ZAP, pray tell? Are we going to check everyone for unhealthy genes and ban those with any 'defective genes' from reproducing- once again, this is ripe for ZAP violations.

• 3-7 , after dealing with the first two, three should come logically- What if everyone does not want to be united by one language? What about those who are concerned about 'thought crimes'? Maybe people don't want all of what they say to be known by anyone and everyone, even those with intent to harm them.

+Four, Five, Six and Seven seem very out of place here, but is it possible that the type of reason and justice involved would be only for those who agreed with the Guidestones? To ask the question is to answer it. All we have to do here is to look at how Congress writes laws that apply to everyone else, but not them, to see where this could go.

+Eight: Balance Personal rights with social duties: Who would determine that? Imperfect people, all of whom are neither qualified to rule or follow?

https://zeroaggressionproject.org/mental-lever/stanford-milgram-authority/

+Nine: Once again, who would determine what Truth, Beauty and Love are? These same people?

+Ten: Living in balance with nature- The same question applies here- Who would determine this?

First, green is sarcastic. If the person who wrote, placed and owns the Georgia guidestones also owns the land, leave them alone. That's what the Zero Aggression Principle is. https://zeroaggressionproject.org/

(https://thetvtraveler.com/visiting-the-georgia-guidestones/

Second, (1) to reduce the population to five hundred million is unnecessary, counter productive, and if not done with the consent of every person able to reason on earth, and anyone who is not able to reason's loved ones is a violation of the ZAP. (2) Guide Reproduction wisely for fitness and diversity- How are you going to reach this goal without a violation of the ZAP, pray tell? Are we going to check everyone for unhealthy genes and ban those with any 'defective genes' from reproducing- once again, this is ripe for ZAP violations. 3-7 , after dealing with the first two, three should come logically- What if everyone does not want to be united by one language? What about those who are concerned about 'thought crimes'? Maybe people don't want all of what they say to be known by anyone and everyone, even those with intent to harm them.

Four, Five, Six and Seven seem very out of place here, but is it possible that the type of reason and justice involved would be only for those who agreed with the Guidestones? To ask the question is to answer it. All we have to do here is to look at how Congress writes laws that apply to everyone else, but not them, to see where this could go.

Eight: Balance Personal rights with social duties: Who would determine that? Imperfect people, all of whom are neither qualified to rule or follow?

https://zeroaggressionproject.org/mental-lever/stanford-milgram-authority/

Nine: Once again, who would determine what Truth, Beauty and Love are? These same people?

Ten: Living in balance with nature- The same question applies here- Who would determine this?

First, green is sarcastic. If the person who wrote, placed and owns the Georgia guidestones also owns the land, leave them alone. That's what the Zero Aggression Principle is. https://zeroaggressionproject.org/

(https://thetvtraveler.com/visiting-the-georgia-guidestones/

Second, (1) to reduce the population to five hundred million is unnecessary, counter productive, and if not done with the consent of every person able to reason on earth, and anyone who is not able to reason's loved ones is a violation of the ZAP. (2) Guide Reproduction wisely for fitness and diversity- How are you going to reach this goal without a violation of the ZAP, pray tell? Are we going to check everyone for unhealthy genes and ban those with any 'defective genes' from reproducing- once again, this is ripe for ZAP violations. 3-7 , after dealing with the first two, three should come logically- What if everyone does not want to be united by one language? What about those who are concerned about 'thought crimes'? Maybe people don't want all of what they say to be known by anyone and everyone, even those with intent to harm them.

Five, Six and Seven seem very out of place here, but is it possible that the type of justice involved would be only for those who agreed with the Guidestones? To ask the question is to answer it. All we have to do here is to look at how Congress writes laws that apply to everyone else, but not them, to see where this could go.

Eight: Balance Personal rights with social duties: Who would determine that? Imperfect people, all of whom are neither qualified to rule or follow?

https://zeroaggressionproject.org/mental-lever/stanford-milgram-authority/

Nine: Once again, who would determine what Truth, Beauty and Love are? These same people?

Ten: Living in balance with nature- The same question applies here- Who would determine this?