Print the FDA sheet off and highlight the section I quoted. They are "legally" distinct. It also states the same thing on the actual FDA approval paperwork. They have tried to pull a fast one. In addition, there is no EO that mandates employers with more than 100 employees to mandate the jab. Look it up. They only talked about an EO, but they did not actually write one. Also, the EO requiring Federal workers to be jabbed is also bogus. The language states:
Each agency shall implement, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a program to require COVID-19 vaccination for all of its Federal employees, with exceptions only as required by law. Executive Order 14043 of September 9, 2021 Requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Federal Employees
Legally they cannot mandate an experimental medical procedure. It is against Federal informed consent laws. They have pulled the wool over everyone's eyes and they are getting away with it.
45 CFR § 46.116 - General requirements for informed consent.
The conditions under which informed consent is sought and the relationship between the subject and the person obtaining consent must be carefully considered to minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence (21 CFR 50.20). According to the Belmont Report, "Coercion occurs when an overt threat of harm is intentionally presented by one person to another in order to obtain compliance. Undue influence, by contrast, occurs through an offer of an excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance."
For example, when an employing party seeks to enroll employees in a clinical investigation sponsored or conducted by the employing party, the protocol should contain safeguards to ensure that participation is voluntary and that there is no undue influence by supervisors, peers, or others. Similarly, because of a potential conflict of interest and the nature of the physician-patient relationship, when the investigator is also the prospective subject's physician, the physician should be careful to ensure that the prospective subject understands that enrollment in the clinical investigation is voluntary and that a decision to forego enrollment will not adversely affect his/her medical care. The consent form should emphasize that an individual's participation is truly voluntary.
Print the FDA sheet off and highlight the section I quoted. They are "legally" distinct. It also states the same thing on the actual FDA approval paperwork. They have tried to pull a fast one. In addition, there is no EO that mandates employers with more than 100 employees to mandate the jab. Look it up. They only talked about an EO, but they did not actually write one. Also, the EO requiring Federal workers to be jabbed is also bogus. The language states:
Each agency shall implement, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a program to require COVID-19 vaccination for all of its Federal employees, with exceptions only as required by law. Executive Order 14043 of September 9, 2021 Requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Federal Employees
Legally they cannot mandate an experimental medical procedure. It is against Federal informed consent laws. They have pulled the wool over everyone's eyes and they are getting away with it.
45 CFR § 46.116 - General requirements for informed consent.
Print the FDA sheet off and highlight the section I quoted. They are "legally" distinct. It also states the same thing on the actual FDA approval paperwork. They have tried to pull a fast one. In addition, there is no EO that mandates employers with more than 100 employees to mandate the jab. Look it up. They only talked about an EO, but they did not actually write one. Also, the EO requiring Federal workers to be jabbed is also bogus. The language states:
Each agency shall implement, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a program to require COVID-19 vaccination for all of its Federal employees, with exceptions only as required by law. Executive Order 14043 of September 9, 2021 Requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Federal Employees
Legally they cannot mandate an experimental medical procedure. It is against Federal informed consent laws. They have pulled the wool over everyone's eyes and they are getting away with it.
45 CFR § 46.116 - General requirements for informed consent.
Print the FDA sheet off and highlight the section I quoted. They are "legally" distinct. It also states the same thing on the actual FDA approval paperwork. They have tried to pull a fast one. In addition, there is no EO that mandates employers with more than 100 employees to mandate the jab. Look it up. They only talked about an EO, but they did not actually write one. Also, the EO requiring Federal workers to be jabbed is also bogus. The language states:
Each agency shall implement, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a program to require COVID-19 vaccination for all of its Federal employees, with exceptions only as required by law. Executive Order 14043 of September 9, 2021 Requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Federal Employees
Legally they cannot mandate an experimental medical procedure. It is against Federal informed consent laws. They have pulled the wool over everyone's eyes and they are getting away with it.
Print the FDA sheet off and highlight the section I quoted. They are "legally" distinct. It also states the same thing on the actual FDA approval paperwork. They have tried to pull a fast one. In addition, there is no EO that mandates employers with more than 100 employees to mandate the jab. Look it up. They only talked about an EO, but they did not actually write one. Also, the EO requiring Federal workers to be jabbed is also bogus. The language states:
Each agency shall implement, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a program to require COVID-19 vaccination for all of its Federal employees, with exceptions only as required by law.
Legally they cannot mandate an experimental medical procedure. It is against Federal informed consent laws. They have pulled the wool over everyone's eyes and they are getting away with it.
Print the FDA sheet off and highlight the section I quoted. They are "legally" distinct. It also states the same thing on the actual FDA approval paperwork. They have tried to pull a fast one. In addition, there is no EO that mandates employers with more than 100 employees to mandate the jab. Look it up. They only talked about an EO, but they did not actually write one. Also, the EO requiring Federal workers to be jabbed is also bogus. The language states:
Each agency shall implement, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a program to require COVID-19 vaccination for all of its Federal employees, with exceptions only as required by law.
Legally they cannot mandate an experimental medical procedure. It is against Federal informed consent laws. They have pulled the wool over everyone's eyes and they are getting away with it.
Print the FDA sheet off and highlight the section I quoted. They are "legally" distinct. It also states the same thing on the actual FDA approval paperwork. They have tried to pull a fast one. In addition, there is no EO that mandates employers with more than 100 employees to mandate the jab. Look it up. They only talked about an EO, but they did not actually write one.