OLD AND NOT TRUE NOW
All of this is old and now false information, and the CDC sheepishly admitted there was neither an pure isolate or a valid PCR primer for testing SARS-2...so in the last week of December CDC announced they have a pure isolate for valid researchers to access. CDC even found and backdated a paper from Dec 2020 and gave it a summer 2020 submission time.
Dec. 29, 2020 the CDC said SARS-2 finally existed
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html
On December 29 2020 the CDC put up a page to stop the mocking COMPLETE WITH BACKDATED LIES!
Yes Lies!
But the announcement is technically, true at this point, the last week of Dec 2020, after being mocked for months.
Isolated, and honestly proven by allowing pure samples to select authorized researchers!
DECEMBER FUCKING 2020 Sars-2 finally announced isolated physically by CDC in writing , vs a computer RNA data file!
The PAPER The CDC cherry picked pretending to isolate it was not published until JUNE 2020: https://archive.is/AdLuk#selection-681.29-681.38
No authoritative scientific announcements of a physical isolate for majority of 2020!!!
That paper is also revisionist , and fabricated due to RELENTLESS MOCKING of NON-EXISTENCE of a pure isolated sample of SARS-2, just dirty slurries with other mystery coronavirus and other viral particles contaminating.
That paper also sheepishly admits to chopping up all virus CHOPPING INTO FRAGMENTS, then forcing fragments recombine in software, then scanning 6 fold and higher PCR amplified for needle in a haystack CONFIRMATION BIAS of preexisting DATABASE FILE they were looking for!
Read it yourself in section "Whole-Genome Sequencing" of that June 2020 paper with backdated timelines.
Digital end stitching of broken fragments to make a jigsaw puzzle used just 75-base pairs on each end (75-base protocol). And of course most all of these fragments in nature exist in other virus like the common cold, and HIV , etc. but mathematically, statistically, with enough overlapping it becomes factual if trying to put together a match to a required solution. All base pairs in database eventually matched the sequence they were trying to match that existed at the end of December 2019 in countless early science papers, many months prior.
Then that paper HANDWAVES over (glosses over) the most important part! "Electron Microscopy" NO PHOTOGRAPHS, NO 3D MODELS , NO NOTHING from that hilarious JUNE 2020 paper!!!!
It is NOT an isolate, it is a confirmation bias paper trying to merely digitally restitch SARS-2 database sequence from a sick persons sputum.
It was a very quiet little sneaky announcement by CDC after a year of mockery of no SARS-2 isolate viral samples available. It cites one faked June 2020 paper, that does not technically create an isolate at all, and then just mixes a slurry of DNA broken tiny sub fragments together digitally, matching to a KNOWN DATABASE FILE called "sars-2 strands".
There is a 1% chance the CDC is still lying , and that paper is no proof at all of anything.
There is a 1% chance (not impossible), that there is no isolate, because in 2021 all biology is digital now, and does not use physical pure viral samples, except during electroscopy photography to confirm 3d models of protein surface spikes. In fact, only 3D models are used for viral visualization in 2021, never real photos. Glorious pretty 3D models of the proteins that make the SARS-2 wuhan viral shell were published in JANUARY 2020 very very long ago. (based on prior SARS-1, but remodeled with new data).
99% Chance that finally, after a year of mocking , CDC does finally own an isolated sample of SARS-2, frozen away. Created only because the mocking was relentless for so many months.
The CDC in Dec 2020 cited a joke of a June 2020 paper, as proof, a very weak and late paper that neither found nor photographed SARS-2 isolate!
= = = =
SIDE TOPIC!:
In August 2021 or so, CDC announced every PCR test ever given was in error and invalid and a real PCR test primer for SARS-2 would not exist until end of sep 2021. The solution CDC required for researchers and pathologist for Sept 2021 to now is...
THREE TEST STAGES:
- 1 - test PCR for influenza A
- no? 2 - test PCR for influenza B
- no? 3 - test PCR for COVID B.1.1.7 and B.1.526 and delta strains [B.1.617.2 and 3 others AY.1, AY.2, and G/478K.V] As you can see there is no such thing as "Delta Strain" and is a news branding fabrication by W.H.O. that signified three unrelated variants.
Thats from CDC own web sites.
= = = =
TL/DR: The CDC finally announced a SARS-2 Isolate on Dec 29th 2020, of SARS-2 being real and iosolate
OLD AND NOT TRUE NOW
All of this is old and now false information, and the CDC sheepishly admitted there was neither an pure isolate or a valid PCR primer for testing SARS-2...so in the last week of December CDC announced they have a pure isolate for valid researchers to access. CDC even found and backdated a paper from Dec 2020 and gave it a summer 2020 submission time.
Dec. 29, 2020 the CDC said SARS-2 finally existed
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html
On December 29 2020 the CDC put up a page to stop the mocking COMPLETE WITH BACKDATED LIES!
Yes Lies!
But the announcement is technically, true at this point, the last week of Dec 2020, after being mocked for months.
Isolated, and honestly proven by allowing pure samples to select authorized researchers!
DECEMBER FUCKING 2020 Sars-2 finally announced isolated physically by CDC in writing , vs a computer RNA data file!
The PAPER The CDC cherry picked pretending to isolate it was not published until JUNE 2020: https://archive.is/AdLuk#selection-681.29-681.38
No authoritative scientific announcements of a physical isolate for majority of 2020!!!
That paper is also revisionist , and fabricated due to RELENTLESS MOCKING of NON-EXISTENCE of a pure isolated sample of SARS-2, just dirty slurries with other mystery coronavirus and other viral particles contaminating.
That paper also sheepishly admits to chopping up all virus CHOPPING INTO FRAGMENTS, then forcing fragments recombine in software, then scanning 6 fold and higher PCR amplified for needle in a haystack CONFIRMATION BIAS of preexisting DATABASE FILE they were looking for!
Read it yourself in section "Whole-Genome Sequencing" of that June 2020 paper with backdated timelines.
Digital end stitching of broken fragments to make a jigsaw puzzle used just 75-base pairs on each end (75-base protocol). And of course most all of these fragments in nature exist in other virus like the common cold, and HIV , etc. but mathematically, statistically, with enough overlapping it becomes factual if trying to put together a match to a required solution. All base pairs in database eventually matched the sequence they were trying to match that existed at the end of December 2019 in countless early science papers, many months prior.
Then that paper HANDWAVES over (glosses over) the most important part! "Electron Microscopy" NO PHOTOGRAPHS, NO 3D MODELS , NO NOTHING from that hilarious JUNE 2020 paper!!!!
It is NOT an isolate, it is a confirmation bias paper trying to merely digitally restitch SARS-2 database sequence from a sick persons sputum.
It was a very quiet little sneaky announcement by CDC after a year of mockery of no SARS-2 isolate viral samples available. It cites one faked June 2020 paper, that does not technically create an isolate at all, and then just mixes a slurry of DNA broken tiny sub fragments together digitally, matching to a KNOWN DATABASE FILE called "sars-2 strands".
There is a 1% chance the CDC is still lying , and that paper is no proof at all of anything.
There is a 1% chance (not impossible), that there is no isolate, because in 2021 all biology is digital now, and does not use physical pure viral samples, except during electroscopy photography to confirm 3d models of protein surface spikes. In fact, only 3D models are used for viral visualization in 2021, never real photos. Glorious pretty 3D models of the proteins that make the SARS-2 wuhan viral shell were published in JANUARY 2020 very very long ago. (based on prior SARS-1, but remodeled with new data).
99% Chance that finally, after a year of mocking , CDC does finally own an isolated sample of SARS-2, frozen away. Created only because the mocking was relentless for so many months.
The CDC in Dec 2020 cited a joke of a June 2020 paper, as proof, a very weak and late paper that neither found nor photographed SARS-2 isolate!
= = = =
SIDE TOPIC!:
In August 2021 or so, CDC announced every PCR test ever given was in error and invalid and a real PCR test primer for SARS-2 would not exist until end of sep 2021. The solution CDC required for researchers and pathologist for Sept 2021 to now is...
THREE TEST STAGES:
1 - test PCR for influenza A
no? 2 - test PCR for influenza B
no? 3 - test PCR for COVID B.1.1.7 and B.1.526 and delta strains [B.1.617.2 and 3 others AY.1, AY.2, and G/478K.V] As you can see there is no such thing as "Delta Strain" and is a news branding fabrication by W.H.O. that signified three unrelated variants.
Thats from CDC own web sites.
= = = = TL/DR: The CDC finally announced a SARS-2 Isolate on Dec 29th 2020, of SARS-2 being real and iosolate
OLD AND NOT TRUE NOW
All of this is old and now false information, and the CDC sheepishly admitted there was neither an pure isolate or a valid PCR primer for testing SARS-2...so in the last week of December CDC announced they have a pure isolate for valid researchers to access. CDC even found and backdated a paper from Dec 2020 and gave it a summer 2020 submission time.
Dec. 29, 2020 the CDC said SARS-2 finally existed
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html
On December 29 2020 the CDC put up a page to stop the mocking COMPLETE WITH BACKDATED LIES!
Yes Lies!
But the announcement is technically, true at this point, the last week of Dec 2020, after being mocked for months.
Isolated, and honestly proven by allowing pure samples to select authorized researchers!
DECEMBER FUCKING 2020 Sars-2 finally announced isolated physically by CDC in writing , vs a computer RNA data file!
The PAPER The CDC cherry picked pretending to isolate it was not published until JUNE 2020: https://archive.is/AdLuk#selection-681.29-681.38
No authoritative scientific announcements of a physical isolate for majority of 2020!!!
That paper is also revisionist , and fabricated due to RELENTLESS MOCKING of NON-EXISTENCE of a pure isolated sample of SARS-2, just dirty slurries with other mystery coronavirus and other viral particles contaminating.
That paper also sheepishly admits to chopping up all virus CHOPPING INTO FRAGMENTS, then forcing fragments recombine in software, then scanning 6 fold and higher PCR amplified for needle in a haystack CONFIRMATION BIAS of preexisting DATABASE FILE they were looking for!
Read it yourself in section "Whole-Genome Sequencing" of that June 2020 paper with backdated timelines.
Digital end stitching of broken fragments to make a jigsaw puzzle used just 75-base pairs on each end (75-base protocol). And of course most all of these fragments in nature exist in other virus like the common cold, and HIV , etc. but mathematically, statistically, with enough overlapping it becomes factual if trying to put together a match to a required solution. All base pairs in database eventually matched the sequence they were trying to match that existed at the end of December 2019 in countless early science papers, many months prior.
Then that paper HANDWAVES over (glosses over) the most important part! "Electron Microscopy" NO PHOTOGRAPHS, NO 3D MODELS , NO NOTHING from that hilarious JUNE 2020 paper!!!!
It is NOT an isolate, it is a confirmation bias paper trying to merely digitally restitch SARS-2 database sequence from a sick persons sputum.
It was a very quiet little sneaky announcement by CDC after a year of mockery of no SARS-2 isolate viral samples available. It cites one faked June 2020 paper, that does not technically create an isolate at all, and then just mixes a slurry of DNA broken tiny sub fragments together digitally, matching to a KNOWN DATABASE FILE called "sars-2 strands".
There is a 1% chance the CDC is still lying , and that paper is no proof at all of anything.
There is a 1% chance (not impossible), that there is no isolate, because in 2021 all biology is digital now, and does not use physical pure viral samples, except during electroscopy photography to confirm 3d models of protein surface spikes. In fact, only 3D models are used for viral visualization in 2021, never real photos. Glorious pretty 3D models of the proteins that make the SARS-2 wuhan viral shell were published in JANUARY 2020 very very long ago. (based on prior SARS-1, but remodeled with new data).
99% Chance that finally, after a year of mocking , CDC does finally own an isolated sample of SARS-2, frozen away. Created only because the mocking was relentless for so many months.
The CDC in Dec 2020 cited a joke of a June 2020 paper, as proof, a very weak and late paper that neither found nor photographed SARS-2 isolate!