Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

This is because the resources in Africa was already there. White Europeans moved to colder areas. Which food was sparse.

This FORCED whites to get innovative to survive. Which is why new innovations came.

I agree. This is also why Whites developed higher IQ levels, which are a measure of abstract thinking ability.

We humans have a higher ability for logical thinking that other animals, and those who had to be more innovative to survive also went beyond that. Those who had their needs met with nature all around them and reasonably "easy pickin's" did not have to evolve their intellect as much.

African languages are primative compared to European ones. Maybe that happened out of necessity.

However it happened, it can be problematic when a society grows large, and a sub-set of that society has such limited thinking skills. One must be able to use critical thinking to plan for tomorrow, to honor ethical behavior, and a host of other things that should be prevelant in any peaceful society.

But there is a sub-set within society that does not have these skills. They display this fact every day, particularly on the south side of Chicago.

The fatherlessness and other similar factors play a role, for sure. But other sub-sets of society that have similar problems do not enage in the same criminal behavior at the same rates.

We could also discuss non-black sub-sets of society on a larger scale. Look at the Muslim world. Most are arab, not black.

They have built societies that are chaotic, not peaceful. Why? Because they do not have intellectual thinkers like the Europeans have had in history.

There is no Aristotle in northern Africa or the Middle East. As a result, there is no critial thinking ability, and that leads to chaos. We are not seeing this on a worldwide scale, as a couple of generations have not learned how to use their innate critical thiking skills.

Anyway, this is a huge topic, and I don't have time to continue it for now.

I do appreciate your input, but I also understand why some people want to isolate from others who they see as more harmful to their lives than beneficial.

They have the right to do that, if they choose. That does not mean we are not all in this together. It's not about all of us holding hands and singing together. It is about all of us respecting the rights of others, and about calling out those who would interfere with our individual liberty.

That's what the globalists are all about -- destroying individual liberty.

And the ONLY way we will overcome that (together) is by insisting on CRITICAL THINKING. That is why [they] have tried to destroy critical thinking.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

This is because the resources in Africa was already there. White Europeans moved to colder areas. Which food was sparse.

This FORCED whites to get innovative to survive. Which is why new innovations came.

I agree. This is also why Whites developed higher IQ levels, which are a measure of abstract thinking ability.

We humans have a higher ability for logical thinking that other animals, and those who had to be more innovative to survive also went beyond that. Those who had their needs met with nature all around them and reasonably "easy pickin's" did not have to evolve their intellect as much.

African languages are primative compared to European ones. Maybe that happened out of necessity.

However it happened, it can be problematic when a society grows large, and a sub-set of that society has such limited thinking skills. One must be able to use critical thinking to plan for tomorrow, to honor ethical behavior, and a host of other things that should be prevelant in any peaceful society.

But there is a sub-set within society that does not have these skills. They display this fact every day, particularly on the south side of Chicago.

The fatherlessness and other similar factors play a role, for sure. But other sub-sets of society that have similar problems do not enage in the same criminal behavior at the same rates.

We could also discuss non-black sub-sets of society on a larger scale. Look at the Muslim world. Most are arab, not black.

They have built societies that are chaotic, not peaceful. Why? Because they do not have intellectual thinkers like the Europeans have had in history.

There is no Aristotle in northern Africa or the Middle East. As a result, there is no critial thinking ability, and that leads to chaos. We are not seeing this on a worldwide scale, as a couple of generations have not learned how to use their innate critical thiking skills.

Anyway, this is a huge topic, and I don't have time to continue it for now.

I do appreciate your input, but I also understand why some people want to isolate from others who they see as more harmful to their lives than beneficial.

They have the right to do that, if they choose. That does not mean we are not all in this together. It's not about all of us holding hands and singing together. It is about all of us respecting the rights of others, and about calling out those who would interfer with our individual liberty.

That's what the globalists are all about -- destroying individual liberty.

And the ONLY way we will overcome that (together) is by insisting on CRITICAL THINKING. That is why [they] have tried to destroy critical thinking.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

This is because the resources in Africa was already there. White Europeans moved to colder areas. Which food was sparse.

This FORCED whites to get innovative to survive. Which is why new innovations came.

I agree. This is also why Whites developed higher IQ levels, which are a measure of abstract thinking ability.

We humans have a higher ability for logical thinking that other animals, and those who had to be more innovative to survive also went beyond that. Those who had their needs met with nature all around them and reasonably "easy pickin's" did not have to evolve their intellect as much.

African languages are primative compared to European ones. Maybe that happened out of necessity.

However it happened, it can be problematic when a society grows large, and a sub-set of that society has such limited thinking skills. One must be able to use critical thinking to plan for tomorrow, to honor ethical behavior, and a host of other things that should be prevelant in any peaceful society.

But there is a sub-set within society that does not have these skills. They display this fact every day, particularly on the south side of Chicago.

The fatherlessness and other similar factors play a role, for sure. But other sub-sets of society that have similar problems do not enage in the same criminal behavior at the same rates.

We could also discuss non-black sub-sets of society on a larger scale. Look at the Muslim world. Most are arab, not black.

They have built societies that are chaotic, not peaceful. Why? Because they do not have intellectual thinkers like the Europeans have had in history.

There is no Aristotle in northern Africa or the Middle East. As a result, there is no critial thinking ability, and that leads to chaos. We are not seeing this on a worldwide scale, as a couple of generations have not learned how to use their innate critical thiking skills.

Anyway, this is a huge topic, and I don't have time to continue it for now.

I do appreciate your imput, but I also understand why some people want to isolate from others who they see as more harmful to their lives than beneficial.

They have the right to do that, if they choose. That does not mean we are not all in this together. It's not about all of us holding hands and singing together. It is about all of us respecting the rights of others, and about calling out those who would interfer with our individual liberty.

That's what the globalists are all about -- destroying individual liberty.

And the ONLY way we will overcome that (together) is by insisting on CRITICAL THINKING. That is why [they] have tried to destroy critical thinking.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

This is because the resources in Africa was already there. White Europeans moved to colder areas. Which food was sparse.

This FORCED whites to get innovative to survive. Which is why new innovations came.

I agree. This is also why Whites developed higher IQ levels, which are a measure of abstract thinking ability.

We humans have a higher ability for logical thinking that other animals, and those who had to be more innovative to survive also went beyond that. Those who had their needs met with nature all around them and reasonably "easy pickin's" did not have to evolve their intellect as much.

African languages are primative compared to European ones. Maybe that happened out of necessity.

However it happened, it can be problematic when a society grows large, and a sub-set of that society has such limited thinking skills. One must be able to use critical thinking to plan for tomorrow, to honor ethical behavior, and a host of other things that should be prevelant in any peaceful society.

But there is a sub-set within society that does not have these skills. They display this fact every day, particularly on the south side of Chicago.

The fatherlessness and other similar factors play a role, for sure. But other sub-sets of society that have similar problems do not enage in the same criminal behavior at the same rates.

We could also discuss non-black sub-sets of society on a larger scale. Look at the Muslim world. Most are arab, not black.

They have built societies that are chaotic, not peaceful. Why? Because they do not have intellectual thinkers like the Europeans have had in history.

There is no Aristotle in northern Africa or the Middle East. As a result, there is no critial thinking ability, and that leads to chaos (which is also what we see worldwide, now, as a couple of generations have not learned how to use their innate critical thiking skills).

Anyway, this is a huge topic, and I don't have time to continue it for now.

I do appreciate your imput, but I also understand why some people want to isolate from others who they see as more harmful to their lives than beneficial.

They have the right to do that, if they choose. That does not mean we are not all in this together. It's not about all of us holding hands and singing together. It is about all of us respecting the rights of others, and about calling out those who would interfer with our individual liberty.

That's what the globalists are all about -- destroying individual liberty.

2 years ago
1 score