I respect the commitment you have to the investment in supporting the matrix of what (I think) we all, at one time or another believe to be, the truthful dissemination of honest objective facts.
Unfortunately, this is not now, nor probably has ever been the case, it's all a game of illusions, lies, misrepresentation and obfuscation.
The hegelian dialect requires the foundational structure of tribalism with leadership of both parties to be strong and convincing enough to rally the tribes to assault the opposing positions regardless of truths.
The omission of facts in and of itself is a lie, and hardly qualify as "spontaneous exchange of information".
You say "the lawyers prevented", could you be so compelled to present a argument of "lies by omission" because someone else directed you to and still claim honesty and integrity?
I also remember when Tucker tried to discredit Sydney Powell.
I also remember when Tucker claimed not enough voter fraud, time to move on.
"Tucker Carlson calls out Trump's election lawyer for refusing to show evidence supporting the president's baseless voter-fraud claims"
"Tucker Carlson Says There's Not Enough Fraud to Change Election Results: 'We Should Be Honest'"
https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-election-fraud-may-not-alter-outcome-1546252
Now for the 40k foot view.
All of these Hegelian con-men/women are paid obscene amounts of money, their loyalty lies in the hand of whomever pays them.
Ruppard's ideologies were different than his children's (and spouses) who now call the shots at faux. That's the underlying cause of the major shift in the narrative.
If someone offered me millions of dollars each year to lie by; misrepresentation, obfuscations and or just plain deceitful proclamation...
I would like to think I would decline, but I've never been offered. Rationalization is a slippery slope and is limited only by the boundaries of your honor and integrity.
I respect your courage of conviction to downvote and express as to why. Upvote for you my new fren.
I respect the commitment you have to the investment in supporting the matrix of what (I think) we all, at one time or another believe to be, the truthful dissemination of honest objective facts.
Unfortunately, this is not now, nor probably has ever been the case, it's all a game of illusions, lies, misrepresentation and obfuscation.
The hegelian dialect requires the foundational structure of tribalism with leadership of both parties to be strong and convincing enough to rally the tribes and assault the opposing positions regardless of truths.
The omission of facts in and of itself is a lie, and hardly qualify as "spontaneous exchange of information".
You say "the lawyers prevented", could you be so compelled to present a argument of "lies by omission" because someone else directed you to and still claim honesty and integrity?
I also remember when Tucker tried to discredit Sydney Powell.
I also remember when Tucker claimed not enough voter fraud, time to move on.
"Tucker Carlson calls out Trump's election lawyer for refusing to show evidence supporting the president's baseless voter-fraud claims"
"Tucker Carlson Says There's Not Enough Fraud to Change Election Results: 'We Should Be Honest'"
https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-election-fraud-may-not-alter-outcome-1546252
Now for the 40k foot view.
All of these Hegelian con-men/women are paid obscene amounts of money, their loyalty lies in the hand of whomever pays them.
Ruppard's ideologies were different than his children's (and spouses) who now call the shots at faux. That's the underlying cause of the major shift in the narrative.
If someone offered me millions of dollars each year to lie by; misrepresentation, obfuscations and or just plain deceitful proclamation...
I would like to think I would decline, but I've never been offered. Rationalization is a slippery slope and is limited only by the boundaries of your honor and integrity.
I respect your courage of conviction to downvote and express as to why. Upvote for you my new fren.
I respect the commitment you have to the investment in supporting the matrix of what (I think) we all, at one time or another believe to be, the truthful dissemination of honest objective facts.
Unfortunately, this is not now, nor probably has ever been the case, it's all a game of illusions, lies, misrepresentation and obfuscation.
The hegelian dialect requires the foundational structure of tribalism with leadership of both parties to be strong and convincing enough to rally the tribes and assault the opposing positions regardless of truths.
The omission of facts in and of itself is a lie, and hardly qualify as "spontaneous exchange of information".
You say "the lawyers prevented", could you be so compelled to present a argument of "lies by omission" because someone else directed you to and still claim honestly and integrity?
I also remember when Tucker tried to discredit Sydney Powell.
I also remember when Tucker claimed not enough voter fraud, time to move on.
"Tucker Carlson calls out Trump's election lawyer for refusing to show evidence supporting the president's baseless voter-fraud claims"
"Tucker Carlson Says There's Not Enough Fraud to Change Election Results: 'We Should Be Honest'"
https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-election-fraud-may-not-alter-outcome-1546252
Now for the 40k foot view.
All of these Hegelian con-men/women are paid obscene amounts of money, their loyalty lies in the hand of whomever pays them.
Ruppard's ideologies were different than his children's (and spouses) who now call the shots at faux. That's the underlying cause of the major shift in the narrative.
If someone offered me millions of dollars each year to lie by; misrepresentation, obfuscations and or just plain deceitful proclamation...
I would like to think I would decline, but I've never been offered. Rationalization is a slippery slope and is limited only by the boundaries of your honor and integrity.
I respect your courage of conviction to downvote and express as to why. Upvote for you my new fren.