Personal opinion. We have some brilliant anons and interpreters. But I think that the larger number of anons do not really practice balanced due diligence, and don't keep their convictions in reserve, but invest too readily in this or that theory.

Case in point: who really knew that the Election would be stolen and we'd have sleepy Joe Chaos for 1.5 years+? No anons knew or forecasted that, as far as I know. Certainly not me. I was taken by massive surprise, like everyone else.

Yet, here we are in 2022 June, and so much of it makes sense.

The Law of War manual theories, specifically those raised by MajicEyesonly, are intriguing and certainly seem to have some relevance. But, its a theory and interpretation. Like Devolution, and like so many other things.

On the surface of things, in the Q drops, 11.3 seems to directly refer to Nov 3, that stolen election. It certainly is a massive marker.

But the point is, we can theorize as much as we want. But it's just as important to acknowledge and recognize when the theory you believe has limitations, and to acknowledge and recognize that with many, many things, one simply doesn't know.

One of my favorite Q commentators/reporters is Dave Hayes for this reason. he admits it when something is ambiguous, or there is not sufficient evidence or data, etc. And he distinguishes between the facts and his beliefs (convictions).

Some people cannot do that simply because they are overly investing in their chosen belief about Q. That's really anathema to the Q message, in my opinion. It's kind of the opposite of what Q wants us to do.

You don't need to understand everything to know that Q is legit. Being able to acknowledge and recognize doubts, unknowns etc is a sign of true confidence and true faith, not the opposite. But some folks find that too hard to do, it seems.

Personal opinion. We have some brilliant anons and interpreters. But I think that the larger number of anons do not really practice balanced due diligence, and don't keep their convictions in reserve, but invest too readily in this or that theory.

Case in point: who really knew that the Election would be stolen and we'd have sleepy Joe Chaos for 1.5 years+? No anons knew or forecasted that, as far as I know. Certainly not me. I was taken by massive surprise, like everyone else.

Yet, here we are in 2022 June, and so much of it makes sense.

The Law of War manual theories, specifically those raised by MajicEyesonly, are intriguing and certainly seem to have some relevance. But, its a theory and interpretation. Like Devolution, and like so many other things.

On the surface of things, in the Q drops, 11.3 seems to directly refer to Nov 3, that stolen election. It certainly is a massive marker.

But the point is, we can theorize as much as we want. But it's just as important to acknowledge and recognize when the theory you believe has limitations, and to acknowledge and recognize that with many, many things, one simply doesn't know.

One of my favorite Q commentators/reporters is Dave Hayes for this reason. he admits it when something is ambiguous, or there is not sufficient evidence or data, etc.

Some people cannot do that simply because they are overly investing in their chosen belief about Q. That's really anathema to the Q message, in my opinion. It's kind of the opposite of what Q wants us to do.

You don't need to understand everything to know that Q is legit. Being able to acknowledge and recognize doubts, unknowns etc is a sign of true confidence and true faith, not the opposite. But some folks find that too hard to do, it seems.

Personal opinion. We have some brilliant anons and interpreters. But I think that the larger number of anons do not really practice balanced due diligence, and don't keep their convictions in reserve, but invest too readily in this or that theory.

Case in point: who really know that the Election would be stolen and we'd have sleepy Joe Chaos for 1.5 years+? No anons knew or forecasted that, as far as I know. Certainly not me. I was taken by massive surprise, like everyone else.

Yet, here we are in 2022 June, and so much of it makes sense.

The Law of War manual theories, specifically those raised by MajicEyesonly, are intriguing and certainly seem to have some relevance. But, its a theory and interpretation. Like Devolution, and like so many other things.

On the surface of things, in the Q drops, 11.3 seems to directly refer to Nov 3, that stolen election. It certainly is a massive marker.

But the point is, we can theorize as much as we want. But it's just as important to acknowledge and recognize when the theory you believe has limitations, and to acknowledge and recognize that with many, many things, one simply doesn't know.

One of my favorite Q commentators/reporters is Dave Hayes for this reason. he admits it when something is ambiguous, or there is not sufficient evidence or data, etc.

Some people cannot do that simply because they are overly investing in their chosen belief about Q. That's really anathema to the Q message, in my opinion. It's kind of the opposite of what Q wants us to do.

You don't need to understand everything to know that Q is legit. Being able to acknowledge and recognize doubts, unknowns etc is a sign of true confidence and true faith, not the opposite. But some folks find that too hard to do, it seems.