It hardly "disproves" the Mossad connection. Even 'Q' makes the point that AJ is a Mossad asset. The judgement against AJ has much wider implications to any voice out there that disagrees with the government narrative or spreads "misinformation". Who gets to decide what 'misinformation' is, especially when the government gets caught lying to us over and over again? It gives a monopoly to the government and its corporate sponsors. AJ has possibly set the precedent, and destroyed independent journalism. Free Speech is no longer 'free', except for the government approved Fake media. His mission is perhaps completed.

It hardly "disproves" the Mossad connection. Even 'Q' makes the point that AJ is a Mossad asset. The judgement against AJ has much wider implications to any voice out there that disagrees with the government narrative or spreads "misinformation". Who gets to decide what 'misinformation' is, especially when the government gets caught lying to us over and over again. AJ has possibly set the precedent, and destroyed independent journalism. Free Speech is no longer 'free', except for the government approved Fake media. His mission is perhaps completed.