Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.

Two things.

First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.

Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.

Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many" (where really they mean the Rulers of the many) outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."

That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.

Two things.

First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.

Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.

Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many" (where really they mean the Rulers) outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."

That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.

Two things.

First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.

Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.

Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many" (where really they mean our Rulers) outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."

That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.

Two things.

First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.

Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.

Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many," outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."

That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."

2 years ago
1 score