It would be easy to prove, imo, that the government colluded with Twitter who was acting as an arm of the government, and the government cannot make any law abridging freedom of speech.
“If potential clients can show us clear evidence that private, non-governmental actors are acting in concert or conspiracy with government actors to restrict speech—a very high evidentiary bar, we might be able to bring a civil-rights-conspiracy claim. But that would be a rare exception to the rule above. The evidence would have to be strong.”
It would be easy to prove, imo, that the government colluded with Twitter who was acting as an arm of the government, and the government cannot make no law abridging freedom of speech.
“If potential clients can show us clear evidence that private, non-governmental actors are acting in concert or conspiracy with government actors to restrict speech—a very high evidentiary bar, we might be able to bring a civil-rights-conspiracy claim. But that would be a rare exception to the rule above. The evidence would have to be strong.”