On the one hand, I can relate to this. I’m frustrated too.

On the other hand, this is too “on the nose” - it’s so obviously a Q reference, and so obviously meant to discourage anons (but in a manipulative way) that I’ve got to consider her controlled oppo at this point.

Not that I didn’t already have my doubts, but this clinches it.

On the one hand, I can relate to this. I’m frustrated too. This whole speaker vote has me questioning who to trust all over again, and I don’t like any of my options.

On the other hand, this is too “on the nose” - it’s so obviously a Q reference, and so obviously meant to discourage anons (but in a manipulative way) that I’ve got to consider her controlled oppo at this point.

Not that I didn’t already have my doubts, but this clinches it.

On the one hand, I can relate to this. I’m frustrated too. This whole speaker vote has me questioning who to trust all over again, and I don’t like any of my options.

On the other hand, this is too “on the nose” - it’s so obviously a Q reference, and so obviously meant to discourage anons (but in a manipulative way) that I’ve got to consider her controlled oppo at this point.