He wanted to make sure the media does not leak his (government) plans to fight the Cabal.

Either you are basing this conclusion on other things JFK said somewhere other than this speech, or you are injecting your own desires into what he said, because I can find no way to derive this conclusion from the rhetoric of the speech itself. On the contrary, he is clearly talking about the Soviet Union as "the enemy." It isn't ambiguous. No one listening to this speech at the time is going to take it to mean anything else. The "secrets" he is referring to in the second half of the speech which the media were to keep quiet on is the supposed clandestine war that was occurring as part of the Cold War. He even calls examples out by name:

For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

He is specifically talking about news leaked into the press about American satellites which the USSR found out about through the press. This rhetoric (and information) helps promote the Cold War narrative, and encourages the press to keep silent, and for the American people to appreciate media silence with relation to C_A efforts. This appreciation we should have as to why "Freedom of the press" should be reduced was sold under the guise of "National Security" which is the selling point of all such fuckery.

He even says all these things explicity:

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match. Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security--and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

The entire Cold War narrative was all theatre, at least at the top level, so the second part of the speech wasn't calling out the Cabal at all, but was rather promoting keeping quiet on the US's own clandestine efforts (AKA the C_A), which were more against the American people than the USSR.

I suggest you read it again. I assert that none of what you are saying is in there is actually in there past the first few paragraphs. Like I said, it's as if it were two different speeches. If you think that what you are proposing is contained within the rhetoric (again, after the first few paragraphs), point it out. I assert the second 2/3rds or so is all about keeping the actions of the C_A quiet because they were (supposedly) the front line in the "Cold War" (which was a total contrivance).

He wanted to make sure the media does not leak his (government) plans to fight the Cabal.

Either you are basing this conclusion on other things JFK said somewhere other than this speech, or you are injecting your own desires into what he said, because I can find no way to derive this conclusion from the rhetoric of the speech itself. On the contrary, he is clearly talking about the Soviet Union as "the enemy." It isn't ambiguous. No one listening to this speech at the time is going to take it to mean anything else. The "secrets" he is referring to in the second half of the speech which the media were to keep quiet on is the supposed clandestine war that was occurring as part of the Cold War. He even calls examples out by name:

For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

He is specifically talking about news leaked into the press about American satellites which the USSR found out about through the press. This rhetoric (and information) helps promote the Cold War narrative, and encourages the press to keep silent, and for the American people to appreciate media silence with relation to C_A efforts to promote the false concept of "National Security," which is the selling point of all such fuckery.

He even says all these things explicity:

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match. Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security--and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

The entire Cold War narrative was all theatre, at least at the top level, so the second part of the speech wasn't calling out the Cabal at all, but was rather promoting keeping quiet on the US's own clandestine efforts (AKA the C_A), which were more against the American people than the USSR.

I suggest you read it again. I assert that none of what you are saying is in there is actually in there past the first few paragraphs. Like I said, it's as if it were two different speeches. If you think that what you are proposing is contained within the rhetoric (again, after the first few paragraphs), point it out. I assert the second 2/3rds or so is all about keeping the actions of the C_A quiet because they were (supposedly) the front line in the "Cold War" (which was a total contrivance).

He wanted to make sure the media does not leak his (government) plans to fight the Cabal.

Either you are basing this conclusion on other things JFK said somewhere other than this speech, or you are injecting your own desires into what he said, because I can find no way to derive this conclusion from the rhetoric of the speech itself. On the contrary, he is clearly talking about the Soviet Union as "the enemy." It isn't ambiguous. No one listening to this speech at the time is going to take it to mean anything else. The "secrets" he is referring to in the second half of the speech which the media were to keep quiet on is the supposed clandestine war that was occurring as part of the Cold War. He even calls examples out by name:

For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

He is specifically talking about news leaked into the press about American satellites which the USSR found out about through the press. This rhetoric (and information) helps promote the Cold War narrative, and encourages the press to keep silent, and for the American people to appreciate media silence with relation to C_A efforts to promote the false concept of "National Security," which is the selling point of all such fuckery.

The entire Cold War narrative was all theatre, at least at the top level, so the second part of the speech wasn't calling out the Cabal at all, but was rather promoting keeping quiet on the US's own clandestine efforts (AKA the C_A), which were more against the American people than the USSR.

I suggest you read it again. I assert that none of what you are saying is in there is actually in there past the first few paragraphs. Like I said, it's as if it were two different speeches. If you think that what you are proposing is contained within the rhetoric (again, after the first few paragraphs), point it out. I assert the second 2/3rds or so is all about keeping the actions of the C_A quiet because they were (supposedly) the front line in the "Cold War" (which was a total contrivance).

He wanted to make sure the media does not leak his (government) plans to fight the Cabal.

Either you are basing this conclusion on other things JFK said somewhere other than this speech, or you are injecting your own desires into what he said, because I can find no way to derive this conclusion from the rhetoric of the speech itself. On the contrary, he is clearly talking about the Soviet Union as "the enemy." It isn't ambiguous. No one listening to this speech at the time is going to take it to mean anything else. The "secrets" he is referring to in the second half of the speech which the media were to keep quiet on is the supposed clandestine war that was occurring as part of the Cold War. He even calls examples out by name:

For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

He is specifically talking about news leaked into the press about American satellites which the USSR found out about through the press. This rhetoric (and information) helps promote the Cold War narrative, and encourages the press to keep silent, and for the American people to appreciate media silence with relation to C_A efforts to promote the false concept of "National Security," which is the selling point of all such fuckery.

The entire Cold War narrative was all theatre, at least at the top level, so the second part of the speech wasn't calling out the Cabal at all, but was rather promoting keeping quiet on the US's own clandestine efforts (AKA the C_A), which were more against the American people than the USSR.

I suggest you read it again. None of what you are saying is in there is in there past the first few paragraphs. Like I said, it's as if it were two different speeches. If you think that what you are proposing is contained within the rhetoric (again, after the first few paragraphs), point it out. I assert the second 2/3rds or so is all about keeping the actions of the C_A quiet because they were (supposedly) the front line in the "Cold War" (which was a total contrivance).

He wanted to make sure the media does not leak his (government) plans to fight the Cabal.

Either you are basing this conclusion on other things JFK said somewhere other than this speech, or you are injecting your own desires into what he said, because I can find no way to derive this conclusion from the rhetoric of the speech itself. On the contrary, he is clearly talking about the Soviet Union as "the enemy." It isn't ambiguous. No one listening to this speech at the time is going to take it to mean anything else. The "secrets" he is referring to in the second half of the speech which the media were to keep quiet on is the supposed clandestine war that was occurring as part of the Cold War. He even calls examples out by name:

For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

He is specifically talking about news leaked into the press about American satellites which the USSR found out about through the press. This rhetoric (and information) helps promote the Cold War narrative, and encourages the press to keep silent, and for the American people to appreciate media silence with relation to C_A efforts to promote the false concept of "National Security," which is the selling point of all such fuckery.

The entire Cold War narrative was all theatre, at least at the top level, so it wasn't calling out the Cabal at all, but was rather promoting keeping quiet on the US's own clandestine efforts (AKA the C_A), which were more against the American people than the USSR.

I suggest you read it again. None of what you are saying is in there is in there past the first few paragraphs. Like I said, it's as if it were two different speeches. If you think that what you are proposing is contained within the rhetoric (again, after the first few paragraphs), point it out. I assert the second 2/3rds or so is all about keeping the actions of the C_A quiet because they were (supposedly) the front line in the "Cold War" (which was a total contrivance).

He wanted to make sure the media does not leak his (government) plans to fight the Cabal.

Either you are basing this conclusion on other things JFK said somewhere other than this speech, or you are injecting your own desires into what he said, because I can find no way to derive this conclusion from the rhetoric of the speech itself. On the contrary, he is clearly talking about the Soviet Union as "the enemy." It isn't ambiguous. No one listening to this speech at the time is going to take it to mean anything else. The "secrets" he is referring to in the second half of the speech which the media were to keep quiet on is the supposed clandestine war that was occurring as part of the Cold War. He even calls examples out by name:

For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

He is specifically talking about news leaked into the press about American satellites which the USSR found out about through the press. This rhetoric (and information) helps promote the Cold War narrative, and encourages the press to keep silent, and for the American people to appreciate media silence with relation to C_A efforts to promote the false concept of "National Security," which is the selling point of all such fuckery.

The entire Cold War narrative was all theatre, at least at the top level, so it wasn't calling out the Cabal at all, but was rather promoting keeping quiet on the US's own clandestine efforts (AKA the C_A), which were more against the American people than the USSR.

I suggest you read it again. None of what you are saying is in there is in there past the first few paragraphs. Like I said, it's as if it were two different speeches. If you think that what you are proposing is contained within the rhetoric (again, after the first few paragraphs), point it out. I assert the second 2/3rds or so is all about the keeping the actions of the C_A quiet because they were (supposedly) the front line in the "Cold War" (which was a total contrivance).