As long as you are discounting any aspect of the speech, you are not making a fully educated guess.

I am not discounting anything. I am taking what I am reading and saying it was two different speeches. One I think to tell a secret, most likely for future generations, and one to cater to the Cabal, i.e. the original speech. That is my assessment. No where in that assessment am I discounting anything at all. I am however recognizing that the bulk of the speech, and more specifically the conclusions of the speech are exactly as I stated. You are suggesting there was a hidden message. So am I. But I recognize that within the context of what would be seen by pretty much every person who heard him give it, they would not have come to the conclusion about that speech that you did, but rather would have come to the conclusion that I did, i.e. that he was speaking about the USSR. Ignoring that is, I suggest, you discounting the context of the speech, which always leads to false conclusions and analyses.

As for the rest, I think you are missing so much evidence. I am going to give some statements without any evidence to support it. I've written a couple thousand pages on this in my report, but it is somewhat jumbled, and finding all the evidence to support it would take a lot of time. It will be coming out eventually, but for now I hope you listen, though I do not expect you (nor do I want you to) believe me.

Cabal being one big single entity with a singular goal.

There is absolutely a singular goal. It is as I have described. I suggest you read the protocols of the elders of Zion and look into the efforts of the zionists to create Israel, starting in the early 1800s (yes, it goes back at least that far). It will elucidate the "singular" goal a great deal. Of interest, the protocols were "debunked" by Allen Dulles. That's important for what I'm about to say. What he had to say about it is also important, but outside of the scope of what I'm saying right now.

I also agree there seems to be sub factions and sub goals. I think there are faction wars. The singular goal however is clear, and every effort always works towards it. Your idea of "humanist" and "anti-humanist" is not The Cabal. The Cabal is a group of people who call themselves Jews (and their underlings who call themselves whatever they want). Are there people who are among the elite who are "humanists?" Perhaps. I'd even go so far as to say "likely." However, they are not the Cabal. This may be a point of semantics, but it is an important distinction. They are not "the factions." If there are people who care about people within the larger group of The Cabal, they are not a clear faction. I do not think such a group could possibly survive. As far as I can tell, there is no "Faction war" that goes against the greater efforts of the Cabal as laid out in the Protocols (not counting perhaps the efforts of JFK and the present day). The Q effort is not a clear faction, but is perhaps a group within the Cabal that acts in hiding (or at least they were in hiding). I.e. they are a clandestine group, acting within a clandestine group, that acts within a secret society (if that is indeed what they are, and not controlled opposition).

In its origins as OSS, it was purely an entity to enforce banker interests in the east, to ensure opium trade happened properly and the gold that Britain lost in deficit trading was retrieved back from China.

The OSS in its origin was designed to help control the war. They worked with the Nazis the entire time. Allen Dulles, one of the biggest people within both the OSS and the CIA was meeting with Hitler at the beginning of his "rule" (he was never actually in charge of shit) and was there for the "surrender" of the Nazis. Then he took the Nazis and put them in various places. He created the CIA with the Nazis, and sent some to the KGB, and sent some to DARPA, and NASA, and the Soviet equivalent, and various other countries (including MI6, MOSSAD and Saudi Arabia). The Nazis never lost the war, on the contrary, they took over the world. Of course they didn't really take over the world, because the world was controlled by Rockefeller, Rothschild, etc. both before and after, but they of course were the Nazis, and all their agents who called themselves Nazis became all the other organizations mentioned.

Thinking that they were "purely an entity to enforce banker interests" has nothing to do with reality. They were always a propaganda agency. The world is controlled through propaganda. They were Goebbels agency, working in every country, all over the world. "Banking interests" are meaningless compared to the real scope of their control. Or rather, I agree completely, I just don't think you appreciate the real scope of "Banking interests."

After Cuban refugees started coming in, they started infiltrating CIA and started really pushing towards communism

This also has nothing to do with reality.

I'm just going to call "The Cabal", or more specifically, Rockefeller, Rothschild, and other acting agents of the Cabal who control most of the system (at least on the surface), "The Trust" for convenience.

The Trust created WWI. They created the USSR. They created WWII. They created the Nazis. They owned the entirety of the American government since at least the Civil War and they created the American response to all of those things. They created the CIA purely as an extension of the Nazis, doing all the same things the Nazis did. They created communism in the late 1700s and have been pushing it as a world wide control system ever since using all of these "separate agencies" as Controlled Opposition.

What I mean by "communism" is a separation of what we think of as "ownership" and "control." In communism "the state" (ostensibly We The People) own everything, but the control rests in the Centralized Authority. That is the system they are creating, and in truth, the entire world has been communist for almost 100 years now, we just don't realize it, because we live with the illusion that we own things. We don't. I mean, we do, or rather there are laws that say we do, but there are also laws that say we don't. They are in conflict, but only the laws that say we don't have any current power.

The CIA (and the Nazi's before them) was, from the getgo designed specifically to create a communist world. They were controlled opposition for the real agenda. Allen Dulles, who was a Rockefeller agent for 30+ years before he helped found the CIA with the Nazis was also the person in charge of starting the Cold War. This was not about "mafia." Their actions as mafia (they are also literally the mafia) was just the way of doing business, that was not their goal. Their goal is as I stated. All evidence to support that statement will be forthcoming, though I have given enough clues that you can almost certainly find corroborating evidence yourself if you look.

You are, like everyone else, not appreciating how much controlled opposition there is. That is why I am writing my report. People need to see the evidence. People need to understand the real scope of The Matrix, and why we believe what we believe.

Communism is but only one weapon in the anti-humanist arsenal, fiat based capitalism being the other. Its not the be all / end all goal for these people, the way many people think.

I agree with this completely. Communism and Capitalism (as we understand the terms) are two sides of the same coin. They both commit the same fraud when applied to a Free Market, i.e. neither one allows for a Free Market, they both create a Centralized Authority and ensure a Free Market can't happen. They both set up the same structure of rule, which is always a fraud of jurisdiction.

As long as you are discounting any aspect of the speech, you are not making a fully educated guess.

I am not discounting anything. I am taking what I am reading and saying it was two different speeches. One I think to tell a secret, most likely for future generations, and one to cater to the Cabal, i.e. the original speech. That is my assessment. No where in that assessment am I discounting anything at all. I am however recognizing that the bulk of the speech, and more specifically the conclusions of the speech are exactly as I stated. You are suggesting there was a hidden message. So am I. But I recognize that within the context of what would be seen by pretty much every person who heard him give it, they would not have come to the conclusion about that speech that you did, but rather would have come to the conclusion that I did, i.e. that he was speaking about the USSR. Ignoring that is, I suggest, you discounting the context of the speech, which always leads to false conclusions and analyses.

As for the rest, I think you are missing so much evidence. I am going to give some statements without any evidence to support it. I've written a couple thousand pages on this in my report, but it is somewhat jumbled, and finding all the evidence to support it would take a lot of time. It will be coming out eventually, but for now I hope you listen, though I do not expect you (nor do I want you to) believe me.

Cabal being one big single entity with a singular goal.

There is absolutely a singular goal. It is as I have described. I suggest you read the protocols of the elders of Zion and look into the efforts of the zionists to create Israel, starting in the early 1800s (yes, it goes back at least that far). It will elucidate the "singular" goal a great deal. Of interest, the protocols were "debunked" by Allen Dulles. That's important for what I'm about to say. What he had to say about it is also important, but outside of the scope of what I'm saying right now.

I also agree there seems to be sub factions and sub goals. I think there are faction wars. The singular goal however is clear, and every effort always works towards it. Your idea of "humanist" and "anti-humanist" is not The Cabal. The Cabal is a group of people who call themselves Jews (and their underlings who call themselves whatever they want). Are there people who are among the elite who are "humanists?" Perhaps. I'd even go so far as to say "likely." However, they are not the Cabal. This may be a point of semantics, but it is an important distinction. They are not "the factions." If there are people who care about people within the larger group of The Cabal, they are not a clear faction. I do not think such a group could possibly survive. As far as I can tell, there is no "Faction war" that goes against the greater efforts of the Cabal as laid out in the Protocols (not counting perhaps the efforts of JFK and the present day). The Q effort is not a clear faction, but is perhaps a group within the Cabal that acts in hiding (or at least they were in hiding). I.e. they are a clandestine group, acting within a clandestine group, that acts within a secret society (if that is indeed what they are, and not controlled opposition).

In its origins as OSS, it was purely an entity to enforce banker interests in the east, to ensure opium trade happened properly and the gold that Britain lost in deficit trading was retrieved back from China.

The OSS in its origin was designed to help control the war. They worked with the Nazis the entire time. Allen Dulles, one of the biggest people within both the OSS and the CIA was meeting with Hitler at the beginning of his "rule" (he was never actually in charge of shit) and was there for the "surrender" of the Nazis. Then he took the Nazis and put them in various places. He created the CIA with the Nazis, and sent some to the KGB, and sent some to DARPA, and NASA, and the Soviet equivalent, and various other countries (including MI6, MOSSAD and Saudi Arabia). The Nazis never lost the war, on the contrary, they took over the world. Of course they didn't really take over the world, because the world was controlled by Rockefeller, Rothschild, etc. both before and after, but they of course were the Nazis, and all their agents who called themselves Nazis became all the other organizations mentioned.

Thinking that they were "purely an entity to enforce banker interests" has nothing to do with reality. They were always a propaganda agency. The world is controlled through propaganda. They were Goebbels agency, working in every country, all over the world. "Banking interests" are meaningless compared to the real scope of their control. Or rather, I agree completely, I just don't think you appreciate the real scope of "Banking interests."

After Cuban refugees started coming in, they started infiltrating CIA and started really pushing towards communism

This also has nothing to do with reality.

I'm just going to call "The Cabal", or more specifically, Rockefeller, Rothschild, and other acting agents of the Cabal who control most of the system (at least on the surface), "The Trust" for convenience.

The Trust created WWI. They created the USSR. They created WWII. They created the Nazis. They owned the entirety of the American government since at least the Civil War and they created the American response to all of those things. They created the CIA purely as an extension of the Nazis, doing all the same things the Nazis did. They created communism in the late 1700s and have been pushing it as a world wide control system ever since using all of these "separate agencies" as Controlled Opposition.

The CIA (and the Nazi's before them) was, from the getgo designed specifically to create a communist world. They were controlled opposition for the real agenda. Allen Dulles, who was a Rockefeller agent for 30+ years before he helped found the CIA with the Nazis was also the person in charge of starting the Cold War. This was not about "mafia." Their actions as mafia (they are also literally the mafia) was just the way of doing business, that was not their goal. Their goal is as I stated. All evidence to support that statement will be forthcoming, though I have given enough clues that you can almost certainly find corroborating evidence yourself if you look.

You are, like everyone else, not appreciating how much controlled opposition there is. That is why I am writing my report. People need to see the evidence. People need to understand the real scope of The Matrix, and why we believe what we believe.

Communism is but only one weapon in the anti-humanist arsenal, fiat based capitalism being the other. Its not the be all / end all goal for these people, the way many people think.

I agree with this completely. Communism and Capitalism (as we understand the terms) are two sides of the same coin. They both commit the same fraud when applied to a Free Market, i.e. neither one allows for a Free Market, they both create a Centralized Authority and ensure a Free Market can't happen. They both set up the same structure of rule, which is always a fraud of jurisdiction.

As long as you are discounting any aspect of the speech, you are not making a fully educated guess.

I am not discounting anything. I am taking what I am reading and saying it was two different speeches. One I think to tell a secret, most likely for future generations, and one to cater to the Cabal, i.e. the original speech. That is my assessment. No where in that assessment am I discounting anything at all. I am however recognizing that the bulk of the speech, and more specifically the conclusions of the speech are exactly as I stated. You are suggesting there was a hidden message. So am I. But I recognize that within the context of what would be seen by pretty much every person who heard him give it, they would not have come to the conclusion about that speech that you did, but rather would have come to the conclusion that I did, i.e. that he was speaking about the USSR. Ignoring that is, I suggest, you discounting the context of the speech, which always leads to false conclusions and analyses.

As for the rest, I think you are missing so much evidence. I am going to give some statements without any evidence to support it. I've written a couple thousand pages on this in my report, but it is somewhat jumbled, and finding all the evidence to support it would take a lot of time. It will be coming out eventually, but for now I hope you listen, though I do not expect you (nor do I want you to) believe me.

Cabal being one big single entity with a singular goal.

There is absolutely a singular goal. It is as I have described. I suggest you read the protocols of the elders of Zion and look into the efforts of the zionists to create Israel, starting in the early 1800s (yes, it goes back at least that far). It will elucidate the "singular" goal a great deal. Of interest, the protocols were "debunked" by Allen Dulles. That's important for what I'm about to say. What he had to say about it is also important, but outside of the scope of what I'm saying right now.

I also agree there seems to be sub factions and sub goals. I think there are faction wars. The singular goal however is clear, and every effort always works towards it. Your idea of "humanist" and "anti-humanist" is not The Cabal. The Cabal is a group of people who call themselves Jews (and their underlings who call themselves whatever they want). Are there people who are among the elite who are "humanists?" Perhaps. I'd even go so far as to say "likely." However, they are not the Cabal. This may be a point of semantics, but it is an important distinction. They are not "the factions." If there are people who care about people within the larger group of The Cabal, they are not a clear faction. I do not think such a group could possibly survive. As far as I can tell, there is no "Faction war" that goes against the greater efforts of the Cabal as laid out in the Protocols (not counting perhaps the efforts of JFK and the present day). The Q effort is not a clear faction, but is perhaps a group within the Cabal that acts in hiding (or at least they were in hiding). I.e. they are a clandestine group, acting within a clandestine group, that acts within a secret society (if that is indeed what they are, and not controlled opposition).

In its origins as OSS, it was purely an entity to enforce banker interests in the east, to ensure opium trade happened properly and the gold that Britain lost in deficit trading was retrieved back from China.

The OSS in its origin was designed to help control the war. They worked with the Nazis the entire time. Allen Dulles, one of the biggest people within both the OSS and the CIA was meeting with Hitler at the beginning of his "rule" (he was never actually in charge of shit) and was there for the "surrender" of the Nazis. Then he took the Nazis and put them in various places. He created the CIA with the Nazis, and sent some to the KGB, and sent some to DARPA, and NASA, and the Soviet equivalent, and various other countries (including MI6, MOSSAD and Saudi Arabia). The Nazis never lost the war, on the contrary, they took over the world. Of course they didn't really take over the world, because the world was controlled by Rockefeller, Rothschild, etc. both before and after, but they of course were the Nazis, and all their agents who called themselves Nazis became all the other organizations mentioned.

Thinking that they were "purely an entity to enforce banker interests" has nothing to do with reality. They were always a propaganda agency. The world is controlled through propaganda. They were Goebbels agency, working in every country, all over the world. "Banking interests" are meaningless compared to the real scope of their control. Or rather, I agree completely, I just don't think you appreciate the real scope of "Banking interests."

After Cuban refugees started coming in, they started infiltrating CIA and started really pushing towards communism

This also has nothing to do with reality.

I'm just going to call "The Cabal", or more specifically, Rockefeller, Rothschild, and other acting agents of the Cabal who control most of the system (at least on the surface), "The Trust" for convenience.

The Trust created WWI. They created the USSR. They created WWII. They created the Nazis. They owned the entirety of the American government since at least the Civil War and they created the American response to all of those things. They created the CIA purely as an extension of the Nazis, doing all the same things the Nazis did. They created communism in the late 1700s and have been pushing it as a world wide control system ever since.

The CIA (and the Nazi's before them) was, from the getgo designed specifically to create a communist world. They were controlled opposition for the real agenda. Allen Dulles, who was a Rockefeller agent for 30+ years before he helped found the CIA with the Nazis was also the person in charge of starting the Cold War. This was not about "mafia." Their actions as mafia (they are also literally the mafia) was just the way of doing business, that was not their goal. Their goal is as I stated. All evidence to support that statement will be forthcoming, though I have given enough clues that you can almost certainly find corroborating evidence yourself if you look.

You are, like everyone else, not appreciating how much controlled opposition there is. That is why I am writing my report. People need to see the evidence. People need to understand the real scope of The Matrix, and why we believe what we believe.

Communism is but only one weapon in the anti-humanist arsenal, fiat based capitalism being the other. Its not the be all / end all goal for these people, the way many people think.

I agree with this completely. Communism and Capitalism (as we understand the terms) are two sides of the same coin. They both commit the same fraud when applied to a Free Market, i.e. neither one allows for a Free Market, they both create a Centralized Authority and ensure a Free Market can't happen. They both set up the same structure of rule, which is always a fraud of jurisdiction.