Liberal normie here, I guess I'll offer my own prediction. Not a good one:

Trump will bring out his evidence and maybe hastily run through the major points we've seen repeated in the last few years -- stuff from 2000 Mules, red/blue shifts, water leak.

Trump prefers to manipulate the court of public opinion and he wants to overload everyone with information, but he knows specifics are boring ("A Large, Complex, Detailed but Irrefutable REPORT...").

Unfortunately for him, he doesn't have a lot of arrows in his quiver. Whatever legal challenges he mentions are moot (because they all died in court); 2000 Mules has been picked apart like a rotisserie chicken (don't trust D'Souza as far as you can throw him). The bulletproof voter fraud evidence will be stuff that the twitter libs can disprove in an hour: inconsistencies/anomalies blown up by voter fraud detectives and arranged into an impossible-to-fully-understand web.

The press conference will come and go, and the indictments will stand. I hate to say it, but anons will be disappointed, and still waiting for things to kick into high gear.

This dovetails into my larger philosophy about Q -- how it was a simple online troll that unhappy anons baked into a patriotic mythos, which Trump Co. can wink at for a surge in voter support -- but that kind of talk gets a fellow marked for death around here.

Liberal normie here, I guess I'll offer my own prediction. Not a good one:

Trump will bring out his evidence and maybe hastily run through the major points we've seen repeated in the last few years -- stuff from 2000 Mules, red/blue shifts, water leak.

Trump prefers to manipulate the court of public opinion and he wants to overload everyone with information, but he knows specifics are boring ("A Large, Complex, Detailed but Irrefutable REPORT...").

Unfortunately for him, he doesn't have a lot of arrows in his quiver. Whatever legal challenges he mentions are moot (because they all died in court); 2000 Mules has been picked apart like a rotisserie chicken (don't trust D'Souza as far as you can throw him); the inconsistencies/anomalies are tiny (but blown up by the voter fraud detectives).

The press conference will come and go, and the indictments will stand. I hate to say it, but anons will be disappointed, and still waiting for things to kick into high gear.

This dovetails into my larger philosophy about Q -- how it was a simple online troll that unhappy anons baked into a patriotic mythos, which Trump Co. can wink at for a surge in voter support -- but that kind of talk gets a fellow marked for death around here.