Jesus’ very name bound him to Yahweh, Jesus never renounced Yahweh, he was identifiable through the words of the prophets, who also all bound their names to Yahweh, and he and the apostles both proclaimed that he was the Word of Yahweh made flesh - the perfect walking out of the Old Testament Covenant with Yahweh. Feel free to provide scriptural evidence to the contrary.
You appear to be advocating Kabbalistic Gnosticism, which I believe was acquired as a mode of thought during the Babylonian captivity, and would also explain the many vague claims with minimal evidence provided, which in my experience seems to be a hallmark of Gnosticism for whatever reason. If I am incorrect, you have my apologies, but for any Christian reading this, the gnostics and the adherents of The Way often strongly disagreed ideologically in the early days following Messiah’s coming. I recommend doing research before accepting these claims - and before accepting my claims too, for that matter.
“ ‘The Elohim who the Bible repeatedly and consistently names as Adonai of all creation’ is not actually the creator of all, and the Bible lies.” is a pretty big claim that requires better evidence than a contested 15th century mystical book from Spain. I also do not see the reasoning by which you can reject YHWH, yet seem to accept the man who claimed His Name and his teachings.
However, you do seem to get things correct when you state that division within the body is not of Christ, per the very name “de-NOM-ination”, or “Removal from The Name”. Proverbs 14:12 - There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. You are also correct that there are spiritual and other truths that are ignored by modern “religion”, whatever that distinction is in full (the word may not mean the same to me as to you). The church is most definitely not walking things out correctly, or we would not be here, but having heard many of gnosticism’s teachings, we do indeed disagree that it is the answer.
Ideological and factual disagreements aside, whatever the proper path is, may your feet tread upon it. Peace to you.
Jesus’ very name bound him to Yahweh, Jesus never renounced Yahweh, he was identifiable through the words of the prophets, who also all bound their names to Yahweh, and he and the apostles both proclaimed that he was the Word of Yahweh made flesh - the perfect walking out of the Old Testament Covenant with Yahweh. Feel free to provide scriptural evidence to the contrary.
You appear to be advocating Kabbalistic Gnosticism, which would also explain the many vague claims with minimal evidence provided, which in my experience seems to be a hallmark of Gnosticism for whatever reason. If I am incorrect, you have my apologies, but for any Christian reading this, the gnostics and the adherents of The Way often strongly disagreed ideologically in the early days following Messiah’s coming. I recommend doing research before accepting these claims - and before accepting my claims too, for that matter.
“ ‘The Elohim who the Bible repeatedly and consistently names as Adonai of all creation’ is not actually the creator of all, and the Bible lies.” is a pretty big claim that requires better evidence than a contested 15th century mystical book from Spain. I also do not see the reasoning by which you can reject YHWH, yet seem to accept the man who claimed His Name and his teachings.
However, you do seem to get things correct when you state that division within the body is not of Christ, per the very name “de-NOM-ination”, or “Removal from The Name”. Proverbs 14:12 - There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. You are also correct that there are spiritual and other truths that are ignored by modern “religion”, whatever that distinction is in full (the word may not mean the same to me as to you). The church is most definitely not walking things out correctly, or we would not be here, but having heard many of gnosticism’s teachings, we do indeed disagree that it is the answer.
Ideological and factual disagreements aside, whatever the proper path is, may your feet tread upon it. Peace to you.
Jesus’ very name bound him to Yahweh, Jesus never renounced Yahweh, and he and the apostles both proclaimed that he was the Word made flesh - the perfect walking out of the Old Testament Covenant with Yahweh. Feel free to provide scriptural evidence to the contrary.
You appear to be advocating Kabbalistic Gnosticism, which would also explain the many vague claims with minimal evidence provided, which in my experience seems to be a hallmark of Gnosticism for whatever reason. If I am incorrect, you have my apologies, but for any Christian reading this, the gnostics and the adherents of The Way often strongly disagreed ideologically in the early days following Messiah’s coming. I recommend doing research before accepting these claims - and before accepting my claims too, for that matter.
“ ‘The Elohim who the Bible repeatedly and consistently names as Adonai of all creation’ is not actually the creator of all, and the Bible lies.” is a pretty big claim that requires better evidence than a contested 15th century mystical book from Spain. I also do not see the reasoning by which you can reject YHWH, yet seem to accept the man who claimed His Name and his teachings.
However, you do seem to get things correct when you state that division within the body is not of Christ, per the very name “de-NOM-ination”, or “Removal from The Name”. Proverbs 14:12 - There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. You are also correct that there are spiritual and other truths that are ignored by modern “religion”, whatever that distinction is in full (the word may not mean the same to me as to you). The church is most definitely not walking things out correctly, or we would not be here, but having heard many of gnosticism’s teachings, we do indeed disagree that it is the answer.
Ideological and factual disagreements aside, whatever the proper path is, may your feet tread upon it. Peace to you.