She is very good. Well researched and put together. She puts a lot of content out very quickly which makes me wonder is she adjacent to WHs because it seems like a lot of work for one person. I’ve long thought that Markle was an agent of influence of aimed at the royal family it just remains to be seen how.
She has a lot of shady connections like Ron Burkle, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2086599/Soho-House-private-members-club-chain-bought-250m-Clintons-friend-Ron-Burkle.html the bronfmans, John Fitzpatrick and has been in the orbit of the Clinton’s for years. https://images.app.goo.gl/uSsfJQwQjND4KN6ZA
I wonder if the Sussex royal foundation that she tried to launch after walking away from the BRF was a move to try to replace the Clinton foundation which was punctured by the ongoing IRS Tax court case brought by Moynihan & Doyle? https://youtu.be/pbZSuN7vTXw
The Queen submitted to GEOTUS as evidenced by her allowing him to go first on the state visit etc . https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/14/us/trump-walks-front-queen-elizabeth.html
I don’t think she wanted Charles to take the throne - I believe she was behind the media stories (via the Times that has long standing as the media of choice for royal household leaks and stories)https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/charles-accepted-1m-cash-in-suitcase-from-sheikh-j2pgnfsgx about his financial dodgy dealings https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-63690651
in a move to try to press him to abdicate in favor of William. Following Diana’s death the Queen stepped in and pretty much took over as William’s mentor and saw him frequently. https://www.goodto.com/royal-news/queen-prince-william-prepared-to-be-king-mentoring-595828 Given that freemasonry excludes women I don’t think the Queen was the leader I think it was the Duke of Gloucester. I wonder if she was allowed to be a meat puppet figurehead and kept in line by Diana’s death? Let’s face it, being able to take out the biggest star in the family with impunity would be a hell of a way to push your view point and to get Charles in line with an agenda. No one would believe he hadn’t ordered it (although I don’t think he did as I doubt he has the cojones). I wonder if Michael Fawcett (who charges famously said he could t do without) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12429871/Is-Charles-former-aide-set-make-comeback-Michael-Fawcett-work-King-private-capacity-police-dropped-probe-cash-honours-claims.html was integral in the whole situation and Charles was then in the fold and secured in the cabal.
I wonder if she hung on as long as she could but he would t step aside and she couldn’t force it. It’s interesting that both the queen and William visited MI5 & MI6 after Markle https://www.insider.com/prince-william-spent-3-weeks-working-in-secret-at-mi5-and-mi6-2019-4 https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a31094138/queen-elizabeth-mi5-secret-visit-speech-video/
Given what Grifty has turned up I am wondering if Charles is using Markle and his idiot son to push the globalist censorship agenda from another angle and also to obliquely attack William? It’s very weird that he’s. It making any move to protect his son and heir at all. There seems to have been a shift in power following the Queens death - although Chuck got the throne I think William has the money - maybe the capitulation of the Queen handed over the finances to GEOTUS? Charles seems to spend most of his time in Scotland since his accession (exile?). William seemed to be in charge of the coronation etc as media coverage seemed to indicate he was being deferred to for arrangements? IIRC The duchy of Cornwall that funds the prince of wales is bigger https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/09/duchy-of-cornwall-estate-worth-1bn-passes-to-prince-william
than the duchy of Lancaster https://www.prestigeonline.com/th/people/king-charles-iii-net-worth/
And if the late queen handed that over to GEOTUS then Chuck may have gotten an empty title and had to tolerate his son wearing the pants financially?
She is very good. Well researched and put together. She puts a lot of content out very quickly which makes me wonder is she adjacent to WHs because it seems like a lot of work for one person. I’ve long thought that Markle was an agent of influence of aimed at the royal family it just remains to be seen how.
She has a lot of shady connections like Ron Burkle, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2086599/Soho-House-private-members-club-chain-bought-250m-Clintons-friend-Ron-Burkle.html the bronfmans, John Fitzpatrick and has been in the orbit of the Clinton’s for years. https://images.app.goo.gl/uSsfJQwQjND4KN6ZA
I wonder if the Sussex royal foundation that she tried to launch after walking away from the BRF was a move to try to replace the Clinton foundation which was punctured by the ongoing IRS Tax court case brought by Moynihan & Doyle? https://youtu.be/pbZSuN7vTXw
The Queen submitted to GEOTUS as evidenced by her allowing him to go first on the state visit etc . https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/14/us/trump-walks-front-queen-elizabeth.html
I don’t think she wanted Charles to take the throne - I believe she was behind the media stories (via the Times that has long standing as the media of choice for royal household leaks and stories)https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/charles-accepted-1m-cash-in-suitcase-from-sheikh-j2pgnfsgx about his financial dodgy dealings https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-63690651
in a move to try to press him to abdicate in favor of William. Following Diana’s death the Queen stepped in and pretty much took over as William’s mentor and saw him frequently. https://www.goodto.com/royal-news/queen-prince-william-prepared-to-be-king-mentoring-595828 Given that freemasonry excludes women I don’t think the Queen was the leader I think it was the Duke of Gloucester. I wonder if she was allowed to be a meat puppet figurehead and kept in line by Diana’s death? Let’s face it, being able to take out the biggest star in the family with impunity would be a hell of a way to push your view point and to get Charles in line with an agenda. No one would believe he hadn’t ordered it (although I don’t think he did as I doubt he has the cojones). I wonder if Michael Fawcett (who charges famously said he could t do without) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12429871/Is-Charles-former-aide-set-make-comeback-Michael-Fawcett-work-King-private-capacity-police-dropped-probe-cash-honours-claims.html was integral in the whole situation and Charles was then in the fold and secured in the cabal.
I wonder if she hung on as long as she could but he would t step aside and she couldn’t force it. It’s interesting that both the queen and William visited MI5 & MI6 after Markle https://www.insider.com/prince-william-spent-3-weeks-working-in-secret-at-mi5-and-mi6-2019-4 https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a31094138/queen-elizabeth-mi5-secret-visit-speech-video/