Some things are intentionally hidden and suppressed.
So, how do we figure out what the truth is?
I have found the best way to get at what is LIKELY the truth (we might never have 100% certainty, and we have to accept that) is to look at two sides of a debate:
Side A says THIS.
Side B says THAT.
Ok, first off, do both arguments make sense, or is one of them kinda not making sense?
But we have to go deeper than that.
So next, does Side A have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side B's THAT? Does Side B have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side A's THIS?
Finally, can either side rebut the rebuttal? Can either side provide either evidence or a logical argument (sometimes, evidence is lacking) to (a) support their opinion, (b) provide a rebuttal to the other side's opinion, and (c) provide a rebuttal to the other side's rebuttal?
When you get into both sides of the argument, you ALMOST ALWAYS find that one side or the other doesn't really have anything to back up their claims and cannot provide a coherent rebuttal.
This is WHY they resort to name-calling and censorship. It is ALL they have.
And that is how you know they lie, or at least do not really know what they are talking about.
ALSO:
The "Russian Revolution" was not a revolution of Russians. It was an overthrow by jews, funded by wealthy jews in NYC and London.
But ... WHY would they want to do this?
Clearly, they wanted to overthrow the Russian Tsar. First, they tried in 1904 by funding the Japanese in a war against Russia. That didn't work, and they then drew Russia into WW1 to distract them from internal affairs. That is when Lenin and Trotsky were sent to Moscow for the coup d'etat.
But ... WHY?
I can only speculate, but I suspect that the jews have had a many-centuries hatred of Russia because Russia defeated the Khazarian Empire more than 1,000 years ago, which was just to the south of Russia.
I suspect it was (and still is) a vendetta.
From Wiki on Leon Trotsky (leader of the "Russian Revolution"):
Leon Trotsky, was a Russian revolutionary, Soviet politician, journalist and political theorist. He was a central figure in the 1905 Revolution, October Revolution, Russian Civil War, and the establishment of the Soviet Union.
Alongside Vladimir Lenin, Trotsky was widely considered the most prominent Soviet figure and was de facto second-in-command during the early years of the Russian Soviet Republic.
Born into a wealthy Jewish family ...
Uh-huh ...
Some things are intentionally hidden and suppressed.
So, how do we figure out what the truth is?
I have found the best way to get at what is LIKELY the truth (we might never have 100% certainty, and we have to accept that) is to look at two sides of a debate:
Side A says THIS.
Side B says THAT.
Ok, first off, do both arguments make sense, or is one of them kinda not making sense?
But we have to go deeper than that.
So next, does Side A have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side B's THAT? Does Side B have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side A's THIS?
Finally, can either side rebut the rebuttal? Can either side provide either evidence or a logical argument (sometimes, evidence is lacking) to (a) support their opinion, (b) provide a rebuttal to the other side's opinion, and (c) provide a rebuttal to the other side's rebuttal?
When you get into both sides of the argument, you ALMOST ALWAYS find that one side or the other doesn't really have anything to back up their claims and cannot provide a coherent rebuttal.
This is WHY they resort to name-calling and censorship. It is ALL they have.
And that is how you know they lie, or at least do not really know what they are talking about.
ALSO:
The "Russian Revolution" was not a revolution of Russians. It was an overthrow by jews, funded by wealthy jews in NYC and London.
But ... WHY would they want to do this?
Clearly, they wanted to overthrow the Russian Tsar. First, they tried in 1904 by funding the Japanese in a war against Russia. That didn't work, and they then drew Russian into WW1 to distract them from internal affairs. That is when Lenin and Trotsky was sent to Moscow for the coup d'etat.
But ... WHY?
I can only speculate, but I suspect that the jews have had a many-centuries hatred of Russia because Russia defeated the Khazarian Empire more than 1,000 years ago, which was just to the south of Russia.
I suspect it was (and still is) a vendetta.
From Wiki on Leon Trotsky (leader of the "Russian Revolution"):
Leon Trotsky, was a Russian revolutionary, Soviet politician, journalist and political theorist. He was a central figure in the 1905 Revolution, October Revolution, Russian Civil War, and the establishment of the Soviet Union.
Alongside Vladimir Lenin, Trotsky was widely considered the most prominent Soviet figure and was de facto second-in-command during the early years of the Russian Soviet Republic.
Born into a wealthy Jewish family ...
Uh-huh ...
Some things are intentionally hidden and suppressed.
So, how do we figure out what the truth is?
I have found the best way to get at what is LIKELY the truth (we might never have 100% certainty, and we have to accept that) is to look at two sides of a debate:
Side A says THIS.
Side B says THAT.
Ok, first off, to both arguments make sense, or is one of them kinda not making sense?
Next, does Side A have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side B's THAT? Does Side B have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side A's THIS?
Finally, can either side rebut the rebuttal? Can either side provide either evidence or a logical argument (sometimes, evidence is lacking) to (a) support their opinion, (b) provide a rebuttal to the other side's opinion, and (c) provide a rebuttal to the other side's rebuttal?
When you get into both sides of the argument, you ALMOST ALWAYS find that one side or the other doesn't really have anything to back up their claims and cannot provide a coherent rebuttal.
This is WHY they resort to name-calling and censorship. It is ALL they have.
And that is how you know they lie, or at least do not really know what they are talking about.
ALSO:
The "Russian Revolution" was not a revolution of Russians. It was an overthrow by jews, funded by wealthy jews in NYC and London.
But ... WHY would they want to do this?
Clearly, they wanted to overthrow the Russian Tsar. First, they tried in 1904 by funding the Japanese in a war against Russia. That didn't work, and they then drew Russian into WW1 to distract them from internal affairs. That is when Lenin and Trotsky was sent to Moscow for the coup d'etat.
But ... WHY?
I can only speculate, but I suspect that the jews have had a many-centuries hatred of Russia because Russia defeated the Khazarian Empire more than 1,000 years ago, which was just to the south of Russia.
I suspect it was (and still is) a vendetta.
From Wiki on Leon Trotsky (leader of the "Russian Revolution"):
Leon Trotsky, was a Russian revolutionary, Soviet politician, journalist and political theorist. He was a central figure in the 1905 Revolution, October Revolution, Russian Civil War, and the establishment of the Soviet Union.
Alongside Vladimir Lenin, Trotsky was widely considered the most prominent Soviet figure and was de facto second-in-command during the early years of the Russian Soviet Republic.
Born into a wealthy Jewish family ...
Uh-huh ...
Some things are intentionally hidden and suppressed.
So, how do we figure out what the truth is?
I have found the best way to get at what is LIKELY the truth (we might never have 100% certainty, and we have to accept that) is to look at two sides of a debate:
Side A says THIS.
Side B says THAT.
Ok, first off, to both arguments make sense, or is one of them kinda not making sense?
Next, does Side A have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side B's THAT? Does Side B have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side A's THIS?
Finally, can either side rebut the rebuttal? Can either side provide either evidence or a logical argument (sometimes, evidence is lacking) to (a) support their opinion, (b) provide a rebuttal to the other side's opinion, and (c) provide a rebuttal to the other side's rebuttal?
When you get into both sides of the argument, you ALMOST ALWAYS find that one side or the other doesn't really have anything to back up their claims and cannot provide a coherent rebuttal.
This is WHY they resort to name-calling and censorship. It is ALL they have.
And that is how you know they lie, or at least do not really know what they are talking about.