Look, Trump is not merely picking people that are qualified, that he thinks will be loyal, and do a great job, there is 5D chess strategy involved in his choices.

After this Q centered group drilled down on every word that Q put out to extract every drop of juice from his drops, I am a little disappointed that the same group of very cleaver people, this sites members as a whole, is not working more diligently to map out the strategy that is being played out day to day by Trump team in near realtime, right before our eyes. A historic battle is taking place, and it's like no one is recording the events.

We have no look ahead efforts to map out the unbelievable tactics that are being employed to defeat a still powerful entrenched enemy. It's like all the brain power, and research talent when up to the point of election night victory, and everyone just said, "we won", and closed up shop.

What Trump did by announcing Deputy AG Todd Blanche and Interim Acting DAG Emil Bove is a lesson in 6th generation political warfare, in my view, and we should make a effort to create a strategic map of battle charting the tactics that are playing out.

Unless I am wrong, a Deputy AG, prior to confirmation of AG, can act with all the powers of an AG. This means that if you put a bulldog in that position who is an equal threat to what the AG would be, you put massive pressure on the Senate to confirm your AG choice.

Remember when John Ratcliffe was up for confirmation as DNI during Trumps first term, and Senate was dragging it's feet. Trump named Rick Grenell as acting Director of National Intelligence, and shortly after Ratcliffe was confirmed by Senate. Trump put someone in acting spot that scared them worse than the person they were afraid to confirm. Grenell had all the powers as acting DNI that Ratcliffe had, and it scared the shit out of them.

I think this is the same play being run here. And if it is, it deserves being recognized for the genius game play that it is. Deserves to be plugged into that map that needs to exist.

By mapping this out we will more clearly see the war being fought, what the moves on the board are. This will more enable us to anticipate what the next move might be, help us fully appreciate the clever way the battle was fought when the battle is won, and stand as lessons to use in the next challenge.

Look, Trump is not merely picking people that are qualified, that he thinks will be loyal, and do a great job, there is 5D chess strategy involved in his choices.

After this Q centered group drilled down on every word that Q put out to extract every drop of juice from his drops, I am a little disappointed that the same group of very cleaver people, this sites members as a whole, is not working more diligently to map out the strategy that is being played out day to day by Trump team in near realtime, right before our eyes. A historic battle is taking place, and it's like no one is recording the events.

We have no look ahead efforts to map out the unbelievable tactics that are being employed to defeat a still powerful entrenched enemy. It's like all the brain power, and research talent when up to the point of election night victory, and everyone just said, "we won", and closed up shop.

What Trump did by announcing Deputy AG Todd Blanche and Interim Acting DAG Emil Bove is a lesson in 6th generation political warfare, in my view, and we should make a effort to create a strategic map of battle laden with the tactics that are playing out.

Unless I am wrong, a Deputy AG, prior to confirmation of AG, can act with all the powers of an AG. This means that if you put a bulldog in that position who is an equal threat to what the AG would be, you put massive pressure on the Senate to confirm your AG choice.

Remember when John Ratcliffe was up for confirmation as DNI during Trumps first term, and Senate was dragging it's feet. Trump named Rick Grenell as acting Director of National Intelligence, and shortly after Ratcliffe was confirmed by Senate. Trump put someone in acting spot that scared them worse than the person they were afraid to confirm. Grenell had all the powers as acting DNI that Ratcliffe had, and it scared the shit out of them.

I think this is the same play being run here. And if it is, it deserves being recognized for the genius game play that it is. Deserves to be plugged into that map that needs to exist.

By mapping this out we will more clearly see the war being fought, what the moves on the board are. This will more enable us to anticipate what the next move might be, help us fully appreciate the clever way the battle was fought when the battle is won, and stand as lessons to use in the next challenge.

Look, Trump is not merely picking people that are qualified, that he things will be loyal, and do a great job, there is 5D chess strategy involved in his choices.

After this Q centered group drilled down on every word that Q put out to extract every drop of juice from his drops, I am a little disappointed that the same group of very cleaver people, this sites members as a whole, is not working more diligently to map out the strategy that is being played out day to day by Trump team in near realtime, right before our eyes. A historic battle is taking place, and it's like no one is recording the events.

We have no look ahead efforts to map out the unbelievable tactics that are being employed to defeat a still powerful entrenched enemy. It's like all the brain power, and research talent when up to the point of election night victory, and everyone just said, "we won", and closed up shop.

What Trump did by announcing Deputy AG Todd Blanche and Interim Acting DAG Emil Bove is a lesson in 6th generation political warfare, in my view, and we should make a effort to create a strategic map of battle laden with the tactics that are playing out.

Unless I am wrong, a Deputy AG, prior to confirmation of AG, can act with all the powers of an AG. This means that if you put a bulldog in that position who is an equal threat to what the AG would be, you put massive pressure on the Senate to confirm your AG choice.

Remember when John Ratcliffe was up for confirmation as DNI during Trumps first term, and Senate was dragging it's feet. Trump named Rick Grenell as acting Director of National Intelligence, and shortly after Ratcliffe was confirmed by Senate. Trump put someone in acting spot that scared them worse than the person they were afraid to confirm. Grenell had all the powers as acting DNI that Ratcliffe had, and it scared the shit out of them.

I think this is the same play being run here. And if it is, it deserves being recognized for the genius game play that it is. Deserves to be plugged into that map that needs to exist.

By mapping this out we will more clearly see the war being fought, what the moves on the board are. This will more enable us to anticipate what the next move might be, help us fully appreciate the clever way the battle was fought when the battle is won, and stand as lessons to use in the next challenge.

Look, Trump is not merely picking people that a qualified, that he things will be loyal, and do a great job, there is 5D chess strategy involved in his choices.

After this Q centered group drilled down on every word that Q put out to extract every drop of juice from his drops, I am a little disappointed that the same group of very cleaver people, this sites members as a whole, is not working more diligently to map out the strategy that is being played out day to day by Trump team.

We have to look ahead efforts to map out the unbelievable tactics that are being employed to defeat a still powerful entrenched enemy. It's like all the brain power, and research talent when up to the point of election night victory, and every just said, "we won", and closed up shop.

What Trump did by announcing Deputy AG Todd Blanche and Interim Acting DAG Emil Bove is a lesson in 6th generation political warfare, in my view, and we should make a effort to create a strategic map of battle laden with the tactics that are playing out.

Unless I am wrong, a Deputy AG, prior to confirmation of AG, can act with all the powers of an AG. This means that if you put a bulldog in that position who is an equal threat to what the AG would be, you put massive pressure on the Senate to confirm your AG choice.

Remember when John Ratcliffe was up for confirmation as DNI during Trumps first term, and Senate was dragging it's feet. Trump named Rick Grenell as acting Director of National Intelligence, and shortly after Ratcliffe was confirmed by Senate. Trump put someone in acting spot that scared them worse than the person they were afraid to confirm. Grenell had all the powers as acting DNI that Ratcliffe had, and it scared the shit out of them.

I think this is the same play being run here. And if it is, it deserves being recognized for the genius game play that it is. Deserves to be plugged into that map that needs to exist.

By mapping this out we will more clearly see the war being fault, what the moves on the board are. This will more enable us to anticipate what the next move might be, help us fully appreciate the clever way the battle was fought when the battle is won, and stand as lessons to use in the next challenge.