Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Yeah, something like that. Not sure it's quite everything. Parasites are real. Microbes can kill indirectly, but only because their healing assistance (remove dead tissue, stimulate inflammation) gets ramped up to the point of becoming counterproductive when the trauma is severe (which is why antibiotics are necessary for surgery and severe injury). But that's true also of the body's own healing mechanisms such as fever and inflammation. Malnutrition invites disease not by lowering immune resistance to microbes but by causing malfunction of processes, preventing proper growth and repair, or causing degenerate tissue and cells that invite the microbe crews to clean them up. Gut bacterial colonies can get out of balance, with some strains that work more harmoniously with us than others. But the imbalance is always caused by a terrain imbalance within us, usually brought on by mental stress or a diet that does not pay heed to our evolutionary requirements. Microbes are the proverbial firemen that get blamed for the fire. Firemen often do a lot of damage to a structure in order to save it. Rarely would one ever say this damage is worse than the outcome had they done nothing. And viruses don't exist. Germs are the scapegoat, the contrived cause to cover for all the inhumane actions men do to others that actually cause disease (pollution, war, theft of land and resources), or else the excuse provided to those who do not take care of themselves and want to blame something outside of themselves for the consequences. So what remains of Germ Theory? It has always been a lie used to control people and extort wealth.

I didn't start out questioning germ theory, either. I started years ago with the HIV fraud and reading Duesberg's "Inventing the AIDS Virus". Then I read Virus Mania very soon into the Cooties 19 roll out. Eventually, I started listening to Kaufman who provided the generalization to germ theory as a whole, and an introduction to the alternative. Like any paradigm shift, once I saw the implausibility and lack of evidence for the old theory, and began operating under a new working theory, the world looks very different. And, there's no reason to fear all this talk about gain of function and weaponization of microbes. The fact that they still need a needle in your arm is proof that they still haven't figured out how to transmit disease by means of contagion.

Anyway, you are no doubt able to comprehend and appreciate a fuller exposition of the theory, so I thought it worthwhile to take the time. One person at a time . . .

2 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Yeah, something like that. Not sure it's quite everything. Parasites are real. Microbes can kill indirectly, but only because their healing assistance (remove dead tissue, stimulate inflammation) gets ramped up to the point of becoming counterproductive when the trauma is severe (which is why antibiotics are necessary for surgery and severe injury). But that's true also of the body's own healing mechanisms such as fever and inflammation. Malnutrition invites disease not by lowering immune resistance to microbes but by causing malfunction of processes, preventing proper growth and repair, or causing degenerate tissue and cells that invite the microbe crews to clean them up. Gut bacterial colonies can get out of balance, with some strains that work more harmoniously with us than others. But the imbalance is always caused by a terrain imbalance within us, usually brought on by mental stress or a diet that does not pay heed to our evolutionary requirements. Microbes are the proverbial firemen that get blamed for the fire. Firemen often do a lot of damage to a structure in order to save it. Rarely would one ever say this damage is worse than the outcome had they done nothing. And viruses don't exist. Germs are the scapegoat, the contrived cause to cover for all the inhumane actions men do to others that actually cause disease (pollution, war, theft of land and resources), or else the excuse provided to those who do not take care of themselves and want to blame something outside of themselves for the consequences. So what remains of Germ Theory? It has always been a lie used to control people and extort wealth.

I didn't start out questioning germ theory, either. I started years ago with the HIV fraud and reading Duesberg's "Inventing the AIDS Virus". Then I read Virus Mania very soon into the Cooties 19 roll out. Eventually, I started listening to Kaufman who provided the generalization, the coup de grace, and an introduction to the alternative. Like any paradigm shift, once I saw the implausibility and lack of evidence for the old theory, and began operating under a new working theory, the world looks very different. And, there's no reason to fear all this talk about gain of function and weaponization of microbes. The fact that they still need a needle in your arm is proof that they still haven't figured out how to transmit disease using contagion.

Anyway, you are no doubt able to comprehend and appreciate a fuller exposition of the theory, so I thought it worthwhile to take the time. One person at a time . . .

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Yeah, something like that. Not sure it's quite everything. Parasites are real. Microbes can kill indirectly, but only because their healing assistance (remove dead tissue, stimulate inflammation) gets ramped up to the point of becoming counterproductive when the trauma is severe (which is why antibiotics are necessary for surgery and severe injury). But that's true also of the body's own healing mechanisms such as fever and inflammation. Malnutrition invites disease not by lowering immune resistance to microbes but by causing malfunction of processes, preventing proper growth and repair, or causing degenerate tissue and cells that invite the microbe crews to clean them up. Gut bacterial colonies can get out of balance, with some strains that work more harmoniously with us than others. But the imbalance is always caused by a terrain imbalance within us, usually brought on by mental stress or a diet that does not pay heed to our evolutionary requirements. Microbes are the proverbial firemen that get blamed for the fire. Firemen often do a lot of damage to a structure in order to save it. Rarely would one ever say this damage is worse than the outcome had they done nothing. And viruses don't exist. Germs are the scapegoat, the contrived cause to cover for all the inhumane actions men do to others that actually cause disease (pollution, war, theft of land and resources), or else the excuse provided to those who do not take care of themselves and want to blame something outside of themselves for the consequences. So what remains of Germ Theory? It has always been a lie used to control people and extort wealth.

I didn't start out questioning germ theory, either. I started years ago with the HIV fraud and reading Duesberg's "Inventing the AIDS Virus". Then I read Virus Mania very soon into the Cooties 19 roll out. Eventually, I started listening to Kaufman who provided the generalization, the coup de grace. Like any paradigm shift, once you see the implausibility and lack of evidence for the old theory, and begin operating under a new working theory, the world looks very different. And, there's no reason to fear all this talk about gain of function and weaponization of microbes. The fact that they still need a needle in your arm is proof that they still haven't figured out how to transmit disease using contagion.

Anyway, you are no doubt able to comprehend and appreciate a fuller exposition of the theory, so I thought it worthwhile to take the time. One person at a time . . .

2 years ago
1 score