We'e not talking about covid. My lab requested inactivated covid from the CDC and ate silence. But viruses exist, HIV exists. "Exosomes" exist, but they are NOT a source of infectivity, nor is that infectivity endogenously created - the genetic code, which itself codes for the virus (or your 'exosomes'), is NOT present in your genome. It's source is EXTERNAL, -I've- programmed de novo material with exclusive viral genome and created viral particles.
The source is the genomic material. That material is NOT part of you. That genomic material creates viral particles. Those three points are all it takes and it does not require a leap of faith to believe me or the host of literature on the subject.
Send me your best peer reviewed papers you think argues what you think it does. I think you profoundly misunderstand the role of these cell lines. (I hate vero cells, but I'll fucking defend them in this context). I can't believe how awake you all are to how bullshit 'peer reviewed' papers are when it comes to nonsense surrounding covid, but then you'll turn around and turn off your brain because you found a peer revied paper that said something you liked.
We'e not talking about covid. My lab requested inactivated covid from the CDC and ate silence. But viruses exist, HIV exists. "Exosomes" exist, but they are NOT a source of infectivity, nor is that infectivity endogenously created - the genetic code, which itself codes for the virus (or your 'exosomes'), is NOT present in your genome. It's source is EXTERNAL, -I've- programmed de novo material with exclusive viral genome and created viral particles.
The source is the genomic material. That material is NOT part of you. That genomic material creates viral particles. Those three points are all it takes and it does not require a leap of faith to believe me or the host of literature on the subject.
Send me your best peer reviewed papers you think argue what you think you do. I think you profoundly misunderstand the role of these cell lines. (I hate vero cells, but I'll fucking defend them in this context). I can't believe how awake you are to how bullshit 'peer reviewed' papers are when it comes to nonsense surrounding covid, but then you'll turn around and turn off your brain because you found a peer revied paper that said something you liked.
We'e not talking about covid. My lab requested inactivated covid from the CDC and ate silence. But viruses exist, HIV exists. "Exosomes" exist, but they are NOT a source of infectivity, nor is that infectivity endogenously created - the genetic code, which itself codes for the virus (or your 'exosomes'), is NOT present in your genome. It's source is EXTERNAL, we've programmed de novo material with exclusive viral genome and created viral particles.
The source is the genomic material. That material is NOT part of you. That genomic material creates viral particles. Those three points are all it takes and it does not require a leap of faith to believe me or the host of literature on the subject.
Send me your best peer reviewed papers you think argue what you think you do. I think you profoundly misunderstand the role of these cell lines. (I hate vero cells, but I'll fucking defend them in this context). I can't believe how awake you are to how bullshit 'peer reviewed' papers are when it comes to nonsense surrounding covid, but then you'll turn around and turn off your brain because you found a peer revied paper that said something you liked.