Generally, it's the right idea. I think there should be additional questions asking --

• Please state the purpose for which you believe the policy will be necessary to the operation of the company
• Please state if you believe any of these medical treatments will be helpful to others in the company
• Please provide the scientific research that supports your conclusion that these experimental drugs are in any way beneficial regarding the reduction in the spread of any virus or illness
• Please provide the scientific research that supports your conclusion that these experimental drugs are in any way beneficial regarding the reduction of symptoms of illness

The supposed reason to mandate these experimental drugs is to help others in the company by reducing the spread of Covid, and/or to reduce symptoms so that people have less time off from work. If these claims were true, these mandates would benefit the company. But these claims are not true. There is no scientific basis to believe they are true. Therefore, there is no way they can justify these mandates when they are not based on anything real. It's just fear porn. That means there is no way they can win (assuming we have honest, competent courts).