Is the implication that Sussman has turned state’s witness? The way it’s phrased, “question Sussman and a new witness,” makes it sound like Sussman is one witness and now there is a new witness too. Plus it seems strange a defendant would be questioned by a prosecutor before a trial.

Is the implication that Sussman has turned state’s witness? The way it’s phrased, “question Susanna and a new witness,” makes it sound like Sussman is one witness and now there is a new witness too. Plus it seems strange a defendant would be questioned by a prosecutor before a trial.