Lindell's symposium was to award "to disprove" the data, not "to prove".

According to Mike Lindell, what was to be disproven is that the data came from the 2020 election. I find that to mean confirmation but either term works for me.

Packet logs

Why did you insert that? Once again, according to Mike, his original request to the red team was to disprove the data he had was from the 2020 election. He showed them data (not the packet captures) and the red team agreed the data they saw was from the 2020 election thus no 5 million reward.

The only reasonable easy proof I would be able to slam my fist down on a table would be if foreign actors backdoored the machines and used some commonly available remote desktop ...

I couldn’t agree more, however that was not the challenge. Mike’s challenge was for the red team to disprove the data he showed the red team was from the 2020 election which they didn’t do.

Lindell's symposium was to award "to disprove" the data, not "to prove".

According to Mike Lindell, what was to be disproven is that the data came from the 2020 election. I find that to mean confirmation but either term works for me.

Packet logs

Why did you insert that? Once again, according to Mike, his original request to the red team was to disprove the data he had was from the 2020 election. He showed them data (not the packet captures) and the red team agreed the data they saw was from the 2020 election thus no 5 million reward.

The only reasonable easy proof I would be able to slam my fist down on a table would be if foreign actors backdoored the machines and used some commonly available remote desktop ...

I couldn’t agree more, however that was not the challenge. Mike’s challenge was for the red team to disprove the data he showed the red team was from the 2020 election.

Lindell's symposium was to award "to disprove" the data, not "to prove".

According to Mike Lindell, what was to be disproven is that the data came from the 2020 election. I find that to mean confirmation but either term works for me.

Packet logs

Why did you insert that? Once again, according to Mike, his original request to the red team was to disprove the data he had was from the 2020 election. He showed them data (not the packet captures) and the red team agreed the data they saw was from the 2020 election this no 5 million reward.

The only reasonable easy proof I would be able to slam my fist down on a table would be if foreign actors backdoored the machines and used some commonly available remote desktop

I couldn’t agree more, however that was not the challenge. Mike’s challenge was for the red team to disprove the data he showed the red team was from the 2020 election.