Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Imagine a golf exhibition match between two players, conducted without any video cameras and all of the scorecards were destroyed right after being turned in. The next day, the newspapers all reported that Elihu Smails won, even though Al Czervik beat him by 2 strokes. But ESPN and all of the media insist that Czervik was an idiot and miscalculated his scores. They insist that all of spectators also miscounted. The Bushwood officials however, claimed they did better math and were correct that Smails in fact won. Who would question the experts? Who'd believe that goofball loudmouth Czervik? Who'd believe the minority of spectators who were really paying attention and counted the strokes? They're just a bunch of degenerate caddies, a drunk playboy and a baked greenskeeper... so sayeth the Bushwood officials...

Q RODNEY

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Imagine a golf exhibition match between two players, conducted without any video cameras and all of the scorecards were destroyed right after being turned in. The next day, the newspapers all reported that Elihu Smails won, even though Al Czervik beat him by 2 strokes. But ESPN and all of the media insist that Czervik was drunk and miscalculated his scores. They insist that all of spectators also miscounted. The Bushwood officials however, claimed they did better math and were correct that Smails in fact won. Who would question the experts? Who'd believe that goofball loudmouth Czervik? Who'd believe the minority of spectators who were really paying attention and counted the strokes? They're just a bunch of degenerate caddies, a drunk playboy and a baked greenskeeper... so sayeth the Bushwood officials...

Q RODNEY

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Imagine a golf exhibition match between two players, conducted without any video cameras and all of the scorecards were destroyed right after being turned in. The next day, the newspapers all reported that Elihu Smails won, even though Al Czervik beat him by 2 strokes. But ESPN and all of the media insist that Czervik was drunk and miscalculated his scores. They insist that all of spectators also miscounted. The Bushwood officials however, claimed they did better math and were correct that Smails in fact won. Who would question the experts? Who'd believe that goofball loudmouth Czervik? Who'd believe the minority of spectators who were really paying attention and counted the strokes? They're just a bunch of degenerate caddies, a drunk playboy and a baked greenskeeper... so sayeth the Bushwood officials...

1 year ago
1 score