There's a pattern to shilling.
Step 1: Identify some obscure conspiracy item of contention far outside the scope of Q.
Step 2: Weave that topic into all comments with boilerplate copypasta drivel, even on completely unrelated threads.
Step 3: Pretend that conspiracy is common knowledge, berating and using ad hominem in response to anyone who objects, defending the position 20 comments deep if necessary.
Step 4: Conflate that conspiracy with Q, so that newcomers to Q believe that everyone also believes the obscure conspiracy.
For instance, take a look at HuntersCrackDealinHo's comment below. Boilerplate copypasta 95% of their post. Then a handshake bot John_Mac_n_Cheese agrees, with 100% boilerplate. Then HuntersCrack responds with 100% more boilerplate.
You've seen it with flat earth shills, the insistence that all bad guys are "Khazarians" shills, or the bad guys are only _____ (insert Freemasons, Jews, Jesuits, etc.), pro-Naziism shills, anti-Russian shills, hostile pro-Catholics, even hostile pro-Christians.
If you look, their grammar, word usage is practically the same. They'll go 30 posts deep defending their ideology. They never actually respond to any rebuttals directly. They inject copious amounts of unrelated boilerplate drivel supporting their points while completely ignoring any counter-arguments.
I actually believe most of these are DARPA AI bots. I work alot with AI and it's beyond impressive how it can formulate sentences that seem like they're from a native English speaker. DARPA's budget for 2022/2023 is over 7 billion dollars ... certainly they have capabilities light years beyond anything available to the public.
There's a pattern to shilling.
Step 1: Identify some obscure conspiracy item of contention far outside the scope of Q.
Step 2: Weave that topic into all comments, even on completely unrelated threads.
Step 3: Pretend that conspiracy is common knowledge, berating and using ad hominem in response to anyone who objects, defending the position 20 comments deep if necessary.
Step 4: Conflate that conspiracy with Q, so that newcomers to Q believe that everyone also believes the obscure conspiracy.
For instance, take a look at HuntersCrackDealinHo's comment below. Boilerplate copypasta 95% of their post. Then a handshake bot John_Mac_n_Cheese agrees, with 100% boilerplate. Then HuntersCrack responds with 100% more boilerplate.
You've seen it with flat earth shills, the insistence that all bad guys are "Khazarians" shills, or the bad guys are only _____ (insert Freemasons, Jews, Jesuits, etc.), pro-Naziism shills, anti-Russian shills, hostile pro-Catholics, even hostile pro-Christians.
If you look, their grammar, word usage is practically the same. They'll go 30 posts deep defending their ideology. They never actually respond to any rebuttals directly. They inject copious amounts of unrelated boilerplate drivel supporting their points while completely ignoring any counter-arguments.
I actually believe most of these are DARPA AI bots. I work alot with AI and it's beyond impressive how it can formulate sentences that seem like they're from a native English speaker. DARPA's budget for 2022/2023 is over 7 billion dollars ... certainly they have capabilities light years beyond anything available to the public.
There's a pattern to shilling.
Step 1: Identify some obscure conspiracy item of contention far outside the scope of Q.
Step 2: Weave that topic into all comments, even on completely unrelated threads.
Step 3: Pretend that conspiracy is common knowledge, berating and using ad hominem in response to anyone who objects, defending the position 20 comments deep if necessary.
Step 4: Conflate that conspiracy with Q, so that newcomers to Q believe that everyone also believes the obscure conspiracy.
You've seen it with flat earth shills, the insistence that all bad guys are "Khazarians" shills, or the bad guys are only _____ (insert Freemasons, Jews, Jesuits, etc.), pro-Naziism shills, anti-Russian shills, hostile pro-Catholics, even hostile pro-Christians.
If you look, their grammar, word usage is practically the same. They'll go 30 posts deep defending their ideology. They never actually respond to any rebuttals directly. They inject copious amounts of unrelated boilerplate drivel supporting their points while completely ignoring any counter-arguments.
I actually believe most of these are DARPA AI bots. I work alot with AI and it's beyond impressive how it can formulate sentences that seem like they're from a native English speaker. DARPA's budget for 2022/2023 is over 7 billion dollars ... certainly they have capabilities light years beyond anything available to the public.