Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Good discussion.

In all fairness to the positions on the table, they are mutually exclusive. They both can’t be true. Definitions are important here.

If we define Darwinian Evolution as a mindless, unguided, entirely natural process, then it stands in direct opposition to any creation story that posits a Mind, and both theories cannot both be true. One must be false.

Theistic Creation = Mind Involved

Darwinian Evolution = Mind not involved.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Well, in all fairness to the positions on the table, they are mutually exclusive. They both can’t be true. Definitions are important here.

If we define Darwinian Evolution as a mindless, unguided, entirely natural process, then it stands in direct opposition to any creation story that posits a Mind, and both theories cannot both be true. One must be false.

Theistic Creation = Mind Involved

Darwinian Evolution = Mind not involved.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Well, in all fairness to the positions on the table, they are mutually exclusive. They both can’t be true. Definitions are important here.

If we define Darwinian Evolution as a mindless, unguided, entirely natural process, then it stands in direct opposition to any creation story that posits a Mind, and both theories cannot both be true. One must be false.

Theistic Creation = Mind Involved Darwinian Evolution = Mind not involved.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Well, in all fairness to the positions on the table, they are mutually exclusive. They both can’t be true. Definitions are important here.

If we define Darwinian Evolution as a mindless, unguided, entirely natural process, then it stands in direct opposition to any creation story that posits a Mind, and both theories cannot both be true. One must be false.

1 year ago
1 score