I am an avid sport gambler. Not an addict, but a fun hobby. I apply my stats background to predictive analytics. I can tell you that unequivocally … 100% this in my opinion is a FACT. I DO NOT at this point have definitive proof, but the walks & quacks paradigm definitely applies. If u go back and watch games where coaches made inexplicable decisions in clutch situations, tag those games as ‘suspect’, there appears to be an inexplicably high correlation to the vegas straight and teaser spreads. A ‘teaser’ is where the book gives bettors anywhere from 6 to 10 additional points on the established line. Vegas sometimes overshoots the line on the spread to lure the ‘public’. When they do they get into dangerous territory with the Teasers. If they dont crank up a ‘fix’ they get crushed. I was writing a paper about it and my ‘colleagues’ advised me in no u certain terms that if i published i would wind up like Epstein. I am exponential more afraid of the sports books than ai am the deep state.

I am an avid sport gambler. Not an addict, but a fun hobby. I apply my stats background to predictive analytics. I can tell you that unequivocally … 100% this in my opinion is a FACT. I DO NOT at this point have definitive proof, but the walks & quacks paradigm definitely applies. If u go back and watch games where coaches made inexplicable decisions in clutch situations, tag those games as ‘suspect’, there appears to be an inexplicably high correlation to the vegas straight and teaser spreads. A ‘teaser’ is where the book gives bettors anywhere from 6 to 10 additional points on the established line. Vegas sometimes overshoots the line on the spread to lure the ‘public’. When they do they get into dangerous territory with the Teasers. If they dont crank up a ‘fix’ they get crushed. I was writing a paper about it and my ‘colleagues’ advised me in no u certain terms that if i published i would wind up like Epstein.

I am an avid sport gambler. Not an addict, but a fun hobby. I apply my stats background to predictive analytics. I can tell you that unequivocally … 100% this in my opinion is a FACT. I DO NOT at this point have definitive proof, but the walks & quacks paradigm definitely applies. If u go back and watch games where coaches made inexplicable decisions in clutch situations, tag those games as ‘suspect’, there appears to be an i explicably high correlation to the vegas straight and teaser spreads. A ‘teaser’ is where the book gives bettors anywhere from 6 to 10 additional points on the established line. I was writing a paper and my ‘colleagues’ advised me in no u certain terms that if i published i would wind up like Epstein.