Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Watch this:

All Signatories to this Treaty are Sovereign.

Where by Signatories I mean We The People, and by Treaty I mean Constitution (because that is what both were purported to be).

Any treaty you are forced to sign (ours) is fraudulent. Any treaty you can't reasonably exit (ours) is fraudulent.

Regardless, the DoI made implicit statements of individual sovereignty. The Constitution did not. The Bill of Rights made explicit statements of not sovereign (5th amendment's eminent domain e.g.).

With the one sentence I added above, the Bill of Rights becomes redundant. In fact the Bill of Rights becomes fraudulent.

I know perfectly well the propaganda of what the Bill of Rights pretends to be. It was not that. In actuality (i.e. what actually happened) was that it was a fraudulent document that took away Sovereign Rights from We The People and gave back those which the PTB allowed. It created the illusion of respect for and acknowledgement of Rights, but really allowed for future fuckery.

As for the origin of our Rights, yes, they are dictated to us by That Which Is. It is That Which Is that bounds us, society can't except through fraud.

Thus, any formal declaration of governance that does not contain fraud would by necessity contain explicit and unequivocal statements of our intrinsic and inalienable Rights, not by listing them out, but by stating the obvious Truth; We The People are all individually Sovereign.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Watch this:

All Signatories to this Treaty are Sovereign.

Where by Signatories I mean We The People, and by Treaty I mean Constitution (because that is what both were purported to be).

Any treaty you are forced to sign (ours) is fraudulent. Any treaty you can't reasonably exit (ours) is fraudulent.

Regardless, the DoI made implicit statements of individual sovereignty. The Constitution did not. The Bill of Rights made explicit statements of not sovereign (5th amendment eminent domain e.g.).

With the one sentence I added above, the Bill of Rights becomes redundant. In fact the Bill of Rights becomes fraudulent.

I know perfectly well the propaganda of what the Bill of Rights pretends to be. It was not that. In actuality (i.e. what actually happened) was that it was a fraudulent document that took away Sovereign Rights from We The People and gave back those which the PTB allowed. It created the illusion of respect for and acknowledgement of Rights, but really allowed for future fuckery.

As for the origin of our Rights, yes, they are dictated to us by That Which Is. It is That Which Is that bounds us, society can't except through fraud.

Thus, any formal declaration of governance that does not contain fraud would by necessity contain explicit and unequivocal statements of our intrinsic and inalienable Rights, not by listing them out, but by stating the obvious Truth; We The People are all individually Sovereign.

1 year ago
1 score