Stocks are just a bad idea, imo. It Ieaves countries open to foreign takeover. I admit. I have no idea how to tackle this problem, but the idea of some organization being able to essentially buy out your country's infrastructure just doesn't sit well with me. At what point does it become foreign interference?

And no, Leftists. This isn't a dig on capitalism. Sure, investments existed back then but capitalism predates the stock exchange.

Edit: I just thought of something, actually. It's rather simple. Any foreign investor that has a holding that has been advocating for changes that would otherwise be proven unconstitutional is fined outright. How, precisely? Foreign investors should have something of a deposit towards the country in question, commensurate to the amount they are investing there. The company is awarded a share for presenting foreign coercion and the other party fined.

If you're in another country, you are obligated to follow their laws. So if you have your money elsewhere, what difference is there?

Stocks are just a bad idea, imo. It Ieaves countries open to foreign takeover. I admit. I have no idea how to tackle this problem, but the idea of some organization being able to essentially buy out your country's infrastructure just doesn't sit well with me. At what point does it become foreign interference?

And no, Leftists. This isn't a dig on capitalism. Sure, investments existed back then but capitalism predates the stock exchange.